Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[Watchyourwaite]

unique
&
wonderful

Here we are. I made a completely factual post. The proof in my post cant be denied.
So instead lies are being made up about me as the facts are ignored.

 

[cannot]

Why is it that there are so few of you who believe this rubbish?

source?

refusing to provide evidence yourself

did you read much of this thread?

, so no I won't waste my time engaging in discussion with you

convenient

worships a YouTube crackpots views.

as opposed to a witch doctor science communicator ? that doesnt publish much science yet rather is a mouth piece for the former heavily nazi nasa?

or blokes that made up their own maths, when they couldnt make the theory of gravity work under maths proper? newton, albert ...

 

[Total Power]

Here we are. I made a completely factual post. The proof in my post cant be denied.
So instead lies are being made up about me as the facts are ignored.

Put these 2 dullards under block, one is an idiot, the other is a troll. Just see the sheer number of idiotic posts and made up definitions these 2 have made. I called one of them out on a made up outright bs definition of religion to suit his argument. Not worth it, save your time.

 

[cannot]

Put these 2 dullards under block, one is an idiot, the other is a troll. Just see the sheer number of idiotic posts and made up definitions these 2 have made. I called one of them out on a made up outright bs definition of religion to suit his argument. Not worth it, save your time.

• a particular system of faith and worship.
  plural noun: religions
  "the world's great religions"
• a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion.
  "consumerism is the new religion"

tell me again about Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Quantum Strings and Ego

 

[katana]

What you're alluding to with your statement is that you don't care about the scientific method. The best answer we have right now is that gravity attracts objects to one another. This underpins everything from atomic nuclei to the planets and stars. There is no model better than gravity to explain these things.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

scientific method? i don't think someone arguing for mainstream cosmology ought to bring up the scientific method. tell me how does one manipulate independent variables in testing this 'gravity'?

 

[darthbards]

What does that even mean? Are we accelerating or not? Is the universe infinite or not?
According to bleh bleh. Do you have any thoughts of your own? Or are you a mindless drone that cant handle information?
So us not floating away isnt a force. How do scales work?
Do you even know what force is?


Again why are you replying for the flat earth society, instead of replying for yourself? Independent though is to difficult for you?


Gravity doesnt exist? ok fine. There is a force that makes objects accelerate towards the flat earth at 9.81 m/s/s.
How does that happen yet we are still able to see each other, and hear each other?
You hate facts.


What simple photos? What does this have to do with my factual post that youve just replied to and shrugged off?


I dont believe the earth is a ball. Ive explained this to you multiple times. How can you pretend to know me and my views while also pretending to not know my constant stance?

You have shrugged off an completely factual post, change the topic to photos, and made fun of me for being religious.

I called it!

I've shrugged nothing off,you have called nothing apart from your own ego and arrogance. In fact,you have ran away by again failing to provide factual proof of the existence of gravity or supplying photos of a ball shaped earth,while I answered your diversion question. You are also being pedantic in what shape you believe the earth is as further diversion.

UA is a specific body of matter that effects only what's directly on top of it,it's quite simple really,and it answered the question you asked. Anything not resting on the UA is not affected by it. It only effects FE.

If ball earthers are going to be the ones hurling the abuse,name calling and insults,they need to provide some facts to back up there claims regarding the abusive nature of their comments,and provide proof they themselves are not also an example of the words/names they are hurling around.

 

[darthbards]

Put these 2 dullards under block, one is an idiot, the other is a troll. Just see the sheer number of idiotic posts and made up definitions these 2 have made. I called one of them out on a made up outright bs definition of religion to suit his argument. Not worth it, save your time.

So you want us blocked now because the round earthers can't provide factual proof for gravity nor supply unedited photos of the round earth or supply video of the whole earth spinning?
Again,if your going to go with the name calling,state your factual proof in your religious belief in the religion of sciences belief in the earth being round.
If you want to sook it up all 'tradional' sciency may I remind you there is an actual science board within this very website.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

Put these 2 dullards under block, one is an idiot, the other is a troll. Just see the sheer number of idiotic posts and made up definitions these 2 have made. I called one of them out on a made up outright bs definition of religion to suit his argument. Not worth it, save your time.

