so what do you come up with?I think I’ve formed a few opinions based on what he says in the interviews, regardless of whether he’s being honest or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so what do you come up with?I think I’ve formed a few opinions based on what he says in the interviews, regardless of whether he’s being honest or not.
I'd be interested in that too Johny!!so what do you come up with?
There is a Facebook page run by Stuart Mullins from the Satin Man book fame.Friends, if you feel there's benefit in investigators having full access to this material, your sharing and comments on this post could play a part in bringing that material out from behind closed doors.
You're right, John Wayne Gacy comes to mind as does Gary Ridgway, the green river killer, their families were completely in the dark!!If we look back at every serial killer. Nearly all hid what they were doing from their immediate family.
That's what pricked my eyes open, how could he get that sentence so wrong. Someone who claims he'swas convicted of violently raping Max's son a little over a month before the Beaumont kids disappeared.
He wasnt - he was convicted 50 years after they went missing
I feel the biggest mistake in the whole BC case, is trying to pin it to one man- hence the conflicting descriptions on the day of the disappearance, and the boldness of some people in their role (ie speaking to witnesses).
After reading the material here, I'm of the opinion that many people played a role, and that the names mentioned here were involved in varying degrees- I wouldn't exclude anyone. I would also allow for some other names not mentioned, to be added.
It (the abduction) appears to be similar to a heist- planned and executed. Munro, M McIntyre, Phipps have been connected with each other, allow for a few on the peripheral, and it's easy to see how different people would play different roles.
Another issue I have is the assessment of those involved- this is a subculture, people meet and get to know each other, some build strong relationships, others take a dislike to another's personality and have little to do with them. Doesn't mean they won't help each other, or look out for each other, as they are on the same "team". So saying x wasn't into boys, y wasn't into girls, is no way to exclude them (I do tend to exclude BSVE, as he was a homosexual rapist, rather than a pedo)
One fact I haven't seen adressed- was there any confirmation of the BC eating and drinking in public?
It seems they vanished into thin air once they left Wenzels.
That's what pricked my eyes open, how could he get that sentence so wrong. Someone who claims he's
right up there and has solved the case, if only people would listen, and he comes out with a clanger like that.
It's laughable LOL
It was worded badlyHuh, it clearly means he was convicted of the crime he had committed a month before the Beaumonts.
Thats not saying he was tried and convicted of it a month before, it means he was convicted 50yrs after the event that actually took place a month before the beaumont abduction.
I find it more unbelievable that someone would misinterpret that and run with it to be honest.
Im fairly sure most people would know whats being said.It was worded badly
It’s highly likely this case will never be solved the lack of evidence and no bodies.
I think it will be solved one day; maybe not in our time though. Without going into my long-held theories on this case, l believe the children's bodies lie somewhere between Wenzels Cake shop and their home, probably almost as the crow flies.
Some day, a property will change hands, or be redeveloped, or gardens and sheds changed around, or it becomes a deceased estate. Three small bodies will be found, probably not far below the ground.
Can I please just bring this up?
If someone on here wants to bag me out in public, insult my previous avatar, and call me a BF leader, can you please
do it via private message. I don't know who you are and you don't know me, in no way have I ever taken over a
thread in a leader type of role!!
Don't have a go at me, I was just replying to Grey Crows post!!Huh, it clearly means he was convicted of the crime he had committed a month before the Beaumonts.
Thats not saying he was tried and convicted of it a month before, it means he was convicted 50yrs after the event that actually took place a month before the beaumont abduction.
I find it more unbelievable that someone would misinterpret that and run with it to be honest.
Well this person is quite vocal, the children were never murdered, they were taken to live new lives with a family that knew Mrs. Beaumont.It probably isn't anybody who engages in here at all Deni, this thread seems to be gossipped about a lot over social media for some reason.
What's come to light beyond our scope of comprehension anyway? LOL Nothing's going on, even the usual suspects have gone quiet.
Well this person is quite vocal, the children were never murdered, they were taken to live new lives with a family that knew Mrs. Beaumont.
They even think they have closed this section of the forum down, ie: we've all gone quiet, since they posted about them living in the country somewhere..
Me either!I saw that theory somewhere, it's one that's had quite a bit of air over the years and I don't think it's true.