- Joined
- Aug 19, 2004
- Posts
- 36,032
- Reaction score
- 15,149
- Location
- Grand Finals
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Team Rafael Nadal
I have no problem with you or your line of enquiry on this board. Just simply proposing that burden of proof is with flowers to prove the globe. Just like the Obama thread, burden of proof is to prove she's a woman.
Can i get an answer to the question? The things we see perfectly fits a round earth model, it does NOT fit a flat earth model.
There are millions of pictures taken by thousands of different satellites from different countries, including amateurs on youtube proving the earth is round. describe how it's possible that so many photos could be so SEVERELY distorted by a regular lens so as to make a flat object look round, with parts of it fully behind other parts of it and not exposed to the camera, while objects adjacent to it are hardly distorted at all.
If you're willing to accept even one photo of anything ever at all (that you didn't take yourself), why are photos of the round earth excluded?







