Unsolved The Beaumont Children

[PenfoldsFan]

Don't have a go at me, I was just replying to Grey Crows post!!

"was convicted of violently raping Max's son a little over a month before the Beaumont kids disappeared.
He wasnt - he was convicted 50 years after they went missing"

Lol, It clearly means he was convicted of violently raping max's Son, a crime which took place a little over a month before the Beaumont's went missing.

Poorly constructed, yes, however, the point is clear to anyone with any knowledge of the case.

 

[GreyCrow]

Lol, It clearly means he was convicted of violently raping max's Son, a crime which took place a little over a month before the Beaumont's went missing.

Poorly constructed, yes, however, the point is clear to anyone with any knowledge of the case.

And that was my point. For many under 30 this is an historical case mostly garnered rom the media. This poor construction could steer people in the wrong direction

 

[Deni]

It's already been searched due to Bevan Spencer von Einem. No human remains found. The McIntyres aren't certain about Stansbury. Knowing the police wouldn't believe their Stansbury guess they've had to fabricate a positive sighting in the car boot. Myponga Dam was their back-up guess.

Of course there were no remains in the dam, if you had read it correctly it was said that Max and Co left the bodies in the dam for two weeks then fished them out, pardon the pun. So there was no trace of them in there when it was searched!
The McIntyers are certain about Stansbury, that is what the petition is about, to dig the well at Stansbury, this is what started this whole outlandish story about where the children are..
First seen in the car boot.
Next put in the dam.
Next taken to Stansbury and buried in the well..
All three things were alleged to have happened according to the Mc's!!

 

[sprockets]

Of course there were no remains in the dam, if you had read it correctly it was said that Max and Co left the bodies in the dam for two weeks then fished them out, pardon the pun. So there was no trace of them in there when it was searched!
The McIntyers are certain about Stansbury, that is what the petition is about, to dig the well at Stansbury, this is what started this whole outlandish story about where the children are..
First seen in the car boot.
Next put in the dam.
Next taken to Stansbury and buried in the well..
All three things were alleged to have happened according to the Mc's!!

Wonder when they'll come up with some, you know, evidence...

I haven't listened to this but might do so later

 

[Deni]

I haven't listened to this but might do so later

The beginning of that gave me the shivers LOL

 

[Macka_321]

Time to stop listening to the McIntyres like the police have. There all talk and have provided no evidence to support any of there claims. They don’t deserve anymore air time.

 

[Deni]

Time to stop listening to the McIntyres like the police have. There all talk and have provided no evidence to support any of there claims. They don’t deserve anymore air time.

Brillantly said!!

 

[Tues]

Time to stop listening to the McIntyres like the police have. There all talk and have provided no evidence to support any of there claims. They don’t deserve anymore air time.

I think they have run out of places to post their crap - even FB Crimestoppers have blocked them,lol.

 

[Redacted]

The Disappeared genealogy project

A collection of genealogical profiles related to The Disappeared

www.geni.com

I've added the Beaumont's to this genealogical project in case SA Police ever discover any remains, or even people who purport to be the Beaumont children, so that if they obtain genetic material, they can explore their trees to find living relatives to do comparison matching.

Anybody on geni.com is welcome to expand and correct any errors or merge their trees to common ancestors etc. Living people will generally show only as "private" except to close relatives.

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk

 

[IKE TURNER]

Derek percey who was a possible suspect should have been kept in a small cage until he talked but instead he sat in jail getting paid by his navy pension and having a great time until he died

 

[johnymac1]

Derek percey who was a possible suspect should have been kept in a small cage until he talked but instead he sat in jail getting paid by his navy pension and having a great time until he died

I think the Beaumont abductor is similar to Percy. Being a Sadist, and a Sexual offender and Predator

In other ways he might be very different. For instance our guy might be a family man.

 

[johnymac1]

For fifty five years we've been waiting for someone to come forward and say, something like ......"Ah I think my "Uncle Tom" was the abductor"
So why would someone make an accusation like that? why would his nephew "Little Jimmy" blurt out something like that?

The children disappeared with about 17 items, including towels and bags etc.

Lets say little Jimmy was playing in Toms shed and come across an old flight bag.. He's thinking to himself! Ahh.. but Toms never been on a flight.
He plays a bit more and finds a small white purse. Little Jimmy thinks again, out loud this time.. but there's been no females living here.. ever!
Jimmy is smart, he watched all of the true crime dramas and starts to search a bit deeper.
Looking through boxes he suddenly finds a load of newspaper clippings that feature disappearance of the Children and possibly the AO case.

Poor old Jimmy is a bit tired now, he continues to find things around the house that may indicate his Uncle Tom was a predator.
Jimmy is careful he puts back everything as he found it. including Toms pr0n collection. He also may have found clothing.

Jimmy gets a thought.. and remembers. Oh back in the summer of 66, Tom went on a sudden vacation, which lasted weeks, possibly months.
He looks again at the old newspaper clippings, he sees the identikit drawing of the suspect, then rushes inside and grabs an old pic of old Tom.. bingo
Toms pic, if Jimmy looked closer was taken at the kids school or church group or even at Glenelg beach

So where is Little Jimmy now and why hasn't he turned-in, his old Uncle Tom?

