RookiePick
Brownlow Medallist
- Aug 13, 2014
- 26,538
- 47,307
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Anyone full bottle on how the tribunal works?
As I understand it you can't use previous cases as precedent, OK fair enough, but can you cross-examine witnesses? I'm just thinking the Eagles' QC missed a trick by not examining details of the medical report; in that it whether the jaw was broken (media sensationalism) or fractured. Whether the break/fracture could have been caused by the teeth moving. Whether or not it takes less force to dislodge teeth than break a jaw. Whether or not there is likely to be more blood due to teeth being dislodged.
Even if that's not the case where was the breakdown that shows that if Gaff was aiming for the chest how impossible it is to change direction after noticing the chest has not moved...
TBH I think it was a pretty rubbish showing from the Eagles' legal counsel, and now Gaff has a bigger suspension than a thug whose aim was to knock out his opponnent, and equal to that of another thug whose complete aim was to elbow his opponent in the head. Ergo, Gaff is now a thug.
I feel like Grace has lost his edge a bit. I'm pretty sure he misspoke at the last tribunal as well iirc.