Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[darthbards]

whats up with gravity?

Sounds like the religion of science has differing opinions,or can't get their story straight.
I consider this a tell tale sign something is up and would consider this evidence.

 

[darthbards]

No mate, you've got this the wrong way around. The accepted belief amongst society is that the Earth is round. This thread is about the Earth being flat. Therefore flat Earthers need to prove that it is flat or disprove that it is round rather than 'round Earthers' having to prove what is already the accepted norm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But the round earthers are the abusive ones,so the proof should be simple and take no time to produce at all.

 

[cannot]

Sounds like the religion of science has differing opinions,or can't get their story straight.
I consider this a tell tale sign something is up and would consider this evidence.

'science' agrees the theory of gravity if problematic

its only the fundamentalist globies on here that say otherwise. which is funny as its unscientific claim to make...

 

[Santoz]

Will discuss when the round earhers can provide factual proof for Gravity,an unedited photo of globe earth and footage of the WHOLE earth spinning as has been requested numerous times previously. Let's clear thiese unanswered questions up before delving any deeper with further quesrioning.
Your point one has already been addressed though.
By the way,congratulations on the upcoming birth of the newest addition to your family.

I found this image of Blue Marble 2015. I'm supposing this is no good? Why?

https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Blue-Marble-2015.png

 

[Chism]

Quit playing the man and attacking others personally.

Thread bans are next.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Exactly. Hence the world is clearly a(n imperfect) sphere.

Your bogus bullshit youtube videos and rubbish 'proof' that the earth is flat is a massive reach - a reach so far that you should be careful you do put out your shoulder.

 

[cannot]

Exactly.

errr... you think willys-razor 'the simplest solution tends to be the best'

would refer to the world is flat and motionless (as science cannot disprove, in 2017)

or we are
.... going @ 1000 mph around its central axis
- traveling 67000 mph , circles around the sun
- spiraling 500000 mph around the milky way
- while the galaxy goes 670000000 mph thur the univers

and moving away from other galaxies faster than the speed of light?

simple
ˈsɪmp(ə)l/
adjective
superlative adjective: simplest

1. 1.
   easily understood or done; presenting no difficulty.
   "a simple solution"
   synonyms: straightforward, easy, uncomplicated, uninvolved, effortless, painless, manageable, undemanding, unexacting, elementary, child's play, plain sailing, a five-finger exercise, nothing; More
   • 
     
2. 2.
   plain, basic, or uncomplicated in form, nature, or design; without much decoration or ornamentation.
   "a simple white blouse"
   synonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated, unembellished, unornamented, without ornament/ornamentation, unelaborate, unpretentious, unostentatious, unfussy, no-nonsense, basic, modest, unsophisticated, penny plain, without frills, honest, homely, homespun, everyday, workaday; More

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Chism, the suppressor of truth! (jokes, don't ban me)

 

[cannot]

Chism, the suppressor of truth! (jokes, don't ban me)

hopefully no one is is banned as it would dilute the discussion

 

[cannot]

I found this image of Blue Marble 2015. I'm supposing this is no good? Why?

https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Blue-Marble-2015.png

i think my post was deleted? its no good

due to nasa themselves, mr goddard specifically, said its 'fake'. there is sources earlier in the thread

mods i am attempting to play them ball here

 

[NEGAN]

I found this image of Blue Marble 2015. I'm supposing this is no good? Why?

https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Blue-Marble-2015.png

Accepting something like that is like that is like accepting the teacher is always right as a student and the customer is always right as a salesman.

There was photos from NASA of the Earth pasted together dating back from 70''s to the present you could clearly see the bulls*** they forced you to swallow. Each picture had major differences from continent size and position. Water colours etc.

 

[Santoz]

Sounds like the religion of science has differing opinions,or can't get their story straight.
I consider this a tell tale sign something is up and would consider this evidence.

But Flat Earthers aren't consistent with their idea of firmament.

Some believe it's glass or crystalline.

Others believe it's like an ozone layer.

Will you accept that proponents of any theory have differing views locally, besides with the 'enemy'?

 

[Judd2Sewell]

errr... you think willys-razor 'the simplest solution tends to be the best'

would refer to the world is flat and motionless (as science cannot disprove, in 2017)

or we are
.... going @ 1000 mph around its central axis
- traveling 67000 mph , circles around the sun
- spiraling 500000 mph around the milky way
- while the galaxy goes 670000000 mph thur the univers

and moving away from other galaxies faster than the speed of light?

I believe that the most natural shape in existence is the sphere – it is the shape that can be the most dense and most compact of all shapes.

This is evidenced by the fact all of the planets, suns, black holes and stars that have been discovered are all of a spherical nature. The theory of gravity lends to these observations and is in fact evidenced by them.

This quite simple rational is enough for me to come to the realisation/understanding that the earth is a sphere. It simply makes the most sense.

I have looked with my own eyes through a telescope at the Moon, Mars and Saturn. I have seen the Sun (though that’s not a good idea) – all of which appear to be perfect circles/spheres upon observation. Now are you telling me that all of these things are just perfectly placed discs that are facing the earth at the perfect angle to suggest they are spheres, when in fact they are discs? Or are they all spheres and earth is just the odd-one-out?

If there is a worldwide conspiracy to suppress the truth that the earth is flat then there would need to be a valid, believable reason as to why such a body would want this information suppressed. As yet, there has been literally nothing offered to explain why anyone would wish to suppress this information, let alone a plausible, viable and believable reason.

I don’t need any further reasoning to straight-up deny your flat earth theory – as you and your kind are yet to offer anything reasonable to explain why this would be the case.

You offer no explanations. Your only attempt at explanations to support your theory are to throw questions at us like the one in this post I’ve quoted.

That’s simply not good enough.

 

[cannot]

But Flat Earthers aren't consistent with their idea of firmament.

Some believe it's glass or crystalline.

Others believe it's like an ozone layer.

Will you accept that proponents of any theory have differing views locally, besides with the 'enemy'?

how many 9/11 theories are there?

jfk?

not having a unified theory in regard to what material the firmament is, isn't a major issue i wouldn't have thought?

I believe that the most natural shape in existence is the sphere – it is the shape that can be the most dense and most compact.

This is evidenced by the fact all of the planets, suns, black holes and stars that have been discovered are all of a spherical nature. The theory of gravity lends to these observations and is in fact evidenced by them.

This quite simple rational is enough for me to come to the realisation/understanding that the earth is a sphere.

I have looked with my own eyes through a telescope at the Moon, Mars and Saturn. I have seen the Sun (though that’s not a good idea) – all of which appear to be perfect circles/spheres upon observation. Now are you telling me that all of these things are just perfectly placed discs that are facing the earth at the perfect angle to suggest they are spheres, when in fact they are discs? Or are they all spheres and earth is just the odd-one-out?

If there is a worldwide conspiracy to suppress the truth that the earth is flat then there would need to be a valid, believable reason as to why such a body would want this information suppressed. As yet, there has been literally nothing offered to explain why anyone would wish to suppress this information, let alone a plausible, viable and believable reason.

I don’t need any further reasoning to straight-up deny your flat earth theory – as you and your kind are yet to offer anything reasonable to explain why this would be the case.

You offer no explanations. Your only attempt at explanations to support your theory are to throw questions at us like the one in this post I’ve quoted.

That’s simply not good enough.

i hadn't finished yet;


That's a grand total of 670568000 mph in several different directions we're all supposedly speeding along...

without taking into account, the new theory that we are perhaps 'moving' away from other parts of the universe 'faster than the speed of light'

now does that really sound like the most simple solution to you?

or would a flat, motionless realm be more 'simple'

 

[NEGAN]

I said it before.

It's exactly why I can't accept a flat Earth theory.

You ask 3 different flat Earth enthusiast the same question you will get 3 different answers.

But I am still not closed to the discussion of it as they do have some solid questions about round earth that do require some thought.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

how many 9/11 theories are there?

jfk?

not having a unified theory in regard to what material the firmament is, isn't a major issue i wouldn't have thought?



i hadn't finished yet;


That's a grand total of 670568000 mph in several different directions we're all supposedly speeding along...

without taking into account, the new theory that we are perhaps 'moving' away from other parts of the universe 'faster than the speed of light'

now does that really sound like the most simple solution to you?

or would a flat, motionless realm be more 'simple'

Yes it most probably would be - which is exactly why the primitive peoples of thousands of years ago believed that this was the case.

Then people got smarter and worked the reality out.

Now we have evidence and discoveries that suggest - quite clearly - that the earth is a sphere (perfect or ever-so-slightly pear-shaped).

Suddenly the flat earth theory is no longer the 'simple one' beyond the derogatory meaning of the world simple. You work that one out.

 

[Santoz]

Sounds like the religion of science has differing opinions,or can't get their story straight.
I consider this a tell tale sign something is up and would consider this evidence.

how many 9/11 theories are there?

jfk?

not having a unified theory in regard to what material the firmament is, isn't a major issue i wouldn't have thought?

Well, apparently it's ok for some in certain circumstances.

 

[cannot]

Sounds like the religion of science has differing opinions,or can't get their story straight.

not having a unified theory in regard to what material the firmament is, isn't a major issue i wouldn't have thought?