Some-one out there must have seen or noted something over the years

 

[newbie11]

Hey everyone,
I’m looking for some help, I’ve been working on giving the suspect sketch a more ‘humanised’ look..
But I’ve read so many conflicting info in regards to what the description actually is - ..
blonde hair?
Brown hair?
Hair needing a cut? Combed back neatly parted to the side?

Are we able to establish what the actual true description is?

This is what I’ve done so far

 

[Catoggio76]

Hey everyone,
I’m looking for some help, I’ve been working on giving the suspect sketch a more ‘humanised’ look..
But I’ve read so many conflicting info in regards to what the description actually is - ..
blonde hair?
Brown hair?
Hair needing a cut? Combed back neatly parted to the side?

Are we able to establish what the actual true description is?

This is what I’ve done so far View attachment 1267120

Sorry had to amuse my sarcasm for a split second

 

[Kurve]

Sorry had to amuse my sarcasm for a split second

He looks like Jerry Seinfeld?

 

[Catoggio76]

He looks like Jerry Seinfeld?

NO, more about giving the crook his copy of the report. The design sketch looks like Harry Phipps.

 

[newbie11]

NO, more about giving the crook his copy of the report. The design sketch looks like Harry Phipps.

NO, more about giving the crook his copy of the report. The design sketch looks like Harry Phipps.

Unfortunately your sarcasm wasn’t executed better, I could of maybe met you with banter if I didn’t believe that you may have mistakenly been to quick to sarcastically jump-the-gun.
There has been confusion around even the most basic facts of this case..
Maybe that’s evident by the fact that I’ve sought help to try and establish what the witness description even is.
I’m not an investigator, I do however enjoy art and I don’t think that painting a better picture of what the witnesses said they saw that day as being such a bad idea

 

[Kurve]

I’m not an investigator, I do however enjoy art and I don’t think that painting a better picture of what the witnesses said they saw that day as being such a bad idea

Looks pretty good.

 

[Catoggio76]

Unfortunately your sarcasm wasn’t executed better, I could of maybe met you with banter if I didn’t believe that you may have mistakenly been to quick to sarcastically jump-the-gun.
There has been confusion around even the most basic facts of this case..
Maybe that’s evident by the fact that I’ve sought help to try and establish what the witness description even is.
I’m not an investigator, I do however enjoy art and I don’t think that painting a better picture of what the witnesses said they saw that day as being such a bad idea

YOur sketch looks like Harry Phipps

 

[johnymac1]

Hey everyone,
I’m looking for some help, I’ve been working on giving the suspect sketch a more ‘humanised’ look..
But I’ve read so many conflicting info in regards to what the description actually is - ..
blonde hair?
Brown hair?
Hair needing a cut? Combed back neatly parted to the side?

Are we able to establish what the actual true description is?

This is what I’ve done so far View attachment 1267120

good work
I think the initial sketch artist aged the suspect by 10 years. According to witness statements they suggest he was between 20 and 30 yrs
the hair was swept from left to right as per fashion, but after swimming could be all pushed back

 

[johnymac1]

Looks pretty good.

the offender had no idea when he committed this crime the internet would be invented. Its rare to find person with no digital fingerprint.
from wedding photos, work photos, school photos, they all end up on the internet at some stage. we just needed a better sketch done in the 60s too match this guy. we can now get age regression in photography to see what he looking like 50yrs ago. hopefully we will catch this guy !

 

[johnymac1]

i

keep in mind there are two different faces in the original sketch, taking the younger one and flipping it on its self and taking out some shadow.
i need to do more work on it as the chin is too wide

 

[Bits]

In the original sketch the face is asymmetrical, as are most, if not all, faces in life. The eyes are clearly offset from each other. Your picture is looking great with the colour and shading, but flipping one side over a on itself brings the eyes too close together and narrows the nose.

 

[johnymac1]

In the original sketch the face is asymmetrical, as are most, if not all, faces in life. The eyes are clearly offset from each other. Your picture is looking great with the colour and shading, but flipping one side over a on itself brings the eyes too close together and narrows the nose.

yeah i rushed that, ill have another go

 

[newbie11]

i
View attachment 1268808
keep in mind there are two different faces in the original sketch, taking the younger one and flipping it on its self and taking out some shadow.
i need to do more work on it as the chin is too wide

So I used the original sketch as my base and then each part of the colouring is done is in seperate layers so that I keep everything as identical to the original as possible..
So I can send you the face without any of the contouring if you want?

There’s actually a software I use whenever any of the photos I receive are in need of any facial retouching.
it’s absolutely fantastic, it uses AI as well to give you complete control of everything down the smallest detail. It’s called PortraitPro

This is the aged photo that I got by putting it into FaceApp. Not a bad result really, although it seems gravity has decided to have very little - no effect at all on the upper part of his head lol so I guess all of that is gunna have to be done seperately