- Joined
- May 17, 2015
- Posts
- 4,951
- Reaction score
- 5,406
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Don't forget to mention the repulsion from a parallel world or universe theory.What relativity, SR, GR? can you answer my question? do you believe in gravity?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Don't forget to mention the repulsion from a parallel world or universe theory.What relativity, SR, GR? can you answer my question? do you believe in gravity?
I did, it doesnt answer the question. You and I had this discussion where you said gravity is a fact/law not just a theory.
You seem more reasonable than darthtard, so i expect a better answer.
Dont quote my post when you havent answer any of my questions. Repeating the same thing over and over again wont make it any true. Its true we dont know much about the universe, but among the thing we know round up is not up for discussion.Don't forget to mention the repulsion from a parallel world or universe theory.
Thank you, thats all i asked. So why dont you believe in GR? so Sattellites, GPS etc etc which are the result of TGR is a croc as well?I still hold to Newton's theory....where's the difficulty?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Thank you, thats all i asked. So why dont you believe in GR? so Sattellites, GPS etc etc which are the result of TGR is a croc as well?
The inherent contradictions between quantum theory & Newtonian mechanics has always roused my suspicions....I prefer the common-sense model to metaphysical postulations on the part of physicists.
Ill repeat whatever I want and I've been answering questions for the first about 80 pages and I'm a bit over it. The best evidence the round ballers have produced is the Red Bull dude,which was pretty poor and possibly a conspiracy itself.Dont quote my post when you havent answer any of my questions. Repeating the same thing over and over again wont make it any true. Its true we dont know much about the universe, but among the thing we know round up is not up for discussion.
Yes you can repeat whatever you want, sure, but you dont want to engage is a discussion, just parrot the same old stuff from pseudo scientific websites, without any evidence other than repeating "humans are not intelligent" and "we know 4%". Awesome evidence there. Just STFU you aint got shit to discuss other than the broken record.Ill repeat whatever I want and I've been answering questions for the first about 80 pages and I'm a bit over it. The best evidence the round ballers have produced is the Red Bull dude,which was pretty poor and possibly a conspiracy itself.
The Earths not a ball,it's illogical.
The inherent contradictions between quantum theory & Newtonian mechanics has always roused my suspicions....I prefer the common-sense model to metaphysical postulations on the part of physicists.
Yet you just parrot what your take on science tells you.Yes you can repeat whatever you want, sure, but you dont want to engage is a discussion, just parrot the same old stuff from pseudo scientific websites, without any evidence other than repeating "humans are not intelligent" and "we know 4%". Awesome evidence there. Just STFU you aint got shit to discuss other than the broken record.
Yet you just parrot what your take on science tells you.
It's not parroting you have an issue with,it's the fact all these books and theories you've held so dear are wrong.
You parrot out insults and derogatory terms,but it doesn't change the fact you can't prove the earth is a big spinning ball hurtling through space from the magical big bang.
You haven't answered my questions about mechanisms.Ill repeat whatever I want and I've been answering questions for the first about 80 pages and I'm a bit over it. The best evidence the round ballers have produced is the Red Bull dude,which was pretty poor and possibly a conspiracy itself.
The Earths not a ball,it's illogical.
If I'm not looking at it its not there,if I look at it its perceived as round. That questions already been answered,your just parroting the same questions.I dont parrot ANYTHING! i look at the evidence and then decide. Go pickup a telescope and look at other planets, yourself. The evidence is right there. Look at the moon, look the venus, mercury, mars, clearly visible through a telescope.
You havent provided a single evidence for anything other than "we know 4%"..which is nothing really. you might as well just read the bible here, would be more credible.
If I'm not looking at it its not there,if I look at it its perceived as round. That questions already been answered,your just parroting the same questions.
The Earth is flat.

You haven't answered my questions about mechanisms.
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
There's 100 pages here of answers.It's the round ballers who fail to prove their hypothesis as fact as well.My last long post, he has avoided very nicely and silently and went back to the "earth is flat" rhetoric LOL
There's 100 pages here of answers.It's the round ballers who fail to prove their hypothesis as fact as well.
None of us actually know for certain.
I say flat,one way or another 70%, no ones forcing you to believe in it. Even when it's proved 100% within the next 20 years you can still believe the big ball from the Big Bang nonsense, and you can still read your fictional books.

If you have such comprehensive proof as to the nature of the world, and if you have already provided it, it should be a simple matter to reproduce it.There's 100 pages here of answers.It's the round ballers who fail to prove their hypothesis as fact as well.
None of us actually know for certain.
I say flat,one way or another 70%, no ones forcing you to believe in it. Even when it's proved 100% within the next 20 years you can still believe the big ball from the Big Bang nonsense, and you can still read your fictional books.
Yeah his proof, UA mimicking as gravity LMAO and look at the pictures, pictures from the flat earth sites! not willing to believe in NASA but 100 percent trust on yoga gurus. Yet he cant name one credible scientist who can support his hypothesis. I think he is all trolling us and we sucked into this debate and he is having fun at our expense.If you have such comprehensive proof as to the nature of the world, and if you have already provided it, it should be a simple matter to reproduce it.
I mentioned the other day (and you completely ignored it) the prospect of a one-on-one discussion, right here on Big Footy if preferred. I mention it again - are you game?
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
What caused the 10% increase in estimation?There's 100 pages here of answers.It's the round ballers who fail to prove their hypothesis as fact as well.
None of us actually know for certain.
I say flat,one way or another 70%, no ones forcing you to believe in it. Even when it's proved 100% within the next 20 years you can still believe the big ball from the Big Bang nonsense, and you can still read your fictional books.
I called it a long time ago. He's wrapped people around his finger beautifully.Yeah his proof, UA mimicking as gravity LMAO and look at the pictures, pictures from the flat earth sites! not willing to believe in NASA but 100 percent trust on yoga gurus. Yet he cant name one credible scientist who can support his hypothesis. I think he is all trolling us and we sucked into this debate and he is having fun at our expense.
Mind control simulation.Oh if only spaceflight was much cheaper and a space elevator existed...
Suppose darthbards and cannot went up such an elevator, and saw that the Earth is not flat. Will they admit they're wrong or will they claim it's some sort of cgi trickery with the windows being monitors?
I called it a long time ago. He's wrapped people around his finger beautifully.

