
Kurve
Moderator
- Dec 27, 2016
- 12,824
- 28,960
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
1. I'm talking about R&M's Stogneff theory.What theory's mental? If there's bite marks anywhere along the edges of skin breaks or in raw flesh the cops would probably have to note the missing parts might have been eaten. Tip, if they raid anybody's house to check the fridge/freezer.
Unfortunately, Rachel will probably rob and distort the cops cannibal theory when she sees it, to support her story that eating abducted people and selling whatever's left to the local butcher was routine. Urgh.
Okay, got it.1. I'm talking about R&M's Stogneff theory.
2. When I say mental - I mean out there, but probably close to the truth.
Rachel Vaughan from clan McIntyre.Who is Rachel? Someone from Case Files?
I'll have a look see if I can find out how long their researcher/writer Jessica Forsayeth has been with Casefile, it's changed a couple of times.I listened to the first 10 minutes of the podcast. This is where this thread as in 2013-ish. A lot of that stuff was all over the internet back then and has since been debunked (or been all but ruled out) in this very thread.
Some of the inaccuracies are from articles from around the time it happened (which always have inaccuracies), and some come from Chinese whispers either from these articles, or from new articles with flawed interpretations.Edit: They're mixing it up now, she researches and writes but doesn't always contribute writing as she did on this pod.
I wonder how that would fit in with Noel Brook supposedly being the abductor if the witness statement was correct and it was PS she saw in the coffee shop. Was Brook building trust with PS so he could take him outside where BVE was waiting? In which case were BVE, Brook and possibly others driving looking for victims and saw Peter walking to Tea Tree Plaza? Or was BVE possibly not even aware of it and Brook instead "went rogue" and took Peter back to his house of his own accord, assuming BVE would be pleased and give him some of his drugs as a reward? In which case BVE could have a solid alibi and still be responsible.Does anyone know whether the police questioned BVE in regards to PS disappearance?
The fact he was abducted on a school day would of allowed the Police to establish if BVE was present at his work that day.
Surely the Police would have sought alibis from all the high profile names linked to this case, or had the horse already bolted by this stage?
So many questions we don't have the answer to but I've got a strong inkling many things were missed.Does anyone know whether the police questioned BVE in regards to PS disappearance?
The fact he was abducted on a school day would of allowed the Police to establish if BVE was present at his work that day.
Surely the Police would have sought alibis from all the high profile names linked to this case, or had the horse already bolted by this stage?
Yes I remember thatCasefile quotes Charlie following on from Detective Superintendent Grant Moyle's appeal to those with knowledge of the murders. Beginning at around 96.10.
It was a sentiment echoed by Alan Barnes's brother Charlie, who said of those responsible 'I would like them to shed the guilt and remorse they must be carrying around and come forward and bring this to a conclusion. I know the police are like bulldogs and will not let go of this. They may well tap you on the shoulder one day.'
Don't under estimate the incompetence of Govt Departments.It seems almost impossible to me that once they started uncovering BVE's social circle not one person investigating noticed the similarities in the witness statement to Brook yet 40 years later 2 authors just happened to notice. Surely someone at the time had to notice that and interview Brook, even if he denied it was him
Are we just assuming human bite marks? Possibly it may be that Neil’s body parts and other missing organs were fed to an animal. Dog perhaps?The ebook mentions a butcher several times but doesn't really go anywhere with it. I've seen mention elsewhere of a butcher selling human meat for consumption. (Somewhere in the McIntyre saga maybe?).
But it's a huge leap from that scenario to biting chunks of raw flesh straight off a corpse. I think we'd all remember that if we'd read it before.
Fair point, but pathologists would know the difference (hopefully) and it should have been specified in whatever source they used.Are we just assuming human bite marks? Possibly it may be that Neil’s body parts and other missing organs were fed to an animal. Dog perhaps?
It probably came from Pooca.Fair point, but pathologists would know the difference (hopefully) and it should have been specified in whatever source they used.
I’d love to know the source.
I am going to ask major crime about this . I do think there was something in a paper years ago but it may have been one of Peter harons stories and I think you all know what same of his stories were like .Fair point, but pathologists would know the difference (hopefully) and it should have been specified in whatever source they used.
Given that a lot of us are all over the public details of these crimes, surely if this info was available we would have heard of it. I’d love to know the source.
Do you think you could get the 60 minutes video?Who has seen the reenactment of Alan on grand junction road ? The cops showed a ht Holden not a hq
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
No the one the cops used and showed . It was a ht square tail lights . That is why I said ht before . They only said a white Holden kingswood when talking about it in the voice over but used a ht not a hq . This was back before any of the murders were connected. Very early 80s . I think it was before RK was found but just after he went missing. They knew by then that there was a connection between them all.Do you think you could get the 60 minutes video?
Have they responded to you yet? Then again, probably have to wait for business hours.On the bitemarks, Jessica Forsayeth isn't hard to find but Casefile is on facebook, twitter and instagram.
If they had responded, I'd let you know but I haven't asked yet. I'm still looking through their resources.Have they responded to you yet? Then again, probably have to wait for business hours.
I don’t have it but same here said they did . They want to put it on YouTube if I understood them rightDo you think you could get the 60 minutes video?
I can ring 9 and ask if I can get a copy . See how I goThat 60 minutes episode is very elusive. Some of us have been trying to find it for years. If anyone has it, please post a link - doesn’t matter how bad the quality is.
Neil Muir was also taken on a school or work day, a Monday and he was found on the Tuesday. Given the similarities in the dismemberments of Stogneff and Muir, I'd like to know a bit more about Didi and confirmation of where he was living when Neil Muir was murdered. I'm thinking it might have been the Alberton address.Does anyone know whether the police questioned BVE in regards to PS disappearance?
The fact he was abducted on a school day would of allowed the Police to establish if BVE was present at his work that day.
Surely the Police would have sought alibis from all the high profile names linked to this case, or had the horse already bolted by this stage?