Well, apparently it's ok for some in certain circumstances.

science its sposed to be held 'above' the conspiracy nutters, is it not?

i was of the assumption it were to be held to high standards

and here we find are self with the magik theory of gravity (evolution, alien seeding, modern space theories). more holes than swiss cheese

 

[cannot]

Yes it most probably would be - which is exactly why the primitive peoples of thousands of years ago believed that this was the case.

Then people got smarter and worked the reality out.

Now we have evidence and discoveries that suggest - quite clearly - that the earth is a sphere (perfect or ever-so-slightly pear-shaped).

Suddenly the flat earth theory is no longer the 'simple one' beyond the derogatory meaning of the world simple. You work that one out.

the definition of 'simple' did not change

going @ 670568000 mph , maybe more, heaps of different directions. Any yet not feeling any of it, nor being able to prove earths motion via science isnt simple at all ...

its a vastly complete which flys in the face of said razor

I said it before.

It's exactly why I can't accept a flat Earth theory.

You ask 3 different flat Earth enthusiast the same question you will get 3 different answers.

But I am still not closed to the discussion of it as they do have some solid questions about round earth that do require some thought.

yet its the same for string theory, gravity, various space theories

there being various 9/11 explanations, doesn't not mean that 9/11 went down exactly as the authorities insist it did.

 

[Santoz]

now does that really sound like the most simple solution to you?

or would a flat, motionless realm be more 'simple'

It's like the chances of life evolving on earth if you believe evolution.

In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion!

https://www.icr.org/article/493/237

What would the chances be that god created a flat earth? Less that 1 in a trillion, trillion, trillion, tri ...

I digress, though creationism does seem like a simple solution, I agree.

 

[darthbards]

But Flat Earthers aren't consistent with their idea of firmament.

Some believe it's glass or crystalline.

Others believe it's like an ozone layer.

Will you accept that proponents of any theory have differing views locally, besides with the 'enemy'?

I have already accepted this in a post replying to one of yours.
I'm of the belief humans aren't even a fraction as intelligent as some think we are.The fact the thread is 70 pages long and we are still waiting for factual proof for Gravity or even an unedited picture of earth or video of the whole earth spinning offers strong evidence to this observation. An intelligent being should easily be able to provide factual proof regarding the shape of its planet.
Theories on numerous topics throughout history have had numerous differings in opinion. Some of these theories are still yet to be proven,despite what we may be told to believe.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

the definition of 'simple' did not change

going @ 670568000 mph , maybe more, heaps of different directions. Any yet not feeling any of it, nor being able to prove earths motion via science isnt simple at all ...

its a vastly complete which flys in the face of said razor



yet its the same for string theory, gravity, various space theories

there being various 9/11 explanations, doesn't not mean that 9/11 went down exactly as the authorities insist it did .

Simple - as in easiest, most common or basic.

Simple - as is not too intelligent.

I used both definitions in my post, you can work out which one applied and where.

 

[darthbards]

I believe that the most natural shape in existence is the sphere – it is the shape that can be the most dense and most compact of all shapes.

This is evidenced by the fact all of the planets, suns, black holes and stars that have been discovered are all of a spherical nature. The theory of gravity lends to these observations and is in fact evidenced by them.

This quite simple rational is enough for me to come to the realisation/understanding that the earth is a sphere. It simply makes the most sense.

I have looked with my own eyes through a telescope at the Moon, Mars and Saturn. I have seen the Sun (though that’s not a good idea) – all of which appear to be perfect circles/spheres upon observation. Now are you telling me that all of these things are just perfectly placed discs that are facing the earth at the perfect angle to suggest they are spheres, when in fact they are discs? Or are they all spheres and earth is just the odd-one-out?

If there is a worldwide conspiracy to suppress the truth that the earth is flat then there would need to be a valid, believable reason as to why such a body would want this information suppressed. As yet, there has been literally nothing offered to explain why anyone would wish to suppress this information, let alone a plausible, viable and believable reason.

I don’t need any further reasoning to straight-up deny your flat earth theory – as you and your kind are yet to offer anything reasonable to explain why this would be the case.

You offer no explanations. Your only attempt at explanations to support your theory are to throw questions at us like the one in this post I’ve quoted.

That’s simply not good enough.

Umm...a fair bit of study being done that black holes are in fact flat. I posted something as such on this thread already.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Umm...a fair bit of study being done that black holes are in fact flat. I posted something as such on this thread already.

that's nice

 

[cannot]

Simple - as in easiest, most common or basic.

Simple - as is not too intelligent.

I used both definitions in my post, you can work out which one applied and where.

ah yes , the Orwellian manipulating the definition of words to suit my case