Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[WCE1987]

Yes,that's correct,when we observe them they are there,it's perception. You will notice that when you stop looking you will no longer be able to see them. Some believe they only exist under observation,it's science.

Please understand,there is no gravity,it's a hoax.
Humans,and other animals for that matter cannot survive on a ball,that is why our planet is flat.

By that logic ice walls don't exist because we are not observing them

 

[darthbards]

By that logic ice walls don't exist because we are not observing them

Good point.
The ice wall does exist though as its on the flat earth.
Some of my colleagues do agree with your theory.
We're still learning which is why science is so great.

 

[WCE1987]

Good point.
The ice wall does exist though as its on the flat earth.
Some of my colleagues do agree with your theory.
We're still learning which is why science is so great.

The sun isn't on earth does that exist?

 

[Procrastinator35]

Yes,that's correct,when we observe them they are there,it's perception. You will notice that when you stop looking you will no longer be able to see them. Some believe they only exist under observation,it's science.

Please understand,there is no gravity,it's a hoax.
Humans,and other animals for that matter cannot survive on a ball,that is why our planet is flat.

It's all about ratio's, scale & perspective, I'd of thought.....It certainly 'seems' flat to us, from our human scale of perspective. Though the size of the earth means that the degree of slant necessary for the global claim, would be imperceptible to the human eye & senses....That sheer size & scale of the earth's mass & circumference, means that it's spinning eliptical orbit also remains imperceptible to the human senses, though certainly not inconceivable.

The spinning orb is also lent credence via the seasons & the rise & fall of the sun everyday.

 

[pantskyle]

It's all about ratio's, scale & perspective, I'd of thought.....It certainly 'seems' flat to us, from our human scale of perspective. Though the size of the earth means that the degree of slant necessary for the global claim, would be imperceptible to the human eye & senses....That sheer size & scale of the earth's mass & circumference, means that it's spinning eliptical orbit also remains imperceptible to the human senses, though certainly not inconceivable.

The spinning orb is also lent credence via the seasons & the rise & fall of the sun everyday.

Ball lover.

 

[darthbards]

The sun isn't on earth does that exist?

Yes the sun exists as we can see its rays. The sun has a circumference of approximately 30 miles. The shadow objects circumference is approximately 8 miles.

 

[darthbards]

It's all about ratio's, scale & perspective, I'd of thought.....It certainly 'seems' flat to us, from our human scale of perspective. Though the size of the earth means that the degree of slant necessary for the global claim, would be imperceptible to the human eye & senses....That sheer size & scale of the earth's mass & circumference, means that it's spinning eliptical orbit also remains imperceptible to the human senses, though certainly not inconceivable.

The spinning orb is also lent credence via the seasons & the rise & fall of the sun everyday.

The sun doesn't actually rise and fall. As it rotates the North Pole it just travels out and then back within our horizontal perception.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Ball lover.

 

[WCE1987]

But the moon doesn't have rays or cast a shadow, does that exist as well?

I just don't understand how we can perceive the sun from earth and that gets a tick, however our observation of planets doesn't. Both are not on earth, both perceivable from earth.

If the sun admits "rays" then it would have to go through atmosphere, and atmospheres only exist with gravity, otherwise nothing would hold the gases in like oxygen for us to perceive rays through.

 

[spookism]

So I'm planning on doing a round the world trip soon - should I be worried?

 

[darthbards]

But the moon doesn't have rays or cast a shadow, does that exist as well?

I just don't understand how we can perceive the sun from earth and that gets a tick, however our observation of planets doesn't. Both are not on earth, both perceivable from earth.

If the sun admits "rays" then it would have to go through atmosphere, and atmospheres only exist with gravity, otherwise nothing would hold the gases in like oxygen for us to perceive rays through.

I think your confusing the lied about moon to the actual moon. The moon does actually cast its own light.
The moon is also the same size as the sun.

 

[darthbards]

So I'm planning on doing a round the world trip soon - should I be worried?

Lol,you can still travel around the earth in a circular motion.
You have no reason to be concerned.
Enjoy your trip,plenty of beautiful sights on our flat planet.

