Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[JackOutback]

How is there no upside down on a sphere? You know even despite gravity, insects still require super strength sticky hands and feet to walk upside down without falling off the little rocks and plants they inhabit.

A sphere is symmetric, that is, it looks the same no matter what way you look at it. The people you think are walking upside down have just as much right to think you are walking upside down.

 

[exe ex machina]

A sphere is symmetric, that is, it looks the same no matter what way you look at it. The people you think are walking upside down have just as much right to think you are walking upside down.

Youre not making any sense.

 

[darthbards]

Youre not making any sense.

He's clearly brainwashed. You only have to look at the moon or the sun and you can see it has upside down and sides.
We can't exist like that which is evidence the earth is flat.

 

[NEGAN]

Youre not making any sense.

On a spherical model there is a down (centre of the Earth) and up is only relative to your position on Earth.


.

 

[Boston tiger]

Well you keep asking what's underneath the flat earth... so I ask you what is gravity since it's part of your religion. You should know this. People went around the world, using gravity in your reality...Why don't you know what it is?

I don't give a crap about gravity. This is the flat earth thread. The earth has been explored , mapped etc .

 

[JackOutback]

He's clearly brainwashed. You only have to look at the moon or the sun and you can see it has upside down and sides.
We can't exist like that which is evidence the earth is flat.

Can you point me to the 'sides'?

 

[exe ex machina]

On a spherical model there is a down (centre of the Earth) and up is only relative to your position on Earth.


.

Itd still be a round rock where people live on the surface of the rock. So still a case of...

 

[NEGAN]

Itd still be a round rock where people live on the surface of the rock. So still a case of...

View attachment 389081

He is just parroting what we all been taught...

 

[NEGAN]

I don't give a crap about gravity. This is the flat earth thread. The earth has been explored , mapped etc .

So without gravity how did they go around it.

 

[Boston tiger]

So without gravity how did they go around it.

Not interested in the physics of how it's possible to go around the earth just interested that is possible. It's been proven to be a sphere through human physical endeavour. You need a new thread.

 

[darthbards]

Can you point me to the 'sides'?

Stop playing semantics and look at the thing,you can't live on it without being on outrageously differing angles,including upside down. Go grab a ball and do the toy soldier experiment and stop diverting.
You have no interest in humanity which is why you constantly put roadblocks in front of those that do,while never following through or devoting yourself to your own endeavours. Your like a reporter that reports on others while not understanding anything outside your own brainwashed mind,a negative knocker...do the toy soldier experiment? Use something smaller if you have to,or go out and get a big blow up ball. We can't live on a ball,simple.

 

[Boston tiger]

Can you point me to the 'sides'?

Photoshopped by Jesuits?

 

[JackOutback]

Stop playing semantics and look at the thing,you can't live on it without being on outrageously differing angles,including upside down. Go grab a ball and do the toy soldier experiment and stop diverting.
You have no interest in humanity which is why you constantly put roadblocks in front of those that do,while never following through or devoting yourself to your own endeavours. Your like a reporter that reports on others while not understanding anything outside your own brainwashed mind,a negative knocker...do the toy soldier experiment? Use something smaller if you have to,or go out and get a big blow up ball. We can't live on a ball,simple.

You said you can clearly see the sides on the moon and the sun, asking you to point them out is hardly playing semantics. And if it turns out I posted the pic on a 90 degree angle and what you thought was the sides was actually the top or the bottom, what does that say about your view of the sphere?

 

[darthbards]

You said you can clearly see the sides on the moon and the sun, asking you to point them out is hardly playing semantics. And if it turns out I posted the pic on a 90 degree angle and what you thought was the sides was actually the top or the bottom, what does that say about your view of the sphere?

The whole thing is sides,go do the scientific experiment,we can't live on a ball. Flip it around all you want but someone has to be upside down and multiple people have to be on outrageous angles.

 

[NEGAN]

Not interested in the physics of how it's possible to go around the earth just interested that is possible. It's been proven to be a sphere through human physical endeavour. You need a new thread.

So what they did is not possible on a flat map?

 

[darthbards]

Photoshopped by Jesuits?

What does photoshop have to do with it? It's proof we can't live on a ball,a majik sphere,whatever you want to call it. Yes your religion photoshops and lies,it can't even get its own stories straight.
At the FES we agree the moon exists,we just differ on its size and location compared to the theory presented by the religion of fraudulent and institutionalised science.

 

[Wallaby]

Gravity is not a theory - gravity is a law.

A law in science is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon. Things are attracted to other things based on their masses and distance apart. This happens.

Where you are getting confused is with how this happens. People put forward hypotheses (guesses) as to how it may occur and then perform experiments to test whether the hypothesis stands up to repeated experiments under differing conditions.

For instance, you may have a hypothesis that states 'Everything falls down because there are magical Pixies pulling everything down'. Fine. Test that. Prove it.
A scientific theory is the explanation of the findings from testing the Hypotheses (sometimes several hypotheses contribute to a theory). And theories are constantly being refined as more and more information is discovered.

The current best theory for how gravity works is General Relativity.

So - gravity is a law. It happens. What is your hypothesis to explain gravity?

 

[exe ex machina]

Gravity is not a theory - gravity is a law.

A law in science is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon. Things are attracted to other things based on their masses and distance apart. This happens.

Where you are getting confused is with how this happens. People put forward hypotheses (guesses) as to how it may occur and then perform experiments to test whether the hypothesis stands up to repeated experiments under differing conditions.

For instance, you may have a hypothesis that states 'Everything falls down because there are magical Pixies pulling everything down'. Fine. Test that. Prove it.
A scientific theory is the explanation of the findings from testing the Hypotheses (sometimes several hypotheses contribute to a theory). And theories are constantly being refined as more and more information is discovered.

The current best theory for how gravity works is General Relativity.

So - gravity is a law. It happens. What is your hypothesis to explain gravity?

How does gravity hold trillions of tons of ocean down yet smoke and many other light things can rise without a problem? How can you raise your arms and legs so easily and not feel this force making it hard for you to raise an armor leg?

 

[NEGAN]

Gravity is not a theory - gravity is a law.

A law in science is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon. Things are attracted to other things based on their masses and distance apart. This happens.

Where you are getting confused is with how this happens. People put forward hypotheses (guesses) as to how it may occur and then perform experiments to test whether the hypothesis stands up to repeated experiments under differing conditions.

For instance, you may have a hypothesis that states 'Everything falls down because there are magical Pixies pulling everything down'. Fine. Test that. Prove it.
A scientific theory is the explanation of the findings from testing the Hypotheses (sometimes several hypotheses contribute to a theory). And theories are constantly being refined as more and more information is discovered.

The current best theory for how gravity works is General Relativity.

So - gravity is a law. It happens. What is your hypothesis to explain gravity?

What came first mass or gravity?

 

[Wallaby]

Gravity is a function of mass. So they must have come into being at the same time.

So what is your explanation of why gravity occurs?

 

[Boston tiger]

What does photoshop have to do with it? It's proof we can't live on a ball,a majik sphere,whatever you want to call it. Yes your religion photoshops and lies,it can't even get its own stories straight.
At the FES we agree the moon exists,we just differ on its size and location compared to the theory presented by the religion of fraudulent and institutionalised science.

But we do live on a ball. Your too late .. man has done it. Not theorised .. actually been around it. We invented boats and flying machines.

 

[darthbards]

Gravity is not a theory - gravity is a law.

A law in science is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon. Things are attracted to other things based on their masses and distance apart. This happens.

Where you are getting confused is with how this happens. People put forward hypotheses (guesses) as to how it may occur and then perform experiments to test whether the hypothesis stands up to repeated experiments under differing conditions.

For instance, you may have a hypothesis that states 'Everything falls down because there are magical Pixies pulling everything down'. Fine. Test that. Prove it.
A scientific theory is the explanation of the findings from testing the Hypotheses (sometimes several hypotheses contribute to a theory). And theories are constantly being refined as more and more information is discovered.

The current best theory for how gravity works is General Relativity.

So - gravity is a law. It happens. What is your hypothesis to explain gravity?

Lol,Gravity isn't a theory or a law,it's a phenomenon according to your religion that makes the rules up as it fraudulently goes along.

If it wasn't made up we wouldn't have Twittergate,the deliberate and fraudulent planting of gravity,the $600mil a year fraud carried out in the rightful home of the FES. How dare you put forward such ideologies on our FE thread.
You are aware there is a board for your fraudulent ideologies? Heavily policed and very well gatekept. You'll fit in a treat.
Another one so brainwashed as to not even understand your own religion...your a long way from home Gravity boy.

The current best theory isn't a law...that's why at the FES I'm working on the stars only existing under observation and trying to unite GR with QFT. At the FES we are working tirelessly while you put forward your roadblocks.

A law???...what a joke....even your own religious nutters should call you out but they won't.
BF..The Winnie Blues of science yet again.

 

[darthbards]

But we do live on a ball. Your too late .. man has done it. Not theorised .. actually been around it. We invented boats and flying machines.

You can go around the flat earth. It's a circular disk. Your religion is so obsessed with balls it has no idea anymore what a circle is.
Your religion makes stuff up,that's why you are frauds.

 

[Wallaby]

Gravity is the law that explains the phenomenon that things fall down. What is your theory as to why things fall down?

 

[exe ex machina]

Gravity is the law that explains the phenomenon that things fall down. What is your theory as to why things fall down?

Buoyancy and density