Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You're missing the point, even the most off the rails stoners I know would scoff at a flat earth theory for being batshit crazy.
Your missing mine. Drug use/abuse is irrelevant to this thread and should be discussed in the relevant thread.
 
I'm not in love with Gravity nor to I have a religious belief in it. I find your request would be better undertaken by someone who does,although still uneccassary.

That's all well and good, but you should really jump out of a building if you wish to prove Gravity is false.
 
- I sort of don't believe in a 'separate force' that mimics gravity. I'd just call it gravity as it makes better sense to me.
- Separate worlds and parallel universes is way above my IQ level.
- Universal Acceleration is hard to accept as I don't know how a flat earth could sustain acceleration unless the bottom of the earth uses all of the volcanic energy pent up in the earth like a big rocket exhaust to keep accelerating us. The glass shield can be like a giant windshield to keep the space bugs out and us earthers little rocketeers.

Can I get a quick summary of how you think the sun might move around the firmament (above or in) so that I can get to the point with my question regarding it. Cheers.
Firstly,thanks for your reply regarding my conclusions form the 'dropping things' experiment. If you would wish to call a seperate force mimicking gravity gravity ,I guess that's ok,but it would be confusing,not that we couldnt just quickly adjust to gravities new meaning,but it's hardly the same thing.

As the sun rotates around the earth it is moving in a slightly northerly direction. When it reaches its northern extremity it starts to head back in a southerly direction until it reaches its southern extremity,where it then begins to again head northward.
Please note,like the round earth,Gravity and Big Bang,this is all just theory,there is no factual proof.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

As the sun rotates around the earth it is moving in a slightly northerly direction. When it reaches its northern extremity it starts to head back in a southerly direction until it reaches its southern extremity,where it then begins to again head northward.
Please note,like the round earth,Gravity and Big Bang,this is all just theory,there is no factual proof.

Cool. I think you misunderstood what I meant about where the sun actually sits in the grand scheme of things.

Do you believe it's above, below, or inside the firmament?
 
That's all well and good, but you should really jump out of a building if you wish to prove Gravity is false.
Sounds like you have no issues with someone dieing because they do not follow your religion of science or adhere to your religious viewpoint?.....Charming.
 
And to get this thread back to what it actually should be, the Flat Earth believers proving that the Earth is flat and disproving that it is round (which consistently gets ignored) I will ask the following questions that I require answers to:

1. How actually does a sunset go below the horizon and a sunrise come from beyond the horizon? I witnessed this occur last evening while watching my beautiful wife during her pregnancy photo shoot (and took photos myself) and I witness it on regular occasions. But how, ahem, on Earth does that happen if the Sun is supposed to just zoom off in to the distance? My eyes most certainly didn't deceive me and the Sun most certainly did not get much smaller and smaller in size like it's 'supposed' to.

2. How do Lunar Eclipses occur? All of a sudden the Moon goes behind the flat Earth accidentally I guess. Something like that.

3. If the Moon was so close, how come different parts of the world see the same side of the moon? If it's only 3000 miles away then surely people who are beyond the other side of the moon would see that other side, but they don't.

4. If the Earth is flat, then how can we accurately predict exactly where the ISS was, where the ISS is and where the ISS will be (channelling Bret 'The Hitman' Hart for a moment) when those predictions are entirely based upon a round Earth model? You can do this too and prove it yourself. When you see that the ISS is tracking near you, you can look out for it.

5. Just how many people would need to be in on the conspiracy? It would be an utterly extraordinary amount of people that would need to know the Earth is flat but that we need to ensure the rest of the public don't find out. Why haven't the space agencies of other countries come out and shocked the world by informing us that what we have been taught is wrong? The Chinese would love to do something like that, I'm sure. How about pilots, meteorologists, scientists, physicists, etc., etc. coming out and spilling the beans? Why is my brother-in-law (a previously qualified pilot) lying to me, my sister, my family, his kids, his friends all of these years? Why would he do that?

And also for the, I don't know maybe 6th time, how about the points in this link are questioned or at least attempted to be questioned by those that have been asked of them previously? https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-t...14-ways-the-flat-earth-theory-is-false.t7148/
 
Cool. I think you misunderstood what I meant about where the sun actually sits in the grand scheme of things.

Do you believe it's above, below, or inside the firmament?
Firstly,my beliefs are in facts. I believe we have very little facts regarding the true nature of the universe and it's the religion of sciences pushing of their theories on the mainstream public that has given it a wider and more general appeal. I believe all theories possible until we have factual proof. I have been limited to what theories of flat earth I can discuss and been told I must stick to the op. It does appear illegal drug use can be discussed though,with even the websites moderators partaking in such discussions.

I believe according to the the flat earth society theory the sun is inside the firmament.
 
But with no gravity surely you won't die?
But with something mimicking Gravity,or a repulsion from a parallel universe or universal acceleration I would.
It's not all about your religion of science and their philosophies and teachings.
It's not really that hard to understand I would have thought.
 
But with something mimicking Gravity,or a repulsion from a parallel universe or universal acceleration I would.
It's not all about your religion of science and their philosophies and teachings.
It's not really that hard to understand I would have thought.

I see, so you believe there may be something that could be mimicking what we perceive to be gravity. Interesting.

I shall pray at my altar of science and ask my great science god of scienceness for the answer.
 
I believe according to the the flat earth society theory the sun is inside the firmament.

Sorry, but then what is the firmament made up of? A glassy/crystalline material?
 
Not saying that at all.
My mind is open to all possibilities.
Show me proof of a ball earth and i'll change my stance.
Until then it's as flat as a shit carters hat.

If the earth is flat, can you google earth the location to the gates of Valhalla please. I am late for dinner with Odin and forgot the address.

Thank you
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Sorry, but then what is the firmament made up of? A glassy/crystalline material?
Sorry, but then what is the firmament made up of? A glassy/crystalline material?
I think you'll find there are differing flat earth theories as there have been throughout history on many topics.
The firmament is more in relation to the flat earth based around the bible.
For more information regarding this your your probably best off reading the Old Testament or directing your question to the Religion thread.
In relation to the atmolayer outlined in the flat earth in the op it consists of Tropolayer,Stratolayer,Mesolayer and Ionolayer
 
No one's explained why a supernatural creator would make the world in the form of a disk?
A globe Earth doesn't preclude the existence of a creator. A sphere is the most perfect 3D object.

Someone (darthbards?) suggested a disk Earth could be accelerating upward at 9.8m/s^2. Impossible, Earth's gravity has small variations all over the world. It's slightly lower near the equator due to the rotation and slightly higher near the poles.
 
No one's explained why a supernatural creator would make the world in the form of a disk?


Someone (darthbards?) suggested a disk Earth could be accelerating upward at 9.8m/s^2. Impossible, Earth's gravity has small variations all over the world. It's slightly lower near the equator due to the rotation and slightly higher near the poles.

Madonna called it - God is a DJ
 
I think you'll find there are differing flat earth theories as there have been throughout history on many topics.
The firmament is more in relation to the flat earth based around the bible.
For more information regarding this your your probably best off reading the Old Testament or directing your question to the Religion thread.
In relation to the atmolayer outlined in the flat earth in the op it consists of Tropolayer,Stratolayer,Mesolayer and Ionolayer

Ah ok.

So they're our ozone layer as such.
 
And to get this thread back to what it actually should be, the Flat Earth believers proving that the Earth is flat and disproving that it is round (which consistently gets ignored) I will ask the following questions that I require answers to:

1. How actually does a sunset go below the horizon and a sunrise come from beyond the horizon? I witnessed this occur last evening while watching my beautiful wife during her pregnancy photo shoot (and took photos myself) and I witness it on regular occasions. But how, ahem, on Earth does that happen if the Sun is supposed to just zoom off in to the distance? My eyes most certainly didn't deceive me and the Sun most certainly did not get much smaller and smaller in size like it's 'supposed' to.

2. How do Lunar Eclipses occur? All of a sudden the Moon goes behind the flat Earth accidentally I guess. Something like that.

3. If the Moon was so close, how come different parts of the world see the same side of the moon? If it's only 3000 miles away then surely people who are beyond the other side of the moon would see that other side, but they don't.

4. If the Earth is flat, then how can we accurately predict exactly where the ISS was, where the ISS is and where the ISS will be (channelling Bret 'The Hitman' Hart for a moment) when those predictions are entirely based upon a round Earth model? You can do this too and prove it yourself. When you see that the ISS is tracking near you, you can look out for it.

5. Just how many people would need to be in on the conspiracy? It would be an utterly extraordinary amount of people that would need to know the Earth is flat but that we need to ensure the rest of the public don't find out. Why haven't the space agencies of other countries come out and shocked the world by informing us that what we have been taught is wrong? The Chinese would love to do something like that, I'm sure. How about pilots, meteorologists, scientists, physicists, etc., etc. coming out and spilling the beans? Why is my brother-in-law (a previously qualified pilot) lying to me, my sister, my family, his kids, his friends all of these years? Why would he do that?

And also for the, I don't know maybe 6th time, how about the points in this link are questioned or at least attempted to be questioned by those that have been asked of them previously? https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-t...14-ways-the-flat-earth-theory-is-false.t7148/

Still waiting for these to be discussed. They're pretty big issues, to be honest. Any danger of a Flat Earth proponent answering these and/or going through the link?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

william-of-ockham-razor-quote.png
 
But with something mimicking Gravity,or a repulsion from a parallel universe or universal acceleration I would.
It's not all about your religion of science and their philosophies and teachings.
It's not really that hard to understand I would have thought.

In January 2010, Erik Verlinde, professor ofTheoretical Physics and world-renowned string theorist, caused a worldwide stir with the publication of On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton, ... going so far as to state ‘for me gravity doesn’t exist’.


whats up with gravity?
 
Last edited:
Still waiting for these to be discussed. They're pretty big issues, to be honest. Any danger of a Flat Earth proponent answering these and/or going through the link?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Will discuss when the round earhers can provide factual proof for Gravity,an unedited photo of globe earth and footage of the WHOLE earth spinning as has been requested numerous times previously. Let's clear thiese unanswered questions up before delving any deeper with further quesrioning.
Your point one has already been addressed though.
By the way,congratulations on the upcoming birth of the newest addition to your family.
 
Will discuss when the round earhers can provide factual proof for Gravity,an unedited photo of globe earth and footage of the WHOLE earth spinning as has been requested numerous times previously. Let's clear thiese unanswered questions up before delving any deeper with further quesrioning.
Your point one has already been addressed though.
By the way,congratulations on the upcoming birth of the newest addition to your family.

No mate, you've got this the wrong way around. The accepted belief amongst society is that the Earth is round. This thread is about the Earth being flat. Therefore flat Earthers need to prove that it is flat or disprove that it is round rather than 'round Earthers' having to prove what is already the accepted norm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Will discuss when the round earhers can provide factual proof for Gravity,an unedited photo of globe earth and footage of the WHOLE earth spinning as has been requested numerous times previously. Let's clear thiese unanswered questions up before delving any deeper with further quesrioning.
Your point one has already been addressed though.
By the way,congratulations on the upcoming birth of the newest addition to your family.

Thanks mate, baby number 1 [emoji846].

But the points haven't been addressed apart from "Metabunk, shill something or other". And the onus is on those who go against the grain of the accepted norm to prove it, not those who are in synch with the accepted norm having to continuously prove it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom