SJ
Premium Platinum
Yesterday I was in a situation where I had three base-level reserved seat tickets to Geelong v Gold Coast (face value $29 each) which could no longer be used. I am a member, so had no need for them either. They were bought legitimately.
Obviously with no need for them, I would rather they were put to good use, so I had planned to get to the footy early and try to find someone to sell them too at a significant discount ($50 maybe) to the face value ($87 prior to booking fees). I had been under the impression that any sale of tickets at or below the face value is legal in this state, as I can't see any cost to society or any reason for its banning.
Because it wasn't really a high-demand game, the queues at the ticket windows were pretty short and I wanted to make sure it didn't look like I was up to anything shady. So I told a ground attendant about my situation; I was happy to get rid of them at a personal loss to myself, and how someone else might as well use them, however I didn't to do anything illegal.
At this point a security guard walked up, and I explained the same situation. He told me that any sale of the tickets would be scalping. I asked even if sold at face value? He said yes. I asked even if sold at a discount to face value? He said yes. I asked him about the definition of scalping, but he couldn't really tell me (he didn't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed). I asked what would happen if I sold them for $0.00 (free), and he just said "make sure you do it away from my sight".
Then I went and asked some nearby police the same question. Seemingly the most senior cop there reiterated what the security guard said, and told me any exchange of tickets for cash is scalping (however he had never charged anyone with this act).
Not wanting to end up charged, I moved away to another area. In the end I gave the tickets away for nothing.
I still don't believe there is anything wrong with selling tickets at or below face value. I understand in Victoria there are 'declared events' (such as AFL Grand Final and Cricket World Cup) where on-selling is banned, but this match would certainly not have been one of those.
Can anyone help me out here? Was I right or wrong?
Obviously with no need for them, I would rather they were put to good use, so I had planned to get to the footy early and try to find someone to sell them too at a significant discount ($50 maybe) to the face value ($87 prior to booking fees). I had been under the impression that any sale of tickets at or below the face value is legal in this state, as I can't see any cost to society or any reason for its banning.
Because it wasn't really a high-demand game, the queues at the ticket windows were pretty short and I wanted to make sure it didn't look like I was up to anything shady. So I told a ground attendant about my situation; I was happy to get rid of them at a personal loss to myself, and how someone else might as well use them, however I didn't to do anything illegal.
At this point a security guard walked up, and I explained the same situation. He told me that any sale of the tickets would be scalping. I asked even if sold at face value? He said yes. I asked even if sold at a discount to face value? He said yes. I asked him about the definition of scalping, but he couldn't really tell me (he didn't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed). I asked what would happen if I sold them for $0.00 (free), and he just said "make sure you do it away from my sight".
Then I went and asked some nearby police the same question. Seemingly the most senior cop there reiterated what the security guard said, and told me any exchange of tickets for cash is scalping (however he had never charged anyone with this act).
Not wanting to end up charged, I moved away to another area. In the end I gave the tickets away for nothing.
I still don't believe there is anything wrong with selling tickets at or below face value. I understand in Victoria there are 'declared events' (such as AFL Grand Final and Cricket World Cup) where on-selling is banned, but this match would certainly not have been one of those.
Can anyone help me out here? Was I right or wrong?
Last edited: