Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[darthbards]

You said you have "evidence". I called you out on that, your statement doesnt fit the criteria of evidence. Make a deductive claim is not evidence. Prove alien seeding is wrong, prove pink unicorn is wrong, heck prove god wrong, prove we are not here by accident, etc etc. You cannot do any or all, you cannot disprove me. So asking me to disprove a certain "claim" is a strawman and your argument is based on strawman, not evidence. I called you out on that, dont blame me, your argument boils down to the same claim as religious fundies "god did it" or "sims did it" in your case. Sorry that is not very intellligent, you got nothing in the end, but thats ok but dont bring this rubbish outside of the conspiracy board

I'm not claiming my evidence is fact and I'm not interested in providing evidence for any of the other things you suggested. You cannot prove your evidence as fact either. You wanted evidence I supplied it. If that evidence doesn't meet your religious standards,to bad.
I do not have to follow your religious standard,I'm open minded not religious.
Your the one calling troll,prove my evidence impossible?
Prove your evidence as fact?

 

[CJApples87]

Where are they coming from then?

Most are remnants left over from the formation of planets and moons and other bodies at the start of the solar system. Some have orbits around the sun that wander through our own orbit, others have been knocked in to the orbit via collisions with other asteroids/meteoroids mostly in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Did you skip school?

 

[Reppie]

Most are remnants left over from the formation of planets and moons and other bodies at the start of the solar system. Some have orbits around the sun that wander through our own orbit, others have been knocked in to the orbit via collisions with other asteroids/meteoroids mostly in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Did you skip school?

So your trying to tell me that the earth is speeding through space at 66000 miles an hour and a meteor can travel at right angles and impact the earth at 90 degree right angles?
And yes i did skip school for a good reason.
I wait for you explanation.

 

[CJApples87]

They sun and moon are no where are far away as we are told.
So they act as a spotlight in an area.
And just dissappear out of sight when they move out of sight.
Seeing how you dont have time to watch the video why bother posting?
You must have better things to do obviously.

And just disappear out of sight when they move out of sight. Brilliant. I live on the west coast and regularly observe the sun going below the horizon out over the ocean (it's a magical sight, you should view it). If your flat earth theory was correct, I was just witness it getting smaller and smaller but not going near the horizon.

I doubt you bothered to watch it either because the first five minutes is about a tortoise and a hare. But maybe you decided to be brainwashed by people with a lack of understanding of basic physics.

 

[Total Power]

I'm not claiming my evidence is fact and I'm not interested in providing evidence for any of the other things you suggested. You cannot prove your evidence as fact either. You wanted evidence I supplied it. If that evidence doesn't meet your religious standards,to bad.
I do not have to follow your religious standard,I'm open minded not religious.
Your the one calling troll,prove my evidence impossible?
Prove your evidence as fact?

Evidence by defintion has be a "certain fact" that must fit your claim. Your simulation hypothesis does not fit that claim so dont say its evidence. You made a series of claims and unable to back your claims up and then claim 'my religious standards'.I dont think you are that dumb. I cannot prove that earth is not a simulation just like you cant prove earth is one, hence neither of have any evidence, how hard is it for a person to understand? i dont care what you believe in, but dont claim you have "evidence", its just being dishonest, specially to yourself

 

[Reppie]

And just disappear out of sight when they move out of sight. Brilliant. I live on the west coast and regularly observe the sun going below the horizon out over the ocean (it's a magical sight, you should view it). If your flat earth theory was correct, I was just witness it getting smaller and smaller but not going near the horizon.

I doubt you bothered to watch it either because the first five minutes is about a tortoise and a hare. But maybe you decided to be brainwashed by people with a lack of understanding of basic physics.

Being an expert on physics answer my last post.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Sad you would need to ask that question if you had done any research into the topic.

My apologies for not taking the time to 'research' into this ludicrous topic. I would have thought the self-evident fact the planet is a sphere would be enough m

If I wanted to deliberately destory my brain cells I would have just smoked another joint, or maybe hit my head against the wall a few dozen times. Both of which would be more educational than researching into this topic.

Make a believer out of me though and tell me all the juicy details.

 

[CJApples87]

So your trying to tell me that the earth is speeding through space at 66000 miles an hour and a meteor can travel at right angles and impact the earth at 90 degree right angles?
And yes i did skip school for a good reason.
I wait for you explanation.

At the speed that they travel through the atmosphere, if they haven't blown up (generally those on a more acute angle), they create an enormous impact at the point they impact the Earth. They don't burn a hole through the earth before blowing up, it's instant. This site explains it better than I can.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-are-impact-craters-al/

 

[Reppie]

At the speed that they travel through the atmosphere, if they haven't blown up (generally those on a more acute angle), they create an enormous impact at the point they impact the Earth. They don't burn a hole through the earth before blowing up, it's instant. This site explains it better than I can.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-are-impact-craters-al/

Pure comedy.
See what mainstream education does for you.

 

[CJApples87]

Pure comedy.
See what mainstream education does for you.

Yep, the Scientific American is pure comedy. There is no point debating this with you because you refuse to believe the explanations being provided to you by people who actually research the topic, rather than people who just post YouTube videos to get money from suckers.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

No one is yet to explain what the end-game is.

It's all well and good to bleat on and bang your pans over this nonsense, but why would anyone foster this huge conspiracy?

Is it supposedly tied into the simulation conspiracy?

What's meant to be on the other side of the coin? What is beyond the Ice Wall? Do any of you tinfoil-hat-wearing folks have answers?

 

[CJApples87]

No one is yet to explain what the end-game is.

It's all well and good to bleat on and bang your pans over this nonsense, but why would anyone foster this huge conspiracy?

Is it supposedly tied into the simulation conspiracy?

What's meant to be on the other side of the coin? What is beyond the Ice Wall? Do any of you tinfoil-hat-wearing folks have answers?

Cannot posted in another thread that there are more lands that we are never allowed to know about outside the ice wall.

That of course is in direct contradiction to previous posts he's made, but you know, that doesn't matter.

 

[Reppie]

Yep, the Scientific American is pure comedy. There is no point debating this with you because you refuse to believe the explanations being provided to you by people who actually research the topic, rather than people who just post YouTube videos to get money from suckers.

Back to school for you young fella.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Cannot posted in another thread that there are more lands that we are never allowed to know about outside the ice wall.

That of course is in direct contradiction to previous posts he's made, but you know, that doesn't matter.

Hahaha, and what would we find on those phantom lands?

 

[CJApples87]

Back to school for you young fella.

Back to YouTube videos of people with no scientific background for you 'young fella'.

The sun disappears, pure comedy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CJApples87]

Hahaha, and what would we find on those phantom lands?

The lizard people, duh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Watchyourwaite]

The earth is a donut and its part of a Nintendo 64 game.

I know this because I dont understand basic physics.

Also science is a religion.

Also you cant prove this wrong so that must mean it holds as much legitimacy as any evidence provided by jesuit religious science fart.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Back to YouTube videos of people with no scientific background for you 'young fella'.

The sun disappears, pure comedy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I sometimes think we are just suckers being completely trolled by these loonies because I just can't fathom people truly being this deluded.

 

[cannot]

Cannot posted in another thread that there are more lands that we are never allowed to know about outside the ice wall.

That of course is in direct contradiction to previous posts he's made, but you know, that doesn't matter.

of course

but is it?

 

[darthbards]

Evidence by defintion has be a "certain fact" that must fit your claim. Your simulation hypothesis does not fit that claim so dont say its evidence. You made a series of claims and unable to back your claims up and then claim 'my religious standards'.I dont think you are that dumb. I cannot prove that earth is not a simulation just like you cant prove earth is one, hence neither of have any evidence, how hard is it for a person to understand? i dont care what you believe in, but dont claim you have "evidence", its just being dishonest, specially to yourself

Are you trying to go round in circles to prove earth is a ball.
Prove as fact your evidence. If you cannot prove your evidence as fact you are being dishonest to yourself based on the brainwashing by the religion of science.
If my evidence is so poor,prove it impossible.
I do think there is a 25-30% chance the earth is round based on the religion of sciences current evidence.

 

[CJApples87]

of course

but is it?

Yes it is. Originally you had posted an Earth that was horizontal. Then you posted an Earth with a clear end just outside the ice wall. Now it's got more landmass outside it.

Throwing shit against a wall and hoping it sticks. Have you gone through that link yet?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Reppie]

of course

but is it?

Careful CJ's has a TV education.

 

[cannot]

Yes it is. Originally you had posted an Earth that was horizontal. Then you posted an Earth with a clear end just outside the ice wall. Now it's got more landmass outside it.

Throwing shit against a wall and hoping it sticks. Have you gone through that link yet?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yeah i also posted these one previously

there being different maps isn't a contradiction, its just different maps

this is a contradiction:

dont when you hate it when you forget to make continents roughly the same size on fake space photos?

 

[CJApples87]

And just disappear out of sight when they move out of sight. Brilliant. I live on the west coast and regularly observe the sun going below the horizon out over the ocean (it's a magical sight, you should view it). If your flat earth theory was correct, I was just witness it getting smaller and smaller but not going near the horizon.

I doubt you bothered to watch it either because the first five minutes is about a tortoise and a hare. But maybe you decided to be brainwashed by people with a lack of understanding of basic physics.

Careful CJ's has a TV education.

Any danger of responding to the above or are you going to do the cannot trick of just ignoring it because it contradicts your bizarre theory?

 

[Total Power]

Are you trying to go round in circles to prove earth is a ball.
Prove as fact your evidence. If you cannot prove your evidence as fact you are being dishonest to yourself based on the brainwashing by the religion of science.
If my evidence is so poor,prove it impossible.
I do think there is a 25-30% chance the earth is round based on the religion of sciences current evidence.

I keep repeating the same thing and you keep asking the same question, "prove its impossible". Either you are thick or you are trolling. I cannot prove earth is not a simulation just like you cant prove earth is one. Neither of us have any evidence, thats what i am saying to you. Just like you cant prove/disprove god hypothesis. Absence of evidence is not proof of something it simply means "we dont know". You seem to assume that makes an evidence but it doesnt. You sound more and more like a religious fundamentalist the same way they claim 'god did it'. That is no evidence, that is a claim!

While there is a chance everything is a simulation, there is also a chance that everything is not, there is also a chance that aliens created us or we are here by accident, there is no evidence either way to make such statements.

**** me