Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[cannot]

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/80

00/8108/ipcc_bluemarble_west_lrg.jpg

The Official Fake* Portrait of Home.. (eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov)

* rendering/composite image of Earth

 

[NEGAN]

.


It shows the curvature of the earth. Have you ever been in a plane at 30-40,000 feet up? On a clear day you can see the curvature of the earth from your window as well.

Just to make clear I'm not attacking your beliefs, nor mocking them. Just pointing things out.

Nah no offence taken mate.

Just saying if that's the best out there oooh boy.

Btw I am not a flat Earther.

 

[cannot]

Nah no offence taken mate.

Just saying if that's the best out there oooh boy.

Btw I am not a flat Earther.

 

[cannot]

Come on man,

You know that's not good enough and/or really what I asked for.

 

[NEGAN]

Man that is not going to convince me.

If the world was flat as this picture depicts I will be able to stand on my balcony see for much further than I can.

I would be able to see ships much much further than that picture shows.

Topography, shaping of land mass, sea levels from one position to another, let alone the difference in perception that a camera can make.

You would have pilots singing to the hills about this, amateur pilots would start forums like we are now.

If you ever doubt how far your eyesight travels, just look up.

Don't hogwash me about atmospheric conditions as it can't cloud your sight 24 hrs a day all around the world at all times and if the atmospheric conditions effect how far I can see I look up and I see the stars even with light pollution.

 

[cannot]

Man that is not going to convince me.

If the world was flat as this picture depicts I will be able to stand on my balcony see for much further than I can.

I would be able to see ships much much further than that picture shows.

Topography, shaping of land mass, sea levels from one position to another, let alone the difference in perception that a camera can make.

You would have pilots singing to the hills about this, amateur pilots would start forums like we are now.

If you ever doubt how far your eyesight travels, just look up.

Don't hogwash me about atmospheric conditions as it can't cloud your sight 24 hrs a day all around the world at all times and if the atmospheric conditions effect how far I can see I look up and I see the stars even with light pollution.

it the earth were flat,

how far do you think your magic robot eyes could see?

 

[darthbards]

Man that is not going to convince me.

If the world was flat as this picture depicts I will be able to stand on my balcony see for much further than I can.

I would be able to see ships much much further than that picture shows.

Topography, shaping of land mass, sea levels from one position to another, let alone the difference in perception that a camera can make.

You would have pilots singing to the hills about this, amateur pilots would start forums like we are now.

If you ever doubt how far your eyesight travels, just look up.

Don't hogwash me about atmospheric conditions as it can't cloud your sight 24 hrs a day all around the world at all times and if the atmospheric conditions effect how far I can see I look up and I see the stars even with light pollution.

i think you might be missing the part about how light bends which is what causes the ship on the horizon to seem to disappear. The earths Upward Acceleration also play a part in being able to see across as opposed to up.
It's all perfectly explained on their website.

 

[darthbards]

it the earth were flat,

how far do you think your magic robot eyes could see?

The fact we have invented telescopes is pretty good evidence our eyes aren't a great as people are making out unfortunately.

 

[NEGAN]

it the earth were flat,

how far do you think your magic robot eyes could see?

2.6 million light years away.

 

[NEGAN]

i think you might be missing the part about how light bends which is what causes the ship on the horizon to seem to disappear. The earths Upward Acceleration also play a part in being able to see across as opposed to up.
It's all perfectly explained on their website.

it the earth were flat,

how far do you think your magic robot eyes could see?

My point in picture form.

 

[darthbards]

My point in picture form.

View attachment 329090

View attachment 329091

It's all explained in the book 'Zetetic Astronomy,Earth is not a globe'
The relevant parts are contained in Chapter 14.

 

[katana]

Man that is not going to convince me.

If the world was flat as this picture depicts I will be able to stand on my balcony see for much further than I can.

I would be able to see ships much much further than that picture shows.

Topography, shaping of land mass, sea levels from one position to another, let alone the difference in perception that a camera can make.

You would have pilots singing to the hills about this, amateur pilots would start forums like we are now.

If you ever doubt how far your eyesight travels, just look up.

Don't hogwash me about atmospheric conditions as it can't cloud your sight 24 hrs a day all around the world at all times and if the atmospheric conditions effect how far I can see I look up and I see the stars even with light pollution.

what is a gyroscope? how does it work?

 

[katana]

My point in picture form.

View attachment 329090

View attachment 329091

this is beyond ******ed.

surely you feel embarassed to imagine grown adults take this as a serious argument for a giant spinning ball with black holes and anti-matter hurtling through infinite space?

 

[Heisenberg_]

this is beyond ******ed.

surely you feel embarassed to imagine grown adults take this as a serious argument for a giant spinning ball with black holes and anti-matter hurtling through infinite space?

The hypocrisy in this post is staggering.

 

[darth_timon]

I didn't prove a thing,just supplied evidence. Your religion should stop polluting with your inconsistent beliefs in what is evidence and what isn't,based on your religion of science ideologies.

The religion of science is happy dismiss some evidence because it can't be proven,while on the other hand accept other evidence that cannot be proven.
Dark matter is an excellent example in this case.
Flat earth theorists dismisses Einstein as a fraud,while harsh in my view this theory in this regard is worthwhile of consideration.

Flat earthers believe Gravity doesn't exist. They believe in Upward Acceleration. A simple way for your religion to dismiss the flat earth theory would be to prove your religions belief in Gravity true.

Gravity is a vital component of how stars form and are powered. It is a theory which fits the facts. Occam's Razor applies.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

 

[darthbards]

The hypocrisy in this post is staggering.

I've noticed you have made a number of short,sharp contributions to this thread while at the same time being able to contribute next to nothing. Maybe you would actually care to show proof for some of the questions that have been actually raised here,that remarkably remain unanswered?
- Proof for the existence of gravity that would dispel the theory of upward acceleration (UA)
- A simple unedited picture of he earth being shown as a globe.
- Unedited vision of the earth spinning

I understand you like to keep your contributions short and meaningless,so the answer to one of these questions will be sufficient and a good starting point.

 

[darthbards]

Gravity is a vital component of how stars form and are powered. It is a theory which fits the facts. Occam's Razor applies.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

Not interested in what the simplest answer is here,or what fits the facts,I care for fact without the fitting excuses. I'm not a member of WADA so the evidence needs to be stronger than just strings and cables.
Can you please supply proof,as fact,that Gravity does in fact exist?

 

[darth_timon]

Not interested in what the simplest answer is here,or what fits the facts,I care for fact without the fitting excuses. I'm not a member of WADA so the evidence needs to be stronger than just strings and cables.
Can you please supply proof,as fact,that Gravity does in fact exist?

What you're alluding to with your statement is that you don't care about the scientific method. The best answer we have right now is that gravity attracts objects to one another. This underpins everything from atomic nuclei to the planets and stars. There is no model better than gravity to explain these things.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

 

[darthbards]

What you're alluding to with your statement is that you don't care about the scientific method. The best answer we have right now is that gravity attracts objects to one another. This underpins everything from atomic nuclei to the planets and stars. There is no model better than gravity to explain these things.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

What I'm alluding to here is I don't 'care' for science being treated in a religious form,meaning I don't 'care' for religious terminology such as Oscamms Razor or pseudo science,terminology that has been used numerous times throughout this thread.
I never asked for the best answer we have right now.I asked for proof,as fact,that Gravity exists. This has yet to be supplied.
Another poster has asked for an unedited photo of the earth as a globe while going to the trouble of showing numerous edited versions,but is as yet to have his request met.
Another poster would like to see some unedited footage of the globe earth spinning. A request that has again not been supplied.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Too many loonies, not enough koolaid

 

[Watchyourwaite]

NEGAN your getting abused by flat earthers and anti flat eathers. But your the only one in this thread who isnt pushing an agenda, and using it for what its actually about.

Sorry buddy. Hope it gets better and you get some proper discussion. (not from me, i think the flat earth idea is contemptible).

 

[NEGAN]

NEGAN your getting abused by flat earthers and anti flat eathers. But your the only one in this thread who isnt pushing an agenda, and using it for what its actually about.

Sorry buddy. Hope it gets better and you get some proper discussion. (not from me, i think the flat earth idea is contemptible).

If flat earth v globe earth were a sport I would be the referee.

I just ask questions that I want answers for seems to push buttons though.

Especially that Katana person, I could actually feel the anger in his post.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Negan I think you may have been the answer this whole time....

What shape was Glenn's head before and then after his run-in with Negan? I think we finally have the answer.

 

[darthbards]

Too many loonies, not enough koolaid

There are three requests currently on the table. I'd suggest by page 60 we should meet these requests rather than the name calling and accusations that have been trotted out as a replacement for facts,or as an excuse for the inability to answer numerous questions asked throughout this thread. Rather than a self indulgent appraisal of your own worth or intelligence can you supply,
- Proof,as fact,the existence of gravity therefore eliminating the flat earth theory of Upward Acceleration (AU)
- an unedited photo of the earth in its rumoured globe state.
- footage of the globe earth spinning. The whole earth,not a disk that actually looks a little like the Flat Earth model as we sore from the ISS using multiple cameras,rather than just the same single camera.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

Upward Acceleration (AU)

Curiouser and curiouser.

Also how old could the earth be? How long have we been accelerating at 9.81m/s/s?