myblueroan
Premium Gold
Yeah thought it was Saad for a sec.Filters
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Yeah thought it was Saad for a sec.Filters
No poresYeah thought it was Saad for a sec.
I've said right from the beginning back when everyone was nominating Judd to be captain (in 2008), that Simpson was the better choice:
I have long felt Judd was the wrong captain.I actually think Judd was a fairly poor captain. Yeah he was captain in a premiership side but that side lead itself. He wasn't the sort of captain we needed at the time, we were desperate for a cultural shift and some strong leadership and discipline.
TBH his leadership was questionable. We played like a team at that was not strongly lead at the time. Soft, lazy conditional, front running, undisciplined were all words that described us and yes the commitment and effort was questionable and that all comes from lack of leadership pushing standards. It was a big part of Carlton's player development issues IMO. Leaders didn't drive high standards then and they way it looks nothing has changed. Strongly lead clubs surely don't get into so much off field trouble as well. Under Judd we were a mess off the field.
Then there were little things. Fevola was wasted on Brownlow night, Judd was there, should have put him in a taxi and sent him home but seemed to just ignore the issue until it became an issue. A good captain would have jumped on that and the way Fev took the piss out of Judd that night IMO showed how seriously he and probably the players probably took him. It was like didn't command respect. I think Judd tried to lead by example but wasn't out spoken or authoritarian enough to reign blokes in and command respect. Then there was the latest leadership feat from Judd as our football director, didn't seem to do much and walked out half way through the job. IMO he was a star player and a strong academic but lacks elite leadership qualities. Perhaps not good enough with confrontation.
Then there are the sacked coaches. A lot of that comes from players not buying in. If players don't buy in it doesn't mean the coach is in the wrong. A lot of the time it is because the leadership group doesn't back the coach and support them and reiterate their message. If the coach is pushing a message hard and the leadership group are pushing the same message hard the players have no choice but to buy in and have a crack.
Curnow, Simpson, Silvagni. These are the ones who should have been put forward as Captain without doubt.
Not sure Cripps has been very good so far either, a bit of a Judd style captain perhaps. I'm not seeing that effort and commitment is being driven from he and his leadership group. I could be wrong but I am not seeing strong leadership reflected in the way we play.
Carlton should hire Nick Maxwell to come in and talk with our leaders and playing group. He was an elite Captain and has made a career as a leadership consultant. IMO Voss and Diesel will be really good with this but this is an area we need to focus on because we haven't had a really good captain since Sticks.
Leadership and culture are things which need to be a focus.
I have long felt Judd was the wrong captain.
In fact I am sceptical that your best player should be your captain.
I think it's often a distraction for those who aren't natural leaders
On SM-A515F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I think pre injury and illness, Doc had plenty of it in him. I'd also argue Macca had plenty as well.A good captain has to have some see you next tuesday in them. I dont see that with Bradley, Koutta , Ratten , Mackay, Whitnall, Judd, Murphy,Cripps,Docherty
Then there were little things. Fevola was wasted on Brownlow night, Judd was there, should have put him in a taxi and sent him home but seemed to just ignore the issue until it became an issue. A good captain would have jumped on that and the way Fev took the piss out of Judd that night IMO showed how seriously he and probably the players probably took him. It was like didn't command respect. I think Judd tried to lead by example but wasn't out spoken or authoritarian enough to reign blokes in and command respect. Then there was the latest leadership feat from Judd as our football director, didn't seem to do much and walked out half way through the job. IMO he was a star player and a strong academic but lacks elite leadership qualities. Perhaps not good enough with confrontation.
I believe a number of people including Judd tried to get Fev out of there. Fev is a man child, he had no discipline, if he did he would be in the top 10 not #33 on the leading goal kickers list. The only way they would have got him out of there would have been to make a scene which could have got ugly. Channel 9 shouldn't have allowed him on air as he was intoxicated, pretty sure that would breach broadcasting contracts, but they knew what they were doing.
Judd may have not been a great captain in some ways but he did set a standard for the rest to follow, one man can not change a rotten culture, there has to be a buy in and the club is the figure head. If we had a strong culture, Fev would have been traded for Judd, not Kennedy. Fev got disciplined with a wet lettuce leaf for years and it finally blew up that night.
He did his leadership by example on field, but it was not what we needed at the time.
I think Parkin said something along the lines of this in regards to Fev. Something about being too lenient at the start. Club started to slip in regards to culture and leadership I think around the end of Parko's time there.
I think this sort of thing going bad happens easily. It's hard to come back from but very doable. I think all the talk about standards and getting that right at the moment leads back to getting leadership right at the club. If you want to get our standards higher then that comes back on those who push those standards and that's the coaching and leadership group.
I think it's important that leaders are taught to lead and that they have people they can go to for advice and that may be something which has been neglected at Carlton for some time.
Tonight I'm doing it for Doc and shaving my head. Tune in live from 6:30 pm
IF ...
you sack some people...
THEN ...
you have to replace them. And that doesn't mean - as per the fanciful claims of new president Luke Sayers' - that the Blues are a destination club.
Another 'Top Class' post by Damo...
Sliding Doors: IF you sack some people ... THEN
Damo lets rip with his final Sliding Doors for 2021www.afl.com.au
How about;
IF ...
you are a journalist with an ounce of integrity...
THEN ...
you have to put childish vendettas and personal bias aside, and admit - that the Blues are a destination club.
But Dorito made all the right moves…. Spare me!Damo is so the past bullied boy now enjoying some status and passing on the bullying in his own twerp way.