- Thread starter
- #26
Originally posted by ImperialPurple
Don't Ripper - you're embarrassing me....![]()
Sorry , I get a bit passionate sometimes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Originally posted by ImperialPurple
Don't Ripper - you're embarrassing me....![]()
Originally posted by RIPPER_46
Exactly , to get better we need 26+ players who deserve to be there.
We have an embarrasment of riches.
And it is going to get more embarrassing.![]()
Originally posted by Exeter
But you'd be well used to embarrassment by now.

Originally posted by Exeter
But you'd be well used to embarrassment by now.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Originally posted by RIPPER_46
Sorry , I get a bit passionate sometimes.
Originally posted by masai
Being so passionate, I assume you have been busy working on getting a good number of "leave passes" organised for the coming winter?.

LOL I don't mind it since we have been catching the train to the footy.The big smoke of Subi beckons you.
While I'm at it, I got grumpy this morning about leaving Parker out of the 18, now some clown (Sabre) says Macca's time is up. What do players have to do to satisfy some supporters. Macca's 2003 was VERY good (read consistent) and I am yet to see any sign off him being ready for the disgard pile.
Must be my PMS day ........................... grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Originally posted by ImperialPurple
At least we could laugh at ourselves during those dark days.
Originally posted by Kenny_01
I don't know which McManus Sabre was watching in 2003 but it wasn't Shaun McManus.

Originally posted by sabre_ac
Well guys once again I am the odd one out
But!
T Longmuir,Waterhouse and Parker deserve to be in the side.
I still have faith Waterhouse will bounce back and having him roaming around Medhurst,Longmuir and Polak would be sensational.
Parker I think is still serviceable as well.
Who makes way then?
Originally posted by RogerMellie
What has Clive done lately to '"deserve" a spot in the side? Saying he deserves it more than Macca is just batty.
Originally posted by Exeter
May you have a spanking good time.

Originally posted by sabre_ac
Well he deserves to be given a go.
We all know what he is capable of and surely that would have more of an impact than macca.
Originally posted by sabre_ac
Well guys once again I am the odd one out
But!
T Longmuir,Waterhouse and Parker deserve to be in the side.
I still have faith Waterhouse will bounce back and having him roaming around Medhurst,Longmuir and Polak would be sensational.
Parker I think is still serviceable as well.
Who makes way then?
Originally posted by Moo
I am a bit perplexed .... am I the only one that thinks TLo is in our best 22.
Yes he is a mongrel dog who runs around, but hey the boy fights for everything and we simply look better with wags in the forward line.
May be a bit much to start Dunn and a fit Thornton will give it a crack.
Moo
Originally posted by Kenny_01
I don't know which McManus Sabre was watching in 2003 but it wasn't Shaun McManus.
At the start of last season, I was questioning his worth also and thinking his spot was in real jeopardy but his 2003 was excellent. I would like to see him starting on a half forward flank in 2003.
Originally posted by masai
Dunn and Johnson have not played a senior game, are they that good or is the rest of our squad that bad. .
Originally posted by Freo Hitman
Some guy who comes in too see me at work has been watching training reguarly & is a very astute student of the game. He has told me Dunn & Micky J are da Bomb , They are class , skill , composure , the whole package rolled into one .
The question for your answer , they are that good.


