Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

was what i typed technically correct yes or no
No. The earth isnt moving away from anything faster than the speed of light.
A distance between two objects could be increasing faster than the speed of light.
But the earth isnt moving away from anything stationary faster than the speed of light.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

give me a moment to reading your boring crappy posts and i will reply dont stress

come on bro
You edited my quote to make me look like I wanted you to reply faster and now your using that to play the man instead of the ball.
You created a man to play, because you couldnt even play the man. while you were so milting at avoiding playing the ball.
 
No. The earth isnt moving away from anything faster than the speed of light.

A distance between two objects could be increasing faster than the speed of light.

But the earth isnt moving away from anything stationary faster than the speed of light.

gRk1uZm.gif


You edited my quote to make me look like I wanted you to reply faster and now your using that to play the man instead of the ball.
You created a man to play, because you couldnt even play the man. while you were so milting at avoiding playing the ball.

i didnt edit it, i looked several times and could not see it but remember seeing it previously

press the report button if your upset
 
if, A distance between two objects could be increasing faster than the speed of light, say the galaxy earth is located in, and another

has earth not moved away from galaxy 'B' , faster than the speed of light?

another English form of writing 'moved away from' is the word : moved

No. The earth isnt moving away from anything faster than the speed of light.
A distance between two objects could be increasing faster than the speed of light.
But the earth isnt moving away from anything stationary faster than the speed of light.

what in the universe is stationary?

why have you bought that word into it

are you 100% confident in your claims ?
 
gRk1uZm.gif




i didnt edit it, i looked several times and could not see it but remember seeing it previously

press the report button if your upset
Wait, you asked me if what you said was technically correct (I said no and explained why) just so you could post a meme? Dont you feel shame?

Here is what I posted.
Ive explained this to you already. How your understanding (like the pear shape thing) is warped and wrong.
Here is your post where you reply but edit my post and admit in the post that youve edited it.
delete 3.jpg

Seriously. How can you post
i didnt edit it
with a serious face?
 
what in the universe is stationary?

why have you bought that word into it

are you 100% confident in your claims ?
I am.
So you understand that nothing is actually moving faster than the speed of light?
 

i feel no shame for asking question in regards to things moving faster than the speed of light. Not all topics am i great at and i like to improve

So you understand that nothing is actually moving faster than the speed of light?

how bout tachyons

Wait, face?

i left a note saying its a summary not a quote, and i followed up on your first major cry i couldn't locate the exact post
drink a cup of concrete
 
i feel no shame for asking question in regards to things moving faster than the speed of light. Not all topics am i great at and i like to improve
Yeah but if you ask a question you need to at least pause and consider the answer. Ive literally answered your question before as have others. And you still repeat the same line of bullshit.


how bout tachyons
How about them?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

faster than light
You mean they are a name given to a theory of some thing that could travel faster than the speed of light.
You know there is no compelling evidence for there existence. You did know that?
 
Yeah but if you ask a question you need to at least pause and consider the answer. Ive literally answered your question before as have others. And you still repeat the same line of bullshit.



have you answered or if you are being pedantic with language? furthermore there is nothing to really answer, its a claim by scientists

are you quite sure if the distance between two objects, say the galaxy the earth is in and another, is increasing faster than the speed of light.

that does not 'mean' - that earth has moved away from the secondary galaxy faster ttsol
 
if, A distance between two objects could be increasing faster than the speed of light, say the galaxy earth is located in, and another

has earth not moved away from galaxy 'B' , faster than the speed of light?
No it hasnt because it hasnt moved faster than the speed of light.

And if you are trying to pretend you dont understand the semantics of language, why would you say
eat shit Einstein
?
 
in the same way there is no evidence the earth is a globe?
Do you not know what evidence is? Tachyon vs earth not being flat isnt even in the same hemisphere of conversation.
 
No it hasnt because it hasnt moved faster than the speed of light.

And if you are trying to pretend you dont understand the semantics of language, why would you say

?

well it has

its moved away from point b faster ttsol

in english, another way of saying moved away from is the word 'moved'
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

have you answered or if you are being pedantic with language? furthermore there is nothing to really answer, its a claim by scientists

are you quite sure if the distance between two objects, say the galaxy the earth is in and another, is increasing faster than the speed of light.

that does not 'mean' - that earth has moved away from the secondary galaxy faster ttsol
So if two objects total velocity is greater than the speed of light, that doesnt mean something is moving faster than the speed of light. You agree?
 
So if two objects total velocity is greater than the speed of light, that doesnt mean something is moving faster than the speed of light. You agree?

i care not for your hypothetical mumbojumbo i deal with facts son

if you do the automobile example again i will cry
 
i care not for your hypothetical mumbojumbo i deal with facts son

if you do the automobile example again i will cry
You are saying that two things moving apart must mean that one of them is traveling faster than the speed of light. Im just trying to explain that it doesnt mean that at all, it just means that the total sum of both their volocities could be greater than the speed of light, but it doesnt mean either is traveling faster than the speed of light.

No hypothetical. Just something you dont understand.
You cant pretend your talking about moving apart being the same as traveling at. Without admitting your wrong or your trolling.
But this is your forum and i accept your post.
 
how bout tachyons
Excellent point,some will suggest there is no compelling evidence for tachyons,yet this is just nit picking words. In the religion of science levels of evidence are important. In the real world people are,as they should be,interested in facts and proof.
There is also no proof for the existence of gravity,despite its constant references here on this thread,just as there is no proof for dark matter or dark energy. There is also no proof regarding the Big Bang,which could currently be described as a fairytale if one chose to.
We also have no proof of a creator,although there is some evidence,yet the religion of science are more than happy to claim this as a fairytale. They are more than happy to write up their own sets of rules to suit their own circumstances and agenda.
Kudos for raising an excellent point regarding the tachyon. :thumbsu:
 
Excellent point,some will suggest there is no compelling evidence for tachyons,yet this is just nit picking words. In the religion of science levels of evidence are important. In the real world people are,as they should be,interested in facts and proof.
There is also no proof for the existence of gravity,despite its constant references here on this thread,just as there is no proof for dark matter or dark energy. There is also no proof regarding the Big Bang,which could currently be described as a fairytale if one chose to.
We also have no proof of a creator,although there is some evidence,yet the religion of science are more than happy to claim this as a fairytale. They are more than happy to write up their own sets of rules to suit their own circumstances and agenda.
Kudos for raising an excellent point regarding the tachyon. :thumbsu:

There is a lot of evidence for 'gravity.'

What do you suggest the alternative is?
 
There is a lot of evidence for 'gravity.'

What do you suggest the alternative is?
I know there is evidence,I acknowledge that,what proof do you have that gravity exists? Is gravity fact? I could supply evidence that I'm magic,but this is not yet fact,so I cannot lay claim to being magic.
I have already suggested other alternatives.

1.That there is a seperate force mimicking what we believe is magik Gravity.
2.That there is a force caused by a repulsion from a nearby world or parallel universe.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom