Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
maybe maybe not but they twinkle on videos with (v) good telescopes, and they are apparently not sposed to according to the brainstrust
cool huh
The sooner we do away with 'teachers' and use technology to educate students the better in my book.Thats a pretty disgusting thing to say to a teacher who has dedicated so much of his life to educating students.
whats the name for that?
atmospheric refraction again or another one
no doubt a good jesuit based name
Now we're finally seeing some credible evidence at the level that the Flat Earthers have been providing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
its been said several times, its some forms of FE theory, you cannot 'fall off' cause there is a wall of ice that goes around the disk
crap meme
I think what we are dealing with here is pure ignorance and the round ball brigade unable to accept they've been barking up the wrong tree with this round nonsense.its been said several times, its some forms of FE theory, you cannot 'fall off' cause there is a wall of ice that goes around the disk
crap meme
but you dont know what part of science do you?
Or we could keep our minds open to the very real possibility the earth,or even our universe may not be round after all.Hahahahahaha, so instead let's believe that the ignorant fools of yesteryear were right all along! Flat Earth is the troof!
This has been explained in the thread. It's also on their webpage and explained on some of the you tube clips posted by posters. There's also numerous diagrams throughout the thread.Ok, that wasn't the best example to use but, still, how would day/night work if the Earth was flat?
Why would someone even mention they are a teacher
'Teachers' have no right to impose their personal beliefs on the minds of our young.
Roylion you're wasting your time. No matter how much empirical evidence you provide, no matter how well thought-out your arguments are and no matter how sound your reasoning is (and no matter how many highly educated individuals corroborate it) you're just going to be accused of being "ignorant" and having your head buried in the sand.
I've said 25-30% chance round,sounds like your being a bit greedy and wanting more for the evidence provided.Roylion you're wasting your time. No matter how much empirical evidence you provide, no matter how well thought-out your arguments are and no matter how sound your reasoning is (and no matter how many highly educated individuals corroborate it) you're just going to be accused of being "ignorant" and having your head buried in the sand.
It's shameful someone would teach the current theories on offer only.
Which bit of
"What is taught in education relies on the prevailing scientific consensus from experts in science. Those are backed up by reputable, scientific empirical data, collected through the scientific method, by experts from those fields. When further discoveries are made and theories subsequently updated and agreed to by the consensus of scientists across a variety of scientific fields then the curriculum will subsequently be updated"
didn't you understand?
Which bit of
"What is taught in education relies on the prevailing scientific consensus from experts in science. Those are backed up by reputable, scientific empirical data, collected through the scientific method, by experts from those fields. When further discoveries are made and theories subsequently updated and agreed to by the consensus of scientists across a variety of scientific fields then the curriculum will subsequently be updated"
didn't you understand?