Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

no proof world a globe, no proof evolution, no proof alien seeding

no proof earths moving - 2017 and you would of thought you'd done that one by now

i can see a pattern emerging

three-stages-of-truth1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
NEGAN,you keep thinking,you keep discussing and you keep learning via your heart,you will come to the right conclusion or the conclusions that best suit you.
Don't be bullied or growled at by these science folk. Yes it is all hard,yes it is complicated but they don't know the answers. No proof for the big bang,no proof for gravity,no proof for dark matter. They have no right to tell anyone they don't understand something or its to complicated until they themselves can provide proof.
I believe the simulation theory,mainly because I think it makes sense,I also think there is evidence all around us. People can waffle on all day about something else but until there is proof why should I believe them. They've been waffling on about the big bang created out of nothing my entire life yet can't prove it and then have the audacity to criticise people who may believe in creation.
Science is no less susceptible to brain washing as anything else.
I don't get phased by insults at all.

It's a conspiracy forum and people come here expecting a discussion on whether grass is green and water is wet.

Anything outside normal parameters is a cardinal sin.
 
I don't get phased by insults at all.

It's a conspiracy forum and people come here expecting a discussion on whether grass is green and water is wet.
Wasn't saying you do get phased,it actual fact I can see you don't.
Just wanted to pop my two bobs worth in to remind you some science people do look outside the square and there is nothing wrong with it.
Especially when you consider some of these science books they have out there. Pages missing everywhere,they even sometimes ask you to refer to one of the blank pages when discussing a seperate theory.
How do I know there's Gravity? Because of Dark energy.
Nice theory that one so far.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

no proof world a globe, no proof evolution, no proof alien seeding

no proof earths moving - 2017 and you would of thought you'd done that one by now

i can see a pattern emerging

three-stages-of-truth1.jpeg
It's so easy being a conspiracy theorist, no wonder there is a growing trend towards it. All you need to do is post random videos that vaguely discuss the topic (generally with a complete and utter lack of understanding of the actual topic at hand), post random pictures that either have no relevance to what you're talking about or a grossly taken out of context and then when people either question the conspiracy theory or they present you with facts and evidence that the conspiracy theory is bullshit, you just simply ignore it and claim that no one has provided you proof that it is wrong.

That's all you ever do.
 
It's so easy being a conspiracy theorist, no wonder there is a growing trend towards it. All you need to do is post random videos that vaguely discuss the topic (generally with a complete and utter lack of understanding of the actual topic at hand), post random pictures that either have no relevance to what you're talking about or a grossly taken out of context and then when people either question the conspiracy theory or they present you with facts and evidence that the conspiracy theory is bullshit, you just simply ignore it and claim that no one has provided you proof that it is wrong.

That's all you ever do.

look at #jarred's less-than-kinder-garden standard of 'debunking' of the six hour , youtube video of the OP thats been presented numerous times with the futuristic children on the cover

its so easy being a debunker, all you gotta do is talk a bit of crap, say troll and moron ad nauseam and not debunk much at all
 
look at #jarred's less-than-kinder-garden standard of 'debunking' of the six hour , youtube video of the OP thats been presented numerous times with the futuristic children on the cover

its so easy being a debunker, all you gotta do is talk a bit of crap

How about answering my questions?

How about responding to Judd2Sewell's link that explains perfectly why a flat Earth could not exist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
How about answering my questions?

How about responding to Judd2Sewell's link that explains perfectly why a flat Earth could not exist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it possible the earth is flat and being simulated as round and therefore flat?
 
Is it possible the earth is flat and being simulated as round and therefore flat?

It is also possible that I, Lo-Pan, am in fact god and the god of science and I derive my powers from my magnificent wisdom-beard. The whole galaxy itself is contained within my wisdom-beard and all of the stars and planets are mere crumbs within said magnificent beard.

Can you prove me wrong?
 
Is it possible the earth is flat and being simulated as round and therefore flat?