Amazing that they post on the science board and pretend they are looking for meaningful discussion.

Do you think its strange that right after cannot was warned to stop making bs threads on the science board, that suddenly darthtard started making bs threads instead?

 

[Total Power]

Amazing that they post on the science board and pretend they are looking for meaningful discussion.

Do you think its strange that right after cannot was warned to stop making bs threads on the science board, that suddenly darthtard started making bs threads instead?

Cannot is not darthtard (i think), cannot is simply a moron. Every single post of his makes me cringe, literally.

Darthtard is just here to troll, even after posting evidences, he has 2 strategies A. Either discard the evidences given without counter-argument or B. Ignore your post completely and continue repeating the same shit over and over again and asking the same dumb questions over and over again.

You made a great post in the last page with maths, but that was totally ignored, instead they dullards went on asking the same questions and posting the same shit.

This bloke is just here to troll, i have put him under block and life is much better. Him and the Procrastinator should form their own board about conspiracy and posting stupid stuff and insulting religion and science and above all intellect.

 

[darthbards]

Where all still waiting for the masterminds to provide factual proof for the existence of gravity,dark matter and dark energy.
We are also waiting for these simple photographs and some video footage.

I also can't see why the earth can't be flat and two or three dimensional,when a black hole can be flat and two dimensional when this also was felt not to be the case.

 

[cannot]

Cannot is not darthtard (i think), cannot is simply a moron. Every single post of his makes me cringe, literally.

Darthtard is just here to troll, even after posting evidences, he has 2 strategies A. Either discard the evidences given without counter-argument or B. Ignore your post completely and continue repeating the same shit over and over again and asking the same dumb questions over and over again.

You made a great post in the last page with maths, but that was totally ignored, instead they dullards went on asking the same questions and posting the same shit.

This bloke is just here to troll, i have put him under block and life is much better. Him and the Procrastinator should form their own board about conspiracy and posting stupid stuff and insulting religion and science and above all intellect.

"troll"

"moron"

what a surprise

Do you think its strange that right after cannot was warned to stop making bs threads on the science board, that suddenly darthtard started making bs threads instead?

yay... at least we got a new one dingbat theory as opposed to the normal abusive dribble

what a conspiratorial mind you have

 

[cannot]

scientific method? i don't think someone arguing for mainstream cosmology ought to bring up the scientific method. tell me how does one manipulate independent variables in testing this 'gravity'?

dont forget the fishy, maths too...

newton the alchemist nutter and albert ze bomb maker just made shit up to make it work

like infinitesimals, anti gravity... bit like how current science communicators that dont publish much science seemingly make things up in 'twitter wars'; the magik theory of gravity

 

[darthbards]

Ah the new age of the Twitter wars.
Interesting argument could be had for how some science institutions are using social media to make fraudulent statements to stay relevant to keep their government funding.
Some religions will always find a way to take money from their believers or find new ways to keep their hands in the till.

 

[CJApples87]

you should go over the discussion as a whole and post a rankings table:

a) proof the earth a chubby pear
b) proof the earths flat

itd be good seeing your findings

The issue with you is, you've been told several times about the 'pear-shaping' of the Earth and what that actually means. You then just ignore it for a couple of days and go back to bringing it up as a point.

It doesn't matter what is said to you, you just ignore it and then go back to the same thing later on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[cannot]

The issue with you is, you've been told several times about the 'pear-shaping' of the Earth and what that actually means. You then just ignore it for a couple of days and go back to bringing it up as a point.

It doesn't matter what is said to you, you just ignore it and then go back to the same thing later on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

im not ignoring it whatsoever ?

are you not comfortable with that terminology ?

 

[CJApples87]

im not ignoring it whatsoever ?

are you not comfortable with that terminology ?

I am more than comfortable with it. It's been explained to you. You bring it up as if it's ridiculous. You're the one who has the issue.

It is ever-so-slightly pear-shaped in that below the equator is around one kilometre greater in circumference then above the equator. I distance so small (when compared to the size of the Earth) that it is effectively undetectable.

This is such a non-issue yet you keep bringing it up as if it's a problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[cannot]

I am more than comfortable with it. It's been explained to you. You bring it up as if it's ridiculous. You're the one who has the issue.