 

[spookism]

Lol,you can still travel around the earth in a circular motion.
You have no reason to be concerned.
Enjoy your trip,plenty of beautiful sights on our flat planet.

I'm just more upset at how much QANTAS are charging me for not even going the distance they are advertising.

 

[darthbards]

I'm just more upset at how much QANTAS are charging me for not even going the distance they are advertising.

I think your confused by science.
Just enjoy your trip,I'm sure you will have a ball. The way you were talking though I thought you were going by boat. In a plane you are able to fly over land.
At the FES we do not support airlines such as QUANTAS but have no issue with members outside our organisation using commercial aircraft in the persuit of leisure activities.

 

[exe ex machina]

I'm just more upset at how much QANTAS are charging me for not even going the distance they are advertising.

If you flew Malaysia Airlines you'd definitely get charged and not go the entire distance.

 

[spookism]

I think your confused by science.
Just enjoy your trip,I'm sure you will have a ball. The way you were talking though I thought you were going by boat. In a plane you are able to fly over land.
At the FES we do not support airlines such as QUANTAS but have no issue with members outside our organisation using commercial aircraft in the persuit of leisure activities.

If you flew Malaysia Airlines you'd definitely get charged and not go the entire distance.

Woah... too soon.

 

[Procrastinator35]

The sun doesn't actually rise and fall. As it rotates the North Pole it just travels out and then back within our horizontal perception.

Here you go Darthy.....All for you m8.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parmenides

"In "the way of truth" (a part of the poem), he explains how reality (coined as "what-is") is one, change is impossible, and existence is timeless, uniform, necessary, and unchanging. In "the way of opinion", he explains the world of appearances, in which one's sensory faculties lead to conceptions which are false and deceitful."

 

[WCE1987]

I think your confusing the lied about moon to the actual moon. The moon does actually cast its own light.
The moon is also the same size as the sun.

lol wat
No its really not, you would have to ignore math for that to be true.
http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/AtHomeAstronomy/activity_03.html
http://www.dummies.com/education/ma...-the-distance-to-the-moon-using-trigonometry/
You would then need to disprove math on all shapes.

 

[WCE1987]

I think your confusing the lied about moon to the actual moon. The moon does actually cast its own light.
The moon is also the same size as the sun.

You also ignored my comments on atmosphere or are we saying there is no atmosphere? That fact you are commenting on "light' proves the existence of atmosphere and therefore gravity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_refraction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_optics

 

[exe ex machina]

Planes rely on an "Artificial Horizon", which is created utilizing gyro's. Gyros remain fixed and level when they are set on the ground prior to take off. So if the earth were a ball, this line would be a tangent to the earth's curved surface, and within two hours at 550 mph, a pilot would find himself out of the atmosphere. The magic god "Gravity" does not overcome the effect of a gyro. So either you are dipping the nose down ~270 feet every minute (with no one feeling this downward acceleration) or the earth is flat. And if "Gravity": How does gravity know exactly how much force to apply to the plane, when planes fly at different altitudes, weigh less as they go along as they are burning fuel, air density changes, winds aloft change, affecting lift, etc, etc. And how can "Gravity" hold trillions of tons of water and the atmosphere glued exactly to the ball earth so we sense no motion but yet we can feel the slightest westward breeze, and it still allows smoke to rise and flies to fly? Give up your false god "Gravity".

 

[brahj]

I wonder when we'll get a patch to update the lousy depth of field we're currently stuck with.

 

[Quivorir]

Yes,that's correct,when we observe them they are there,it's perception. You will notice that when you stop looking you will no longer be able to see them. Some believe they only exist under observation,it's science.

This is the greatest thing I have ever read.

 

[exe ex machina]

Gravity DOES NOT exist as such. It is a HOAX commonly taught as truth, just like globe ball earth. Yet what does the hoax hide you may ask? Well it hides what is known as the SCALAR COMPONENT OF MAGNETISM. Magnetism has 3 components, not just the two commonly taught (positive negative), and the third is the longitudinal waves known as the scalar. Hard to get facts on this mostly, yet you may go here for extra information which should corroborate.

 

[spookism]

This is the greatest thing I have ever read.

 

[spookism]

I'm atheist and believe in gravity... I feel a weird juxtaposition here.