Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[darthbards]

Apologies to the readers in this thread but this link contains two big words - "superior mirage".
Over and out.

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwja7bLDptvTAhWKk5QKHWXvAMkQFggwMAU&url=http://www.abc57.com/story/28925566/mirage-of-chicago-skyline-seen-from-michigan-shoreline&usg=AFQjCNG8SFBB7o1rPqwWBZKvP0zYVy_YaQ

Superior Mirage.
Pretty ironic that big word considering all the brainwashed comments we have had on this thread from people supplying a treasure trove of insight into their own ego fuelled belief of self worth while failing to supply actual proof the earth is a ball,spinning and hurtling with magik gravity so strong it's holding everything together,yet so weak no one can actually prove its existence.
A superior mirage indeed. Any other big words you want to play smarty with big boy?

 

[darthbards]

I just want to know from a FE point of view how seasons and the lunar cycles work on a FE model?

My understanding of the science behind the lunar cycle has to do with the altering altitude of the moon as it orbits the north pole.
When it's at the same altitude as the sun (around 3000 mile) it is half illuminated and a first quarter moon occurs.
When it's at its maximum distance below the moon the moon is darkened and a new moon occurs.
When the moon is at its maximum altitude above the sun,the moon is fully illuminated and a full moon occurs.
The other phases obviously happen between these points.

It needs to be remembered that according to real and legitimate science,the moon and Sun are the same size which is a little over 30 miles in circumference.

 

[darthbards]

I have to admit that while learning real science as opposed to the old stuff full of all its lies in school,i do get excited by the shadow object when thinking about the sun and moon etc.
I love it,it reminds me of your old fashioned back pocket,quietly going about its business with very little acknowledgment,while playing such an important role.
My favourite scientific thing is definitely the shadow object.

If I ever have any more children I'm going to name that child Shadow I think in honour of the almighty shadow object. I think it would make a great boy or girls name.

 

[Duritz]

Lol, the shadow object. Such a wonderfully convenient thing!!

 

[darth_timon]

Superior Mirage.
Pretty ironic that big word considering all the brainwashed comments we have had on this thread from people supplying a treasure trove of insight into their own ego fuelled belief of self worth while failing to supply actual proof the earth is a ball,spinning and hurtling with magik gravity so strong it's holding everything together,yet so weak no one can actually prove its existence.
A superior mirage indeed. Any other big words you want to play smarty with big boy?

You've yet to provide a remotely consistent model for FE.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

 

[darthbards]

You've yet to provide a remotely consistent model for FE.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

New science is still learning and I'm not a professor,I don't know everything about FE.
Old science also fails to provide a consistent model for things,but that's not why people are turning away. People can accept not knowing,science is complex,it's the fraud and lies that have turned people away from the old science,which is fair enough.

As I've said before,FE society needs greater funding. You seem inconsistent in this regard that you want answers but don't want to spend the money in the right scientific areas. I disagree with these philosophies.

My suggestion would be to shut down LIGO,cancel all further research there and reopen that facility under the FE umbrella. All funds that were put into LIGO would then be used in research towards flat earth. This would be a fair beginning and with advances in scientific findings,funding would obviously be increased.
Maybe one day our children,God bless them,will even get to experience a real moon landing,maybe even a shadow object landing. I'm not sure if that's possible but imagine how exciting it would be for man to land on the shadow object?

 

[Duritz]

New science is still learning and I'm not a professor,I don't know everything about FE.
Old science also fails to provide a consistent model for things,but that's not why people are turning away. People can accept not knowing,science is complex,it's the fraud and lies that have turned people away from the old science,which is fair enough.

As I've said before,FE society needs greater funding. You seem inconsistent in this regard that you want answers but don't want to spend the money in the right scientific areas. I disagree with these philosophies.

My suggestion would be to shut down LIGO,cancel all further research there and reopen that facility under the FE umbrella. All funds that were put into LIGO would then be used in research towards flat earth. This would be a fair beginning and with advances in scientific findings,funding would obviously be increased.
Maybe one day our children,God bless them,will even get to experience a real moon landing,maybe even a shadow object landing. I'm not sure if that's possible but imagine how exciting it would be for man to land on the shadow object?

Master troll, I bow to you.

 

[darthbards]

Master troll, I bow to you.

I genuinely believe this. Science,and by extension flat earth excites me. To have the rug pulled under the lies and have the truth revealed is great.
I've explained why I love the shadow object. He's the little guy,the unacknowledged,the no fanfare legend.
Even people who believe in the old fraudulent science would have their favourite things or things they get excited about.
All you have to do is mention the words goldilocks and artists impressions and I'm sure there are people from old science who still get as excited as I do with the more modern truthful stuff.
Artists impressions lol,there the real trolls and it costing billions.

 

[NEGAN]

My understanding of the science behind the lunar cycle has to do with the altering altitude of the moon as it orbits the north pole.
When it's at the same altitude as the sun (around 3000 mile) it is half illuminated and a first quarter moon occurs.
When it's at its maximum distance below the moon the moon is darkened and a new moon occurs.
When the moon is at its maximum altitude above the sun,the moon is fully illuminated and a full moon occurs.
The other phases obviously happen between these points.

It needs to be remembered that according to real and legitimate science,the moon and Sun are the same size which is a little over 30 miles in circumference.

Good explanation' but the curbed shadow?

 

[Duritz]

What I love about the shadow object is it only blocks out the moon - never any of the stars! Whenever it passes in front of stars it becomes magik invisible shadow object! All hail magik shadow object!!

 

[darthbards]

Good explanation' but the curbed shadow?

What do you mean?

 

[darth_timon]

New science is still learning and I'm not a professor,I don't know everything about FE.
Old science also fails to provide a consistent model for things,but that's not why people are turning away. People can accept not knowing,science is complex,it's the fraud and lies that have turned people away from the old science,which is fair enough.

As I've said before,FE society needs greater funding. You seem inconsistent in this regard that you want answers but don't want to spend the money in the right scientific areas. I disagree with these philosophies.

My suggestion would be to shut down LIGO,cancel all further research there and reopen that facility under the FE umbrella. All funds that were put into LIGO would then be used in research towards flat earth. This would be a fair beginning and with advances in scientific findings,funding would obviously be increased.
Maybe one day our children,God bless them,will even get to experience a real moon landing,maybe even a shadow object landing. I'm not sure if that's possible but imagine how exciting it would be for man to land on the shadow object?

Even the chief proponents of FE theory know very little about it. They cannot explain how the sun is powered without the mass/density/gravity relationship. There is no consensus on the alternative to gravity in regards to how we don't go flying off the earth.

Quite why we should supplant decades of study and evidence with ill-thought out, unscientific ideas masquerading as science, is beyond me.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

 

[darthbards]

What I love about the shadow object is it only blocks out the moon - never any of the stars! Whenever it passes in front of stars it becomes magik invisible shadow object! All hail magik shadow object!!

The shadow object orbits in close proximity to the sun. This is why it has no interference with the observation of the night stars.

 

[darthbards]

Even the chief proponents of FE theory know very little about it. They cannot explain how the sun is powered without the mass/density/gravity relationship. There is no consensus on the alternative to gravity in regards to how we don't go flying off the earth.

Quite why we should supplant decades of study and evidence with ill-thought out, unscientific ideas masquerading as science, is beyond me.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

Are you for real? There is no gravity. It's why LIGO had to team up with other frauds like Lawrence Krause to announce falsified findings via Twitter to keep there funding.
Flat earth is science,you just don't like that part of science. If you don't want to supply funds,don't ask questions,you cannot have it both ways I'm afraid.

The fraudulent old science gives us very little bang for our buck so I wouldn't get to precious with the ill thought out comments regarding real science.
The old fraudulent sciences days are numbered,it's why your absolutely petrified for funding to be distributed into the right areas.
I understand you think science is just another religion but some of us are about seeking answers and the truth. Answers and the truth will be found,your religious belief in a mythical round world will be seen for the lie it is.
The FE theory is very much growing in popularity and deserves greater funding and wider acknowledgement in schooling.

 

[darth_timon]

Are you for real? There is no gravity. It's why LIGO had to team up with other frauds like Lawrence Krause to announce falsified findings via Twitter to keep there funding.
Flat earth is science,you just don't like that part of science. If you don't want to supply funds,don't ask questions,you cannot have it both ways I'm afraid.

The fraudulent old science gives us very little bang for our buck so I wouldn't get to precious with the ill thought out comments regarding real science.
The old fraudulent sciences days are numbered,it's why your absolutely petrified for funding to be distributed into the right areas.
I understand you think science is just another religion but some of us are about seeking answers and the truth. Answers and the truth will be found,your religious belief in a mythical round world will be seen for the lie it is.
The FE theory is very much growing in popularity and deserves greater funding and wider acknowledgement in schooling.

Yes, I am for real. As is gravity.

It is ironic - you have repeatedly referred to the scientific method as a religious belief. That is your stance, and I'll thank you not to confuse it with mine. Evidence-driven arguments are not religious arguments, whereas shadow objects most definitely fall into faith-driven positions. The only way to provide any hint of evidence for such things (as well as UA or repulsion) is to mangle the existing evidence so thoroughly as to do away with it.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

 

[Procrastinator35]

Sorry darthbards....Couldn't help myself mate:

 

[darthbards]

Yes, I am for real. As is gravity.

It is ironic - you have repeatedly referred to the scientific method as a religious belief. That is your stance, and I'll thank you not to confuse it with mine. Evidence-driven arguments are not religious arguments, whereas shadow objects most definitely fall into faith-driven positions. The only way to provide any hint of evidence for such things (as well as UA or repulsion) is to mangle the existing evidence so thoroughly as to do away with it.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

Sorry mate,your side of our religion has had ample opportunity and plenty of funding to supply answers but is now being proven the fraudulent liar that it is.
It's now new sciences time to shine. The number of people realising that not only is the earth not round,but how utterly ridiculous it sounds is growing by the day.
Your side of science has failed because of its lies and fraudsters. How long did you seriously think people were going to buy the ball spinning and hurtling,rotating a Sun millions of miles away that's also hurtling? It total nonsense.

We have evidence of the shadow object,how do you think eclipses happen? And don't even bother with your old science lies and fairytales,humanity is sick of them.

Stick to your blog mate,and leave the real,honest science to the Big boys.

 

[darthbards]

Sorry darthbards....Couldn't help myself mate:

Cat Stevens is actually a clever man I guess.
He certainly knew we were being lied to about a whole manner of things.

 

[NEGAN]

What do you mean?

The earths shadow on the moon it's curbed before a full lunar eclipse.Happens only 2 times a year on round earth model.

How does this happen on a flat earth model?

 

[darthbards]

The earths shadow on the moon it's curbed before a full lunar eclipse.Happens only 2 times a year on round earth model.

How does this happen on a flat earth model?

Shadow object?

 

[NEGAN]

Shadow object?

I must read more about this shadow object.

 

[exe ex machina]

Home team rules apply. Flat Earth is established as the "fact" in this thread, in this board. The burden of proof is for the away team to provide evidence for a ball earth. So the FE'ers debunk them one at a time, until we might arrive at some evidence that holds up for debate.

 

[Total Power]

Home team rules apply. Flat Earth is established as the "fact" in this thread, in this board. The burden of proof is for the away team to provide evidence for a ball earth. So the FE'ers debunk them one at a time, until we might arrive at some evidence that holds up for debate.

I have questioned the FE concepts. Please explain the calculations behind UA. I do understand home team rules apply, but i am asking valid questions, i am not abusing anyone nor i am going off topic or calling anything garbage without evidence. UA is garbage i just provided you the evidence.

Another question for you GG.

If the sun is rising in London, shouldn't it be smaller? considering its furthest away? and biggest during the midday when its right above us? why is it not the case? things do seem smaller when they are at a distance right? or in the magical world of flat earth its the other way around

 

[exe ex machina]

I have questioned the FE concepts. Please explain the calculations behind UA. I do understand home team rules apply, but i am asking valid questions, i am not abusing anyone nor i am going off topic or calling anything garbage without evidence. UA is garbage i just provided you the evidence.

Another question for you GG.

If the sun is rising in London, shouldn't it be smaller? considering its furthest away? and biggest during the midday when its right above us? why is it not the case? things do seem smaller when they are at a distance right? or in the magical world of flat earth its the other way around

I have no problem with you or your line of enquiry on this board. Just simply proposing that burden of proof is with flowers to prove the globe. Just like the Obama thread, burden of proof is to prove she's a woman.

 

[exe ex machina]

**globers not flowers ^