Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure

Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

JackOutback said:
I don't actually get that your numbers are increasing. I imagine I will be laughing until the day I die, which is still many years away (fingers crossed).
Click to expand...
And while your busy laughing Jack have a think about this...young people love celebrities,the FES has and is recruiting celebrities,we are concentrating on the next generation yet our numbers are already growing and growing and growing.:)
 
Last edited:
JackOutback said:
I don't know if this has been addressed but is just the Earth flat or all the planets in our solar system? Or have all the images been tampered with?
Click to expand...

I'm sick of the ignorant $cience cult ball lovers coming in here and asking the same ridiculous questions over and over again. Ball lover - listen up: that question has been asked and answered. If you can't be ****ed reading the thread then all that does is confirms that you're an ignoramus ready to accept whatever people tell you instead of researching for yourself and finding out for yourself. This thread is for people who value research and answers, not for those who want to be spoon fed. If you want to be spoon fed, leave the thread and go to Starbucks, and ask for an extra large triple chocolate mochanasa, with sprinklings of lies and a fabrication whip. This thread is only open to truth seekers and people who value research and its rewards.

If you expect to come in here again with your "I can't be bothered reading" crap then you'd better re-think. If you really want the answer to your question, read the thread. If you just want someone to spoon feed you lies, head to the science board.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Duritz said:
This thread is only open to truth seekers and people who value research and its rewards.

If you expect to come in here again with your "I can't be bothered reading" crap then you'd better re-think. If you really want the answer to your question, read the thread. If you just want someone to spoon feed you lies, head to the science board.
Click to expand...
I've read your book - I think I'll pass thanks.

images
 
Present Not Past said:
I've read your book - I think I'll pass thanks.

images
Click to expand...
More childish nothing comments from the ball lovers as they have no real scientific answers as the FES continues to grow.
While it would be nice for the integrity of the discussion that those with nothing intelligent or on topic to say were kept away,nothing would surprise me in the tactics of the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science.
 
Present Not Past said:
I've read your book - I think I'll pass thanks.

images
Click to expand...

This is the typical response of the ball loving $cience devotee. They remind me of another cult who has loaned their name - Scientology: they tell themselves that their cult is the truth, only they know the answers and any who seek to question are wrong and must be laughed at. Well, it might work for Tom Cruise but Leah Remini has seen the light and come out of that cult, and now members of the ball loving cult are coming out too and declaring they no longer love balls. However, you are still stuck fast in the pit, indoctrinated into the sham that is $cience, and like JackOutback happy to believe the obvious lies fed to you.

Don't believe me? Here's yet another proof: go to Augusta, WA. I was recently there, it's the most south western point of Australia. Between that point and The ice wall (what you call Antartica) there is no land, just ocean. Of course we can't see the wall from there because it's around 6000 kms away, but what you can see is hundreds of kilometres of flat ocean. If the earth were round you should see less than 100 kms only.

I personally observed a fishing trawler come from 200km to the south and travel past me to the north, towards Fremantle, which by the way is a shit city full of drug addicts. I know this ship came from 200km away because I timed his speed on passing me by measuring how long it took him to pass the lighthouse, then the cafe, which was a distance of 130 metres. (I know it was this distance because after the ship had passed I paced it out. My strides are exactly 1m in length and I strode exactly 130 times. I paced it five or six times to make certain and it was the same every time. That is proof, researched in the field, not $cience lies). I had also timed how long it took for him to reach me after he had appeared in my limited human vision, and this showed that he was around 230kms to the south when I first spotted him. (I am calling the ship him because in this age of gender equality I think it is sexist and misandronic to refer to a ship by the female gender).

I also spotted a bird flying towards me from the south, the majestic seagull I believe it was, and he never varied his height, relative to the ocean. He flew in a straight line the entire time, around 20m above sea level. If the earth was round then when I spotted him first many kilometres out to sea this would have made him much higher than 20m above sea level. Are we to believe this majestic bird flies in a straight line while the earth curves beneath him? Or are we to believe the more obvious truth - he flies parallel with the flat earth below him. Occam's razor - whatever the most obvious answer is must be true. Hence, the earth is flat.

$cience may lie but Mother Nature and the majestic seagull do not. They fly the shortest route from one point to another. They do not fly higher than the curved earth in order to propagate the NA$A and $cience and Je$uit lie. The majestic seagull has no interest in your lies, it flies in a straight line parallel to the flat earth below. Shortest route possible to the chips it stole from the plate on the outside table at the cafe, 130m from where I stood.

Ball loving myth busted.
 
Last edited:
Duritz said:
This is the typical response of the ball loving $cience devotee. They remind me of another cult who has loaned their name - Scientology: they tell themselves that their cult is the truth, only they know the answers and any who seek to question are wrong and must be laughed at. Well, it might work for Tom Cruise but Leah Remini has seen the light and come out of that cult, and now members of the ball loving cult are coming out too and declaring they no longer love balls. However, you are still stuck fast in the pit, indoctrinated into the sham that is $cience, and like JackOutback happy to believe the obvious lies fed to you.

Don't believe me? Here's yet another proof: go to Augusta, WA. I was recently there, it's the most south western point of Australia. Between that point and The ice wall (what you call Antartica) there is no land, just ocean. Of course we can't see the wall from there because it's around 6000 kms away, but what you can see is hundreds of kilometres of flat ocean. If the earth were round you should see less than 100 kms only.

I personally observed a fishing trawler come from 200km to the south and travel past me to the north, towards Fremantle, which by the way is a shit city full of drug addicts. I know this ship came from 200km away because I timed his speed on passing me by measuring how long it took him to pass the lighthouse, then the cafe, which was a distance of 130 metres. (I know it was this distance because after the ship had passed I paced it out. My strides are exactly 1m in length and I strode exactly 130 times. I paced it five or six times to make certain and it was the same every time. That is proof, researched in the field, not $cience lies). I had also timed how long it took for him to reach me after he had appeared in my limited human vision, and this showed that he was around 230kms to the south when I first spotted him. (I am calling the ship him because in this age of gender equality I think it is sexist and misandronic to refer to a ship by the female gender).

I also spotted a bird flying towards me from the south, the majestic seagull I believe it was, and he never varied his height, relative to the ocean. He flew in a straight line the entire time, around 20m above sea level. If the earth was round then when I spotted him first many kilometres out to sea this would have made him much higher than 20m above sea level. Are we to believe this majestic bird flies in a straight line while the earth curves beneath him? Or are we to believe the more obvious truth - he flies parallel with the flat earth below him. Occam's razor - whatever the most obvious answer is must be true. Hence, the earth is flat.

Ball loving myth busted.
Click to expand...
Pics or GTFO.
 
Quivorir said:
How ******* big was this bird?
Click to expand...

I am not sure. I didn't attempt to capture him and weigh him. I did not, at the time, anticipate that I'd ever be called upon to remark upon his weight. He was well fed, I could see that, obviously they do a roaring trade in chips at the lighthouse cafe.
 
Quivorir said:
How ******* big was this bird?
Click to expand...
Duritz said:
I am not sure. I didn't attempt to capture him and weigh him. I did not, at the time, anticipate that I'd ever be called upon to remark upon his weight. He was well fed, I could see that, obviously they do a roaring trade in chips at the lighthouse cafe.
Click to expand...
Follow up question, if I may. How good are your ****ing eyes?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Duritz said:
This is the typical response of the ball loving $cience devotee. They remind me of another cult who has loaned their name - Scientology: they tell themselves that their cult is the truth, only they know the answers and any who seek to question are wrong and must be laughed at. Well, it might work for Tom Cruise but Leah Remini has seen the light and come out of that cult, and now members of the ball loving cult are coming out too and declaring they no longer love balls. However, you are still stuck fast in the pit, indoctrinated into the sham that is $cience, and like JackOutback happy to believe the obvious lies fed to you.

Don't believe me? Here's yet another proof: go to Augusta, WA. I was recently there, it's the most south western point of Australia. Between that point and The ice wall (what you call Antartica) there is no land, just ocean. Of course we can't see the wall from there because it's around 6000 kms away, but what you can see is hundreds of kilometres of flat ocean. If the earth were round you should see less than 100 kms only.

I personally observed a fishing trawler come from 200km to the south and travel past me to the north, towards Fremantle, which by the way is a shit city full of drug addicts. I know this ship came from 200km away because I timed his speed on passing me by measuring how long it took him to pass the lighthouse, then the cafe, which was a distance of 130 metres. (I know it was this distance because after the ship had passed I paced it out. My strides are exactly 1m in length and I strode exactly 130 times. I paced it five or six times to make certain and it was the same every time. That is proof, researched in the field, not $cience lies). I had also timed how long it took for him to reach me after he had appeared in my limited human vision, and this showed that he was around 230kms to the south when I first spotted him. (I am calling the ship him because in this age of gender equality I think it is sexist and misandronic to refer to a ship by the female gender).

I also spotted a bird flying towards me from the south, the majestic seagull I believe it was, and he never varied his height, relative to the ocean. He flew in a straight line the entire time, around 20m above sea level. If the earth was round then when I spotted him first many kilometres out to sea this would have made him much higher than 20m above sea level. Are we to believe this majestic bird flies in a straight line while the earth curves beneath him? Or are we to believe the more obvious truth - he flies parallel with the flat earth below him. Occam's razor - whatever the most obvious answer is must be true. Hence, the earth is flat.

$cience may lie but Mother Nature and the majestic seagull do not. They fly the shortest route from one point to another. They do not fly higher than the curved earth in order to propagate the NA$A and $cience and Je$uit lie. The majestic seagull has no interest in your lies, it flies in a straight line parallel to the flat earth below. Shortest route possible to the chips it stole from the plate on the outside table at the cafe, 130m from where I stood.

Ball loving myth busted.
Click to expand...
It's only 32m from the lighthouse to the cafe, so the boat must have come from even further away, somewhere around 800km
 
tants said:
It's only 32m from the lighthouse to the cafe, so the boat must have come from even further away, somewhere around 800km
Click to expand...
Correction it's 320m away. Science was wrong. So you only saw the boat from ~60km away.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

tants said:
It's only 32m from the lighthouse to the cafe, so the boat must have come from even further away, somewhere around 800km
Click to expand...

Incorrect. I paced it out five or six times and it was exactly 130m. I even got my wife to stand at the cafe and I kicked a football as hard as I could using the drop punt kick and I only got around 1/3 of the distance.
 
Present Not Past said:
It's a fail because the photo shows a few hundred metres of ocean, not the few hundred kilometres of ocean that the poster claimed he could see.
Click to expand...
But look at how straight the edge is to the ocean, no way you could get the edge that straight on a round earth.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

Similar threads

A11dAtP0w3R
NWO/Illuminati Charlie Kirk was assassinated by Mossad and/or the CIA... Change my mind
7 8 9 10 11
Replies
272
Views
11K
HitTheNailOnTheHead
HitTheNailOnTheHead

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top