- Thread starter
- #226
I'm not Quigley, but I think your post can be boiled down to this. The net result is that they are not good enough IN YOUR OPINION. I hold differing ones. By the looks of Quigley's post he holds different ones. I'm willing to bet that the club holds different ones, given I bet they don't delist everyone on your list(s) at the end of the year.
Collier I can see becoming a good enough player, and would offer him an extra year to see if he can step up. Hawksley has shown more than enough, and if he could remove the brain fades that seem to invariably lead to opposition goals (or played further away from our defense) would be a useful player. Selwood I agree with. Stiller I'm 50/50 on, as he's looked relatively solid in the last month but I'm not hugely sold on keeping him anyway. Sheldon I'm also 50/50 on. I'd like to see an extra year of him, but he seems to have regressed over the last year. Austin would go because he doesn't seem to put any pressure on to be selected.
Not to mention some of your delistings are crazy because you seem to want to throw out any key position player that hasn't made an impact within two years when they generally take longer to develop.
Well done for realising that writing in a forum is ones' opinion
Also, your softness on the players you've listed above is exactly what I meant by some Lion supporters accepting mediocrity and wanting to give players obviously not good enough to represent our jumper more time on the list. What do you think is going to happen, suddenly they are going to become great players after time and time again showing us they are in fact the opposite
As for your comment on KPP's - the only one is McCulloch who was a speculative pick a few years back and has had one injury after another without even playing AFL; do we wait 6 years and then delist???






- I think the risk is worth it 





