Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

there are many cases of planes making 'emergency landings' like such examples when a women has given birth prematurely - at places further away on the globe map than the original destination which is a closer distance

it would have only made sense for the pilot to go to that emergency landing location on a flat model ..
There was no emergency landings, it was a direct flight..are you saying the map of the world is wrong now? :drunk:
 
How-to-tell-if-youre-brainwashed-300x300.jpg


I agree that this conspiracy is one of the poorest ones around. .

You'd think so wouldn't you...

however this is reasonably compelling

its hard to think outside the freemason / jesuit parameters bestowed upon you since in nappies


 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

you make a fair point

it does indeed throw a spanner in the works
Dude have you been to Alaska? there is a flight you can take from alaska to russia. Its a 1 hour and few minutes flight and you will be in Russia. Travel the world and tell me how flat earth stacks up. How long will take it for you to reach russia from alaska in a flat world?
 
Dude have you been to Alaska? there is a flight you can take from alaska to russia. Its a 1 hour and few minutes flight and you will be in Russia. Travel the world and tell me how flat earth stacks up. How long will take it for you to reach russia from alaska in a flat world?

like i said, the things you've saved are problematic for the FE model

however there are counter arguments - why does a flight from perth to south africa refuel at dubai?
 
however there are counter arguments - why does a flight from perth to south africa refuel at dubai?

Come on mate, South African airways flies direct from PER to JNB. Middle eastern airlines will always stop in the middle east, there are no direct flights and its not profitable for them to do so. I am flying Zurich Seychelles next month, i have a stopover in the middle east. If you are flying Cathay pacific, you are stopping over in HK, if your flying thai, they will always stop in bangkok but if you are flying Air seychelles, theres a direct flight from paris to seychelles. Do some investigation on how airlines operate.
 
Fair enough. But is there a point to arguing with someone who doesn't actually know what they're even talking about, let alone what they are cut/pasting from a random blogger?

Might point before all of this, is that putting equal weighting on the oblate spheroid earth, and any other random thought bubble, is intellectually dishonest.

He kept seeming to insist that there is equal evidence. I pointed out that there isn't, and it's just that he either doesn't understand, or he is trolling.

He put up a few dot points and said they fit perfectly well with simulation. I asked him to explain how they fit. Not a huge leap in reasoning, surely?
He responded with a meaningless copy paste and told me to work out the rest.
I believe he is trolling. If not, I wouldn't bother discussing this issue with him. The flat earth theory is the worst conspiracy ever.
PS face palm coming up if by some miracle I am wrong.
 
Come on mate, South African airways flies direct from PER to JNB. Middle eastern airlines will always stop in the middle east, there are no direct flights and its not profitable for them to do so. I am flying Zurich Seychelles next month, i have a stopover in the middle east. If you are flying Cathay pacific, you are stopping over in HK, if your flying thai, they will always stop in bangkok but if you are flying Air seychelles, theres a direct flight from paris to seychelles. Do some investigation on how airlines operate.

seems like a pain in the ass connection, i am not well versed in flight paths however after some light research it does seem to be a large flaw in the FE model theory as ive now conceded three times.

i dont think that equates to absolute proof however overriding every FE argument backed by math and science in some examples -.-
 
Fair enough. But is there a point to arguing with someone who doesn't actually know what they're even talking about, let alone what they are cut/pasting from a random blogger?

Might point before all of this, is that putting equal weighting on the oblate spheroid earth, and any other random thought bubble, is intellectually dishonest.

He kept seeming to insist that there is equal evidence. I pointed out that there isn't, and it's just that he either doesn't understand, or he is trolling.

He put up a few dot points and said they fit perfectly well with simulation. I asked him to explain how they fit. Not a huge leap in reasoning, surely?
He responded with a meaningless copy paste and told me to work out the rest.
I'm not pointing out there is more evidence the world is simulated,I'm pointing out there is evidence.
I'm not saying the earth is not a spinning globe,orbiting a star in an ever expanding universe into nothing created from a Big Bang created from nothing,I'm saying there is not enough evidence,and some of it is rather shaky based on a fair few assumptions.
 
seems like a pain in the ass connection, i am not well versed in flight paths however after some light research it does seem to be a large flaw in the FE model theory as ive now conceded three times.

i dont think that equates to absolute proof however overriding every FE argument backed by math and science in some examples -.-

This is one of the many proofs, fly south african airways and you can be in South Africa in a little over 10 hours non stop! the fact that you can be in russia from N.America in an hour is proof enough that FE is nonsense
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I believe he is trolling. If not, I wouldn't bother discussing this issue with him. The flat earth theory is the worst conspiracy ever.
PS face palm coming up if by some miracle I am wrong.
Are you saying it's a conspiracy in the model put forward in the op or it's a conspiracy suggesting it's flat inside a simulation?
 
1. We are in a simulation.
2. We perceive the Earth to be spherical.
3. Jesuits.
4. ??
5. The Earth is flat.
 
like i said, the things you've saved are problematic for the FE model

however there are counter arguments - why does a flight from perth to south africa refuel at dubai?

That is superb. I've decided that you're just posting to make us laugh now, because that one made me laugh [emoji846].


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

**** me, if someone asks a question as to why Middle eastern airlines fly to their home-base first before flying anywhere else, i am literally speechless. :drunk:
He doesn't even understand that we can sense acceleration, not velocity. Trying to explain Newtons first law would be an exercise in futility.
 
1. We are in a simulation.
2. We perceive the Earth to be spherical.
3. Jesuits.
4. ??
5. The Earth is flat.

*profit*

**** me, if someone asks a question as to why Middle eastern airlines fly to their home-base first before flying anywhere else, i am literally speechless. :drunk:

when i got to sychelles i dont want to go to bloody dubai, then again upon further reflection i do not choose arab planes

its not like south africa is much further on your fancy globe map
 
Last edited:
there is the 6 hour video about five posts above containing numerous

why not debunk it by copying and pasting snoopes or one of your favorite subreddits
Your co conspirator was the one copy pasting from reddit.

So you don't have a single example that you can articulate? Just a youtube video that you don't understand?
 
Your co conspirator was the one copy pasting from reddit.

So you don't have a single example that you can articulate? Just a youtube video that you don't understand?

i understand it i think, im even going to read the book just to shit you... do you really want me to type it out ? i feel it may infringe on some sort of copy right
infringement

much of the video, is based on another book i think '200 proofs the earth is flat', i think

debunk that with and every will press 'like'. do it for science

then debunk the simulation theory too pls - you were sposed to do that days ago remember!
 
i understand it, im even going to read the book just to shit you

do you really want me to type it out ?

i feel it may infringe on some sort of copy right infringment

much of the video is based on another book i think '200 proofs the earth is flat', i think

debunk that with and every will press 'like'
Are you writing in code? Maybe there is an error in your programming, because that was just a word salad.

Where have I complained about copy right infringement?

Just give an example that is backed by science and math, as you claimed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom