So you are saying Carlton were smart to only give up a 6th round pick for Lobbe?Well of course it is, Contracted player traded for pick 95, had we not taken on his salary would've cost Carlton much more.
What should he have been worth?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you are saying Carlton were smart to only give up a 6th round pick for Lobbe?Well of course it is, Contracted player traded for pick 95, had we not taken on his salary would've cost Carlton much more.
That's the issue - we have really struggled to attract any to the Northern Blues. It's a bit of a catch 22. If you are a rebuilding team with lots of youth, no-one wants to play for your affiliate because a) the team gets smashed every week, and b) you get to sit on the bench behind some 18 yo scrawny kid who is learning his role for the AFL team that you desperately want to impress... no-one wants that gig
However, I'll concede that a slower turnover retaining more 'spuds' on the list might have been better. If we are keeping spuds to fill out the VFL, they might as well be our own - particularly if you are talking about guys like Dylan Buckley (who was a former F/S). I guess its a question of whether you keep going with a guy you know is struggling at your club, or whether you take a chance on someone elsewhere.
In terms of finding the next Podsiadly, Rowe, etc - there's some similar factors at play there, as well as a bit of luck. We were keen on Tim Kelly last year at pick 30, but he went at 24. Had we used our previous pick on him (pick 10) we would have been crushed, and I don't think he would have played nearly as well at Carlton as elsewhere. Those older guys tend to make an impact and be more successful at good teams too - I don't think Bayley Fristch, for example, would look any better than Jack Silvagni at Carlton. That's something far easier to do at a good team than a poor one
You'd have to ask a Port fan. However the only indication of his worth i can give you is that Port signed him for 5 years and obviously valued him high enough to be in their long term plans before the acquisition of Ryder.So you are saying Carlton were smart to only give up a 6th round pick for Lobbe?
What should he have been worth?
LoL...yeah Port valued him highly in 2014.You'd have to ask a Port fan. However the only indication of his worth i can give you is that Port signed him for 5 years and obviously valued him high enough to be in their long term plans before the acquisition of Ryder.
"His former teammate Kane Cornes told NAB AFL Trade Radio he couldn't speak highly enough of the character of Lobbe, whom he said would prove invaluable to the developing Carlton side with his professionalism and selflessness." - AFL website
Anyway, Lobbe is very low on the list of problems at Carlton.
Then you got other types of dumps like Lobbe, which is more of the typical type of dump you'd see in American sports where teams like Port want to bring in Rockliff & Watts but cant find space in the salary cap so Carlton relieve them of this by taking on a contract from a player that Port don't need.
A cheap player-coach.What are you getting out of the Lobbe dump?
"invaluable to the developing Carlton side with his professionalism and selflessness" = poor list management? for a player that cost nothing?LoL...yeah Port valued him highly in 2014.
Back in 2014 Melbourne were playing Mark Jamar ahead of Max Gawn.
Lobbe just highlights poor list management, which is Carlton’s problem.
A cheap player-coach.
I dunno man, Lobbe has been irrelevant this year until the last few pages apparently. I've taken the time to look him up and he just seems like a fantastic character to be around the club.He's in line for his first game of the year. In round 16. On 400+ a year.
If you valued him that much as a coach, just tell him to retire and sign him up to a multi year deal.
I could understand the GWS salary dumps because it served a purpose, but getting Lobbe just made absolutely no sense. The money wasted on him should have been allocated to renegotiating youngsters contracts with handshakes to make sure they stay on.
TPP floor and a backup for two very injury prone rucks in Kreuzer and PhillipsWhat are you getting out of the Lobbe dump?
I think Carlton is another example of clubs trying to push out all their experience all at once. The idea is to be able to give the young players as many games as possible but it never works as it means there are no experienced older players to protect the younger ones. It is a flawed philosophy that needs to die.
He's in line for his first game of the year. In round 16. On 400+ a year.
If you valued him that much as a coach, just tell him to retire and sign him up to a multi year deal.
I could understand the GWS salary dumps because it served a purpose, but getting Lobbe just made absolutely no sense. The money wasted on him should have been allocated to renegotiating youngsters contracts with handshakes to make sure they stay on.
I find it quite humorous how you are flip flopping whilst trying to justify the trade."invaluable to the developing Carlton side with his professionalism and selflessness" = poor list management? for a player that cost nothing?
Sorry man, I already knew you weren't willing to view anything objectively due to the preconceived anti-carlton bias but I can't continue anymore, if you're not going to be open-minded like I am then there's just no point.
Cut out the anti-Richmond stuff thanks. Find another way to deal with 2017 rather than calling us d-hs on here.
I didn't think the post you are attacking is so far from the mark, Blues' recent efforts against fellow strugglers suggests they are a poor side on a historical level.
SOS coming out so hard smelt a bit of denial which makes me worry for the Blues over the next few years.
Who rucks this weekend?I find it quite humorous how you are flip flopping whilst trying to justify the trade.
First he is a Salary dump
Then perhaps Port are still paying his salary
Then info about his performance in 2014 becomes a factor.
Some comment from Kane Cornes then is relevant.
Next he is a ‘cheap’ coach.
For mine it just highlights poor list management, which remains a big problem at Carlton.
Marchbank didn't play for 11 weeks at any level and then was dropped into the team who went up and played in 26 degrees and high humidity. Silly move by the selection panel and medicos.Has anyone questioned why two Carlton players have had heart issues two weeks running? How often do heart conditions arise in a normal season? Two players from the same club in successive weeks must be quite the anomaly.
No statement from the club except a comment from Thomas. Apparently it's nothing big, Marchbank was short of breath so received medication to lower his heart rate, he was advised to not play out the rest of the game.Has anyone questioned why two Carlton players have had heart issues two weeks running? How often do heart conditions arise in a normal season? Two players from the same club in successive weeks must be quite the anomaly.
Port will probably go with Dixon and Westhoff like they did earlier in the year when ryder went down.Who rucks this weekend?
Hmm, lucky we have the ruck depth to cover for Kreuz and Philips. Would've been terrible list management to be forced to play an underdeveloped 19 year-old against Westhoff.Matthew Lobbe.