W
Wayne 'loser' Jackson
Guest
I've come up with a final 6 system. It is unfair to some but it is the best I could do.
Let's have a practice run.
WEEK 1: QF.
5 v 6. Let's assume 5 wins. 6 bows out.
3 v 4. Let's say 4 wins. 3 has another chance.
1 and 2 have week off.
WEEK 2: SF.
1 v 4. Let's assume that 1 wins. 4 has another chance.
2 v 5. Say 2 wins. 5 is out of it.
3 has week off.
WEEK 3: PF.
2 v 4. 2 wins but 4 bows out as they lose.
1 v 3. 1 wins but 3 bows out as they lose.
WEEK 4: GF.
1v2. Winner gets the premiership!!
Now some notes.
* At no stage in the draw does 1 play 2, except maybe in the grand final.
* 1 and 2 get first week off.
* It's sudden death for 5 and 6 in the first week.
*Team 1 doesn't have a huge advantage over the rest of the teams.
* Teams 5 and 6 have it harder than 1,2, 3 and 4 to make it fairer.
Does anyone like it?
Let's have a practice run.
WEEK 1: QF.
5 v 6. Let's assume 5 wins. 6 bows out.
3 v 4. Let's say 4 wins. 3 has another chance.
1 and 2 have week off.
WEEK 2: SF.
1 v 4. Let's assume that 1 wins. 4 has another chance.
2 v 5. Say 2 wins. 5 is out of it.
3 has week off.
WEEK 3: PF.
2 v 4. 2 wins but 4 bows out as they lose.
1 v 3. 1 wins but 3 bows out as they lose.
WEEK 4: GF.
1v2. Winner gets the premiership!!
Now some notes.
* At no stage in the draw does 1 play 2, except maybe in the grand final.
* 1 and 2 get first week off.
* It's sudden death for 5 and 6 in the first week.
*Team 1 doesn't have a huge advantage over the rest of the teams.
* Teams 5 and 6 have it harder than 1,2, 3 and 4 to make it fairer.
Does anyone like it?