Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Ok.

How did someone like Earhart navigate back in the day using such a model? Or is her disappearance another factor in Flat Earth theory?

I think at this stage people on both sides want to hard truths and not accepting 2nd hand info anymore as a lot of what has come out in these debates has been shown either to inaccurate or fabricated.


It's like a flat earther saying why did it take captain cook over 3 years and 60 000 miles to circle Antarctica?

People now just want hard facts which this flight "might" of provided.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I’d also like to hear theories on why absolutely everyone involved in modern navigation would cover such a thing up. Not sure it could be done.

I mean, I’m just a regular guy but Vancouver could be in the middle of the Indian Ocean for all I care. Wouldn’t make a difference to my life. So why would some freight ship captain from Chile go out of his way.
 
I’d also like to hear theories on why absolutely everyone involved in modern navigation would cover such a thing up. Not sure it could be done.

I mean, I’m just a regular guy but Vancouver could be in the middle of the Indian Ocean for all I care. Wouldn’t make a difference to my life. So why would some freight ship captain from Chile go out of his way.


They wouldn't be involved in anything ,navigation works on a flat earth...only going over the south pole doesn't....

Actually the southern hemisphere is broken on a flat earth flight navigation but can be explained using jet streams...

Another weird story about this aswell when flat earthers found these jet streams maps on a website ( the flat earth AE map indicating the jet streams)also got totally wiped from the website. Passed off as first broken, then just disappeared.
 
Hmm. How about pilots then? I flew Gatwick to Calgary and we did an arc over Greenland and came down through the north of Canada. Does that work on one of the flat Earth maps?
No idea ...you would have to plot it out and see what it looks like.

You will find anomalies in flights both on the globe and flat earth maps.

As far as pilots they look at their equipment which tells them whats what..

I have seen pilots absolutely reject everything flat earth and then some pilots absolutely push flat earth.
 
There's a video on YT where a guy takes a flight and records how his compass and other telematics record the trip and it doesnt work on a globe map . Some trip that was supposedly a direct trip from one southern hemisphere continent to another. Like Australia to south America.
 
Hmm. How about pilots then? I flew Gatwick to Calgary and we did an arc over Greenland and came down through the north of Canada. Does that work on one of the flat Earth maps?


I will tell you one thing.

I believe the heliocentric model is a load of shit, I don't really have an opinion on the shape of the earth.

All these questions you have

There is only 1 thing imo that absolutely proves the heliocentric model to be correct. That's the moon landing ...whether you believe it or not is up to you.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I am glad you used a picture to communicate....anything outside of a meme or picture is beyond his comprehension.

ZING!

Your humour is pretty...FLATline, if you get my drift.
 
Got a gift for you to help you out in life...


View attachment 547871

Just point to either Yellow and red, they are your areas of communication.

Ooh, I pick GREEN for knowing the Earth is ROUND because Im not a paranoid conspiracy nutcase.

Actually, Im a level ABOVE your mere conspiracy. I believe conspiracys are the REAL conspiracy, and you are just trying to blind us to what is the original truth by making up all these so called real truths.

You just got Conspired.
 


Wow.

Is the maker of that video not aware there is more atmosphere to look through facing 70km horizontally than 235k miles vertically?

It's easier to see a satellite flying overhead orbiting 100s of miles abov the earth than it is to see a car on the horizon for a reason.
 
Wow.

Is the maker of that video not aware there is more atmosphere to look through facing 70km horizontally than 235k miles vertically?

It's easier to see a satellite flying overhead orbiting 100s of miles abov the earth than it is to see a car on the horizon for a reason.
But but but if the Earth was flat I would be able to see mt Everest from my backyard...:drunk:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Wow.

Is the maker of that video not aware there is more atmosphere to look through facing 70km horizontally than 235k miles vertically?

It's easier to see a satellite flying overhead orbiting 100s of miles abov the earth than it is to see a car on the horizon for a reason.
There would be a lot of things the maker of that video is unaware of.
 
Wtf are you even on about funboy?

Where's that model you promised?

Ive posted plenty of models. You refuse to accept any model that isnt your own eyeballs several million kilometers outside of the solar system so you can see it for yourself.
 
Ive posted plenty of models. You refuse to accept any model that isnt your own eyeballs several million kilometers outside of the solar system so you can see it for yourself.
You post no models, only pictures...

You actually believe I asked you to do it to scale, like it is the only reason why it can't be modeled. The scale of it only adds to the absurdity of it. I only said do it to scale just in the hope that you would point out another particular reason why it can't be modeled.

I will give you a clue

It needs a hail mary in refraction to work ...hence why you can only produce fancy artwork to "illustrate" how it works.

This is a quote directly from the article YOU posted.


"It sounds impossible - an eclipse occurs when the Sun, Earth and Moon are in a straight line - meaning you couldn't see the Moon and the Sun at the same time"

^hopefully now you understand why it can't be modeled on any scale let alone the one that is the reality of the heliocentric model.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You post no models, only pictures...

You actually believe I asked you to do it to scale, like it is the only reason why it can't be modeled. The scale of it only adds to the absurdity of it. I only said do it to scale just in the hope that you would point out another particular reason why it can't be modeled.

I will give you a clue

It needs a hail mary in refraction to work ...hence why you can only produce fancy artwork to "illustrate" how it works.

This is a quote directly from the article YOU posted.


"It sounds impossible - an eclipse occurs when the Sun, Earth and Moon are in a straight line - meaning you couldn't see the Moon and the Sun at the same time"

^hopefully now you understand why it can't be modeled on any scale let alone the one that is the reality of the heliocentric model.

What gibberish is this?

I saw you mention models and read on in hope that maybe you had one for once that we could discuss.

Clearly not.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom