-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.
- Thread starter katana
- Start date
- Tagged users None
This whole thread is full of why's
- Jun 3, 2014
- 2,297
- 1,368
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- 76ers
supposedly theres a wall of ice which makes it impossible to sail off of.
Ahh, it makes sense now...
- Banned
- #106
Because FLAT EARTH, OK????
has this mother*er heard of the southern hemisphere? different part of the sky, different stars which humans arbitrarily draw lines between.
Flight paths are the best evidence to disprove this theory.
Most flight paths are across the front of the earth, which at first glance supports the theory. However, the US to Japan flight path goes around the back of the globe. Thus disproving this theory once and for all.
You can all go home now.
Most flight paths are across the front of the earth, which at first glance supports the theory. However, the US to Japan flight path goes around the back of the globe. Thus disproving this theory once and for all.
You can all go home now.
- Thread starter
- #110
you just posted a flat picture. how is that a proof of a globe? why don't they cut the corner across antarctica?
How do you explain the Japan to us flight path then?
So the earth resembles a toilet roll?
So the earth resembles a toilet roll?
Ha. I can't believe it took so long for someone to post a picture of what it's meant to look like.
However, who says it's round? Outrageous. Everyone knows it's square. Any notion of circles or spheres is shear heresy 
Last edited:
No wonder discal warming is a concern then.supposedly theres a wall of ice which makes it impossible to sail off of.
- Mar 13, 2006
- 4,053
- 3,987
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Orlando Magic
Anyone else ever read through a thread and felt dumber afterwards?
plenty of times. What's worse is getting sucked into click bait "list" pages, and even worse is getting sucked into reading the comments on them
- Jul 10, 2012
- 3,155
- 1,932
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Banned
- #116
After that, its obvious that reading any more of any document would be a complete waste of time. What complete garbage.
Just been introduced to this recently and even before you look at the "facts" for and against. You really need to look at the scope it would take to keep this conspiracy alive if there was truth to it.
In order for this Mason/NASA thing to hold weight you would need most if not all compliance from the Space Agencies form around the World, not just NASA as well as who knows how many employees from every Commercial Airline Company on the Planet. The seer numbers alone should basically debunk this myth.
In order for this Mason/NASA thing to hold weight you would need most if not all compliance from the Space Agencies form around the World, not just NASA as well as who knows how many employees from every Commercial Airline Company on the Planet. The seer numbers alone should basically debunk this myth.
Same for moon landing/JFK/911/Anything.
What's more likely:
a) Minimum hundreds, more so tens of thousands required to strategise, execute and cover up the elaborate plan and no one ever spills the beans
b) the conspiracy theorist may be wrong
Unfortunately conspiracy theorists choose B, as they refuse to admit they are wrong or make bullshit statements such as 'I'm happy to be proven wrong when I see evidence that I am wrong' and then refute all evidence.
- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,387
- 19,521
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
JFK/911, very funny. That must be why they locked up the JFK stuff and it won't be released until 2025 or thereabouts. What is there to hide? Fast forward to 2025 and they won't tell us the truth!
Exhibit A.
- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,387
- 19,521
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Why have they locked up the CIA evidence? I wonder why Kevin Costner received death threats for starring in the movie "JFK".
On those and as a disclaimer not saying I believe it but it's interesting to discuss possibilities.
- The original Moon Landing could have very well been fake; considering the USA did want to get their first before the USSR. Keeping the lie (if there was one) hidden all this time, well that's not so easy.
- JFK, same as Moon landing. Easy to achieve, hard to keep secret.
- As for 9/11, still want the see the probability numbers that a commercial plane can hit a building in the right spot and make it implode. Then have it done by a bloke with minimal air training in only a light aircraft, twice in the one morning before I talk the why and how. As the other three very difficult (even more so given the scope of it) to keep under wraps.
Why do people assume something like JFK/911 would involve hundreds of people? Just imagine if you were planning something like this yourself - how many people would you involve and how would you ensure things will remain secret?
I'd imagine covert ops of a large scale would be compartmentalised, so the lower level grunts wouldn't even know the full scope of what they were doing. It's really only the higher ups, or people directly involved, who'd know.
This is a red-herring, disinformation, limited hang-out operation designed to mislead well-intentioned people who actually pose legitimate questions about major world events, like 9/11 or JFK.
Obviously the only real purpose it serves is to weed out the morons who do not actually look at verifiable facts. A little like the "no-planes on 9/11" disinformation. Nonetheless, it seems to work to provide mass-ridicule of anyone who dares to question things.
Obviously the only real purpose it serves is to weed out the morons who do not actually look at verifiable facts. A little like the "no-planes on 9/11" disinformation. Nonetheless, it seems to work to provide mass-ridicule of anyone who dares to question things.
Last edited:
- Banned
- #125
I really don't get how this is even still a thing. I get how people can believe in whatever religion or spirits or even parallel universes bit this is just *ed. Nek minnit someone will be claiming we are flying around on the back of elephants standing on a giant turtle