It is ever-so-slightly pear-shaped in that below the equator is around one kilometre greater in circumference then above the equator. I distance so small (when compared to the size of the Earth) that it is effectively undetectable.

This is such a non-issue yet you keep bringing it up as if it's a problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yeah... im pretty sure i fully understand the science communicator was trying to convey, in regards to his comment/s

i will now start saying "chubby" or "ever-so-slightly pear-shaped" if you would prefer

what a strange thing to take take umbrage to

i didnt claim it was an issue,

you should go over the discussion as a whole and post a rankings table:

a) proof the earth an Oblate Spheroid
b) proof the earths flat

itd be good seeing your findings

 

[CJApples87]

yeah... im pretty sure i fully understand the science communicator was trying to convey, in regards to his comment/s

i will now start saying "chubby" or "ever-so-slightly pear-shaped" if you would prefer

what a strange thing to take take umbrage to

i didnt claim it was an issue - you are uptight, like a randy nun i am happy to rephrase for the sake of you panties and knots:

you should go over the discussion as a whole and post a rankings table:

a) proof the earth an Oblate Spheroid
b) proof the earths flat

itd be good seeing your findings

Again, for the fourth time I will link you to this page for you to have a look through. You were asked to do this maybe two weeks ago and three times subsequently.

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-t...14-ways-the-flat-earth-theory-is-false.t7148/

If, once again, you choose to ignore this, it will become clear that you have been brainwashed by random YouTubers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Reppie]

If the earth was really flat (it isn't) why would they feel the need to keep it from us?
If it was flat the same people would probably be running with they're hiding the truth from us, the earth is a sphere shape.
Absolutely nothing to be gained by not telling the truth about the shape of the earth.

The truth about the flat earth isn't being hidden from anyone.
All ancient cultures believed in the earth being flat.
I's all about denying that there being a creator and hence trying to delude people with this big bang pseudoscience garbage.
That being said people are free to believe whatever they like.

 

[cannot]

mods - i apologize it that crossed over to the realm of 'personal insults'

 

[cannot]

Again, for the fourth time I will link you to this page for you to have a look through. You were asked to do this maybe two weeks ago and three times subsequently.

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-t...14-ways-the-flat-earth-theory-is-false.t7148/

If, once again, you choose to ignore this, it will become clear that you have been brainwashed by random YouTubers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

respectfully, that is a somewhat lazy approach

http://www.vorply.com/world/list/co...t-being-round-which-will-scramble-your-brain/

im not ignoring it, ive read many flat earth debunking things, so of them more convincing that others

alarmingly a few of the flight paths stuff is some of the better ive seen... which is concerning as i was anticipating a mountain of evidence the earths is a slightly pear like globe as has been indoctrinated

 

[CJApples87]

respectfully, that is a somewhat lazy approach

http://www.vorply.com/world/list/co...t-being-round-which-will-scramble-your-brain/

im not ignoring it, ive read many flat earth debunking things, so of them more convincing that others

alarming a few of the flight paths stuff is some of the better ive seen

So you're not going to respond to the points made in that link? That's called ignoring it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[darthbards]

Metabunk lol,that's just shill central.

 

[cannot]

Metabunk lol,that's just shill central.

its sposed to be better than snopes however

So you're not going to respond to the points made in that link? That's called ignoring it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i will, scouts honour

i dont know much FE theory outside of skimming some memes , a few searches and the like however i acquired a book which i will read after i finish dune again and attempt to help you with all questions

 

[CJApples87]

respectfully, that is a somewhat lazy approach

http://www.vorply.com/world/list/co...t-being-round-which-will-scramble-your-brain/

im not ignoring it, ive read many flat earth debunking things, so of them more convincing that others

alarmingly a few of the flight paths stuff is some of the better ive seen... which is concerning as i was anticipating a mountain of evidence the earths is a slightly pear like globe as has been indoctrinated

Most of these points do not take in to account gravity and inertia. Perhaps link me to something that provides actual explanations of these issues and how they work on a flat Earth rather than just a couple of lines from someone who has no idea what they're talking about.

I'm happy to go through them when I'm home and on my laptop.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk