crazywildhorse
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Posts
- 12,531
- Reaction score
- 17,655
- Location
- The Netherlands
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Baggy Green
Can anyone on this forum explain to me why Australia keep persisting with Watson?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 0
SuperCoach Rd 0 - The Throw Up SC Talk - Rate My Team - Injuries - SC Leagues ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 0 AFF Talk - Preseason 2026 - Rate My Team
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don't think he didDid he hit that? Got the father-in-law here prattling on about cosmology....
Nope. Didn't hit. The 3rd umpire can't even get it right. Joke.
Third umpire made the call. Tony hill has shafted us here.Hang on, then why's he out? Did the third umpire **** it up? Or was it some sort of 'umpires call' crap?
Could have been a feather, but inconclusive.... Surely benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman
One of the basic tenet's of the game as been thrown out the window with the DRS crap.
And all for what?... To stop an umpire from being embarrassed. All a bit in vein reallyIt's one of the reasons I hate it so much.
I mean the whole notion that reviews are tactical, that you can have an advantage over the umpiring and the game, because of when and how you use them, is patently absurd.
When the system fails to be used to rectify howlers, like Rogers decisions, or shoot out batsmen who where clearly out, like Broad, the system fails in my eyes.
And my personal favourite, where the margin for error on an LBW can be less depending on whether it's the umpires call.
It's bullshit.
And all for what?... To stop an umpire from being embarrassed. All a bit in vein really
For the 10th wicket?Will we make 150?
Hahaha we can only dreamFor the 10th wicket?
Sums up our problems there.Four of the top six faced 35, 41, 42 & 45 balls.