Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Seems to make more sense to the youngsters I'm teaching real science to as opposed to the spinning hurtling ball through infinite space theory.And like I've also said previously,the only downside has been the bullying in the playground its seeming to cause to all the kids getting taught and still believing the old brainwashed stuff you can't appear to get over.
Yeah, my kids believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and that cartoon characters are real. Not sure the fact your stories make sense to them is a compelling argument.
 
Yeah, my kids believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and that cartoon characters are real. Not sure the fact your stories make sense to them is a compelling argument.
At the FES we would relate stories of Santa to mythical balls spinning and hurtling with majik unproven Gravity, so I fail to see the point in your baby talk argument. Why mention these people if not as a pointless means of deflections from the topic at hand and the proof we provide.
Both sides could talk of Santa as a childish case study.

On this thread we give the answers,we are providing connections to what the future moves will be from the fraudulent religion of institutionalised science,and we are getting a glimpse of how and why the Malli Vanilli/Betty Boo scientists are being thrust before us,as well as their connections to future fraudulent claims.

At the FES we encourage the baby talk from the ball loving rim bashers as our members continue to swell,while we will continue on the long and important journey of teaching the next generation real science and the wonders of the flat plane on which we live.
 
Last edited:
...Interestingly I asked the science teacher about string theory to which he replied it was taught in part in years 11&12,I asked about holographic flat black holes containing flat universes and he said parts were touched upon,whatever that means. I did ask about Simulation Theory to which the science dude said it was not taught but he did say he would be more than happy to discuss that theory if a student asked outside of what they were being taught during the school year.

My guess is he's going to be a little shocked in 5-10 years time how much the kids coming through his classes know about Flat Earth and his sob jobs will only increase.

i wonder what his thoughts on the Trans-Planckian problem are
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

i wonder what his thoughts on the Trans-Planckian problem are
Not sure,but if he was to be correct the first thing he'd say is it disproves inflation,thereby disproving the almighty majikal bigbang.

There is obviously smaller units than Planck length. At the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science they fail to admit that their theories are not only incomplete,but in actual fact rather wrong.
The mistake the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science makes is not only do they believe the earth is a majik ball,they also consider the universe to be 3 dimensional.
The universe is like our planet itself,only much flatter. These universes,as I'm aware you also understand cannot,are contained inside black holes which are also flat.

At the FES,myself and some of my more switched on colleagues believe that not only is the theory of majik Gravity nonscencical,but the theory of space time and bigbangs also falls into the nonsensical category.
 
Not sure,but if he was to be correct the first thing he'd say is it disproves inflation,thereby disproving the almighty majikal bigbang.

There is obviously smaller units than Planck length. At the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science they fail to admit that their theories are not only incomplete,but in actual fact rather wrong.
The mistake the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science makes is not only do they believe the earth is a majik ball,they also consider the universe to be 3 dimensional.
The universe is like our planet itself,only much flatter. These universes,as I'm aware you also understand cannot,are contained inside black holes which are also flat.

At the FES,myself and some of my more switched on colleagues believe that not only is the theory of majik Gravity nonscencical,but the theory of space time and bigbangs also falls into the nonsensical category.
I wonder if the school globes have been discarded and changed to an oblique spheroid model. Where the earth will be described as pear shaped in classrooms.
 
Seriously you're just taking the piss now.
Are you a school teacher by any chance?
Every comment you make is both a poor deflection or some extremely poor attempt at gatekeeping your religious standpoint.
 
Last edited:
Are you a school teacher by any chance?
Every comment you make is both a poor deflection or some extremely poor at attempt to gatekeep your religious standpoint.
Hopefully they are proving gravity in classes now instead of dropping a white board marker.

Who knows? Maybe they are hanging 2 balls off a ceiling and observing it's movement.
 
I wonder if the school globes have been discarded and changed to an oblique spheroid model. Where the earth will be described as pear shaped in classrooms.
You'd think if the religion of fraudulent and institutionalised science were confident in the utter garbage they spew forth they would.
It's actually one of the questions I ask my students....if the earth is an oblique spheroid why are the globes still a ball? What are these people teaching you if it's not a lie?
 
You'd think if the religion of fraudulent and institutionalised science were confident in the utter garbage they spew forth they would.
It's actually one of the questions I ask my students....if the earth is an oblique spheroid why are the globes still a ball? What are these people teaching you if it's not a lie?
Cmon Darthy, they have only had 60 years unlimited resources and Budget to get it right can't expect too much.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

A sniper with Canada’s elite special forces in Iraq has shattered the world record for the longest confirmed kill shot in military history at a staggering distance of 3,450 metres.

impressive
 
A sniper with Canada’s elite special forces in Iraq has shattered the world record for the longest confirmed kill shot in military history at a staggering distance of 3,450 metres.

impressive

Must've been a hell of a shot to curve around the earth
 
Must've been a hell of a shot to curve around the earth
If you read the article properly it stated that wind, elevation and curvature of the Earth were all accounted for by the snipers assistant. Canadian snipers work in pairs, one asseses the conditions and the mathematics involved the other lines it up as and pulls the trigger.

Maybe they were corrupt NASA snipers?
 
If you read the article properly it stated that wind, elevation and curvature of the Earth were all accounted for by the snipers assistant. Canadian snipers work in pairs, one asseses the conditions and the mathematics involved the other lines it up as and pulls the trigger.

Maybe they were corrupt NASA snipers?

do rail guns work in pairs?
 
If you read the article properly it stated that wind, elevation and curvature of the Earth were all accounted for by the snipers assistant. Canadian snipers work in pairs, one asseses the conditions and the mathematics involved the other lines it up as and pulls the trigger.

Maybe they were corrupt NASA snipers?

LOL he "accounted for the curve of the earth" did he? I wonder how that conversation went??

Canadian A: Hey I been thinking aboot this shoot you're about to took and I've been thinking aboot hoow to accoont for the coovatoore of the earth. Now, we are trying to shoot this loot in the foot and he's aboot 3.5 kms away. So, by my calculootions you are gooing to have to shoot, to shoot the loot aboot in the foot, this boollet into the ground about 2 kiloometers away. Then we're going to have to hoop like shoot the shoot goes through the doot and hits the loot in the foot. Goot it moot?

Canadian B: Except moot the earth is floot.

*Bang!*

Shot rings out, target hit, flat earth proven yet again.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I looked at sniper shots calculations and I couldn't find one that took into account the Coralis effect or earth curve.

Height,
wind direction,
distance to target.

Sniper may estimate "gravity" effect on the bullet.

In a matter of fact it's done on a App these days.


But I am happy to be proven wrong I am not 100% on this answer.

Some shooters say they do, some say it's a load of sh** and they are making excuses for missing the target.
 
LOL he "accounted for the curve of the earth" did he? I wonder how that conversation went??

Canadian A: Hey I been thinking aboot this shoot you're about to took and I've been thinking aboot hoow to accoont for the coovatoore of the earth. Now, we are trying to shoot this loot in the foot and he's aboot 3.5 kms away. So, by my calculootions you are gooing to have to shoot, to shoot the loot aboot in the foot, this boollet into the ground about 2 kiloometers away. Then we're going to have to hoop like shoot the shoot goes through the doot and hits the loot in the foot. Goot it moot?

Canadian B: Except moot the earth is floot.

*Bang!*

Shot rings out, target hit, flat earth proven yet again.

So the assistant was a Kiwi then?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom