Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[Total Power]

Planets don't exist hey GG.exe?

You are officially "Off the planet."

I mean surely they are not sure serious you would assume We are living in a star! holy shit

 

[PoppedCorn]

Everything technically is given to us from someone else.
And it wouldn't surprise me if some aspect of some of the whole story had a bit of fact......a smidgen.......somewhere

The dot....is that the vortex?
That Hoagland talked about.

 

[exe ex machina]

Everything technically is given to us from someone else.
And it wouldn't surprise me if some aspect of some of the whole story had a bit of fact......a smidgen.......somewhere

The dot....is that the vortex?
That Hoagland talked about.

People like you are GOLD. Open minded, understand the overlords of the earth often lie and fabricate realities to keep humanity enslaved and stupid, but also a skeptic. Someone always willing to PLAY in topics.

Whereas a lot of the people against in this debate (not all but a lot) are just DIMES PENNIES AND NICKELS. They scoff at everything, heads buried in the sand, afraid even to approach the possibility that everything they know could be lies, and in topics they don't PLAY in it, they seldom if ever actually watch/read the stuff presented. No matter how iffy the info might be, people should still watch/read. It's so disrespectful to the people presenting the info. Because they/we don't know all the answers either and are seeking discussion about bits and pieces of info presented. But so often they don't even bother but want to continue to disparage the argument FOR something.

 

[exe ex machina]

The earth isn't a star. The contention is that the earth is a planetary domain, and planets in it merely "wandering stars". A different type of entity for what reason we don't know. Where the earth is the center of a system, geocentricity, flat possibly, expressly created as such (biblical connotations) (perhaps gnostic in detail), that the earth is a prison, a testing ground for human souls. A literal diorama, all veiled from us. And the overlords who rule this planet keep us in check and veer us away from the (biblical/gnostic connotations).

It's a valid theory. Especially when you start seeing so much NASA fakery. Those videos with great detail and visual examples of green screen use, permed hair versus real hair in zero g, how zero planes have the same stability bars and bounce around effect, all the water bubbles and admissions of water almost killing an ISS astronot, the images of earth changing from one year to the next about the size of the continents, and many many other anomalies and bullshit that all those videos go into greater detail on specific to NASA and all other space programs fakery. When you truly SEE the fakery, one after the other....You will start approaching the possibility that something is up. Theres a concerted effort. It's a PRESTIGE going on, in magic show terms.

 

[Procrastinator35]

I mean surely they are not sure serious you would assume We are living in a star! holy shit

It's good practise on lateral thinking & argumentation skills....One must bring a 360 degree perspective in order to debunk the flat-heads.

GG & cannot are doing us all a good service & favor here.

But yeah....Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler & Newton....All madmen on mushrooms & other assorted hallucinogens.

 

[PoppedCorn]

People like you are GOLD. Open minded, understand the overlords of the earth often lie and fabricate realities to keep humanity enslaved and stupid, but also a skeptic. Someone always willing to PLAY in topics.

Whereas a lot of the people against in this debate (not all but a lot) are just DIMES PENNIES AND NICKELS. They scoff at everything, heads buried in the sand, afraid even to approach the possibility that everything they know could be lies, and in topics they don't PLAY in it, they seldom if ever actually watch/read the stuff presented. No matter how iffy the info might be, people should still watch/read. It's so disrespectful to the people presenting the info. Because they/we don't know all the answers either and are seeking discussion about bits and pieces of info presented. But so often they don't even bother but want to continue to disparage the argument FOR something.

I understand that it's all a game and all created
I started with icke tsarion Jones etc and moved on reasonably quickly after being quite active in those forums, if anyone remembers the original icke forum before it was even really affiliated with icke.
No holds barred in that place
After that it all went down hill on forums, plus I know icke is a shill.....
I also used to quite frequently chat with some people who were involved with Alan watt....the Canadian guy at cuttingthruthematrx.

I don't dismiss anything GG.EXE
Because anything is possible

Carry on
Ignore what and who u need to

 

[Nothing]

On this plate, Perth and Chile are diametrically opposed and about as far apart as you can get (except the Antarctic "Ice Wall"). Perth to Chile (SCL - Santiago precisely) has flights via Sydney with air time of 16 hours. It should also include the flight path passing over (or close to North America).
Meanwhile Perth to Tokyo is 13 hours flight time and doesn't even get to the "hub". So Tokyo to Chile should only be a few hours?

Tokyo to SCL is 22 hours VIA SYDNEY. Why are we flying BACK to Sydney to get to Chile? OK, we'll try a different airline. Clearly QANTAS aren't a good airline and warp time and space. How about we fly the "right" way and go via North America. We'll fly to Toronto in Air Canada, we'd be passing over the top of it normally. Here, we once again end up with a flight time of 22 hours.

I put a lot of time and effort into this post hoping it could be debunked. Perhaps I needed to make a youtube video with spooky music.

 

[EagleShore]

I put a lot of time and effort into this post hoping it could be debunked. Perhaps I needed to make a youtube video with spooky music.

Surely the quickest path from Perth to Chile would be the over Antarctica. Maybe it's not a popular enough flight to warrant not going via Sydney.

On GT-I9507 using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Nothing]

Surely the quickest path from Perth to Chile would be the over Antarctica. Maybe it's not a popular enough flight to warrant not going via Sydney.

On GT-I9507 using BigFooty.com mobile app

But you can't fly over Antarctica, because that's the outer rim. You'd fly into the icewall, or get shot down trying. So you have to fly via Sydney.

Beyond that, how and why do the rest of the flights not add up on a plate world. Why do they fly from Tokyo to Sydney to get to Chile? Why does Tokyo to Chile take longer than Tokyo to Perth and Perth to Chile?

 

[PoppedCorn]

must be a lot of pilots keeping shmum
surely someone wouldve figured this out by now
?

 

[EagleShore]

Apparently there are operational concerns flying over the poles - principally the cold which can affect fuel systems.

I want to watch vids about the flat earth like the moon landings but there's too much evidence that suggests the earth is a globe and we landed on the moon, and I value my time.

This is unlike 9/11, in which there is more evidence for it being a big lie. The official account makes no sense when you understand how the world works (money, war, resources).

On GT-I9507 using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[PoppedCorn]

frozen fuel huh.

always comes back to the jet fuel

 

[exe ex machina]

Military planes seem to do just fine flying over the Antarctic.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Must be a lot of pilots keeping shmum. Surely someone would've figured this out by now?

It's all been 'figured-out' well & truly already....It's only the flat-heads who are in a twirl over it....Who see complexity where there is none.

 

[PoppedCorn]

like I said im open to most stuff weird.......still yet to dig into this massively az I dont actually have massive amounts of data via the internet avl to me.

but ill never dismiss anythinv just coz it sounds stupid weird or ceazy

 

[Procrastinator35]

like I said im open to most stuff weird.......still yet to dig into this massively az I dont actually have massive amounts of data via the internet avl to me.

But ill never dismiss anything just coz it sounds stupid, weird or crazy

Well Trump is Prez, so I guess you have a point.

 

[PoppedCorn]

yup I wouldve lost the house on that one
was 100% sure they were going to continue the bloodline and put clinton in

and seeing as I don't believe in the whole voting thing being real im still not quite sure why trump was put in tbh
few theories but nothing im settling on 100%

but I digress
carry on 'discussing' the flat thingy

 

[exe ex machina]

I defy any disbelievers to watch this 5 minute video ALL THE WAY THRU, and NOT SEE nasa's fakery. I mean wow, there's even a new one I hadnt seen before that totally blows this bullshit out of the water...

 

[exe ex machina]

and this too, excellent point!!

 

[Procrastinator35]

I defy any disbelievers to watch this 5 minute video ALL THE WAY THRU, and NOT SEE nasa's fakery. I mean wow, there's even a new one I hadnt seen before that totally blows this bullshit out of the water...

Doesn't prove the earth is flat....Just that NASA are poor directors.

 

[Total Power]

and this too, excellent point!!

Are you kidding me? a video with charlie chaplin music behind it with points like midnight sun, which been debunked in this very thread already? also states sun is travelling in a CIRCULAR path. All pictures are edited to make it look straight. But if we show you the curvature, obviously its fish eye lens lol good one bro. You will not accept evidence if its given to you. Travel on a boat, from the melbourne coast, a few miles, the city will appear to be sinking.

You can see ISS through your telescope, so what is it that they are claiming we never left the earth? how is possible to have satellite tv's, phones, gps then? how would a gps work without a satellite? a gps is 100 percent correct, i use it all the time when i travel, its impossible without a satellite.

 

[katana]

You can even watch ISS through your home telescope. Just try for once.

you can see a structure, lights, in the sky. that does not mean that there are these men inside of it who're magically floating in 'zero gravity'. the only evidence you have for men inside those lights is video footage i.e. you must be taking it on faith.

 

[NEGAN]

 

[Catfish Alley]

What's underneath on the other side? Lizard people? Is the sun a flat disc too?

 

[cannot]

What's underneath on the other side? Lizard people? Is the sun a flat disc too?