That kind of research is really in its infancy and you've jumped on it as if it is true. I'm not getting in to a debate about it because this is about debunking the lunacy of people thinking the Earth is flat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

That kind of research is really in its infancy and you've jumped on it as if it is true. I'm not getting in to a debate about it because this is about debunking the lunacy of people thinking the Earth is flat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not jumping on anything nor did I say it was true,I've only suggested it as a theory. If the world is flat inside a simulation it would then be lunacy to suggest it is round. It would only be simulated as round.
Why are some people so obsessed with debunking? Is it that they are fearful of the truth? Instead of trying to debunk someone else's theory,maybe the followers of the religion of science should concentrate a little harder on trying to prove their own.
 
I'm not jumping on anything nor did I say it was true,I've only suggested it as a theory. If the world is flat inside a simulation it would then be lunacy to suggest it is round. It would only be simulated as round.
Why are some people so obsessed with debunking? Is it that they are fearful of the truth? Instead of trying to debunk someone else's theory,maybe the followers of the religion of science should concentrate a little harder on trying to prove their own.

It's more than just a suggestion when you keep bringing it up at every opportunity. Perhaps try and create that debate in the simulation thread rather than this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It is also possible that I, Lo-Pan, am in fact god and the god of science and I derive my powers from my magnificent wisdom-beard. The whole galaxy itself is contained within my wisdom-beard and all of the stars and planets are mere crumbs within said magnificent beard.

Can you prove me wrong?
Would you call troll if someone outside your religion of science offered such a theory?
 
It's more than just a suggestion when you keep bringing it up at every opportunity. Perhaps try and create that debate in the simulation thread rather than this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But your crowd are the ones stating the earth is round as fact. Your crowd are even calling people names who suggest otherwise.
I think there is a 25-30% chance the earth is in fact round.
Multiple people in this thread have suggested the earth is round because they have seen it by looking out a aeroplane window. I dispute this as solid evidence. I suggested the human eye is not the greatest and most powerful thing in existence and was called a moron. Others have suggested a planes window is itself curved,I believe this to be correct.
 
I'm not jumping on anything nor did I say it was true,I've only suggested it as a theory. If the world is flat inside a simulation it would then be lunacy to suggest it is round. It would only be simulated as round.
Why are some people so obsessed with debunking? Is it that they are fearful of the truth? Instead of trying to debunk someone else's theory,maybe the followers of the religion of science should concentrate a little harder on trying to prove their own.
Its not a theory, its hypothesis. You cannot possibly demonstrate that its a simulation, its a hypothesis alongside million other hypotheses around. Basing your entire argument on a hypothesis is pseudo scientific and something tells me that you just here to troll.
 
I suggested the human eye is not the greatest and most powerful thing in existence and was called a moron.
Link to that?
Evidence of that?
Where did exactly that actually happen? Who was the poster?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Its not a theory, its hypothesis. You cannot possibly demonstrate that its a simulation, its a hypothesis alongside million other hypotheses around. Basing your entire argument on a hypothesis is pseudo scientific and something tells me that you just here to troll.
Hypothesis,theories,I'm not here to argue the religion of sciences differentials between words.
People are theorising that the earth is not in fact round.
We cannot prove it is round if we cannot even prove how it was created.
It is the round earth believers using every term they can muster - moron,nutter,madman,troll amongst others to suggest it is round,these terms are not evidence against alternate theories.
You cannot demonstrate it isn't a simulation,so therefore the possibility of it being flat in such an instance has not been disproven.
 
Hypothesis,theories,I'm not here to argue the religion of sciences differentials between words.
People are theorising that the earth is not in fact round.
We cannot prove it is round if we cannot even prove how it was created.
It is the round earth believers using every term they can muster - moron,nutter,madman,troll amongst others to suggest it is round,these terms are not evidence against alternate theories.
You cannot demonstrate it isn't a simulation,so therefore the possibility of it being flat in such an instance has not been disproven.

You cannot demonstrate there are no unicorns flying around in the universe and a unicorn created the solar system. Its a dumb argument sorry. Basing an entire argument on one possibility out of a million, its naive, very naive. You cannot demostrate the fact that unicorn didnt create the world, if you can, go ahead.

We can prove its round, you just wont accept the evidence that is accepted by vast majority of the people in the world, science, religious people alike.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom