ACT The ACT re-introduces Blasphemy Laws

[Todman]

http://spectator.com.au/2016/08/consider-this-16/

The ACT government abolished the crime of blasphemy in 1996. Earlier this month, they brought it back. Religious vilification is now a crime in the ACT. Green MP Shane Rattenbury, former International Political Director of Greenpeace International, religious vilification is simply not acceptable in the ACT. So he introduced an amendment to the RDA in the ACT House of Assembly on 4 August. Labor and Liberals agreed and blasphemy is yet again a law in the ACT.

I'm surprised a thread hadn't been started.

 

[Todman]

If I lived in the A.C.T. I would be guilty.

 

[CM86]

http://spectator.com.au/2016/08/consider-this-16/



I'm surprised a thread hadn't been started.

They haven't reintroduced blasphemy laws.

 

[Maggie5]

View attachment 279995

If I lived in the A.C.T. I would be guilty.

Except for the writing over the top, both are where they belong. Who will flush?

Oh and from the link you posted:

A Muslim, who has his wife trail behind him - What does that say about Prince Phillip two steps behind Queenie?

 

[Gough]

Blasphemy, and vilification are totally different things. The Speccy should stick to book reviews, and grumpy old man opinion pieces.

 

[kwikfix]

 

[Lebbo73]

Except for the writing over the top, both are where they belong. Who will flush?

Oh and from the link you posted:

A Muslim, who has his wife trail behind him - What does that say about Prince Phillip two steps behind Queenie?

It says that Phillip is a Prince while Elizabeth is a Queen!

 

[Chief]

When did we become the dumping ground for the world's ****ed up racist and bigoted idiots?

Anyone?

Anyone?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com