The future of the ABC - Guthrie sacked

Remove this Banner Ad

What else do you expect with a weak CEO who won't stand up to a stacked board and chairperson who doing the bidding of Murdoch and his sock puppet #scottyfrommarketing.

pUuAdDt.jpg
We'll be lucky to have an ABC by the next election.

Labor's not going to reinstitute funding for it, either; Ida's done her work too well. It serves to disenfranchise lefties whilst pandering to progressives and furthering the culture wars.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There's a word for governments who attempt to control the output of an independent media organisation. Seven letter word beginning with 'f' and ending with 'm'.

Now we have Fletcher pressuring the ABC over a program. Places the letter on Twitter then turns off replies. Weak as piss.

 
Ha exactly the problem these days, and it's the same in the UK with the BBC - the centre and right complain about the ABC being left-wing, and then the HARD LEFT complain about it being not left enough, and somehow these equate to ABC being in the middle, not biased and doing its job. When actually it all equates to the ABC being centre-left.

Look, let me put it this way - why do you think those of the centre and right even waste their time to say the ABC is left-wing biased if it isn't? I mean, when the left spend their time telling me Murdoch is right-wing biased, I listen, and I agree - of course it is biased. Of course they aren't wasting their time complaining about it. The journos of course do a great job, but the bias is clear for all to see, even if there isn't some lurking background "mission statement" to be right-wing.
Why isn't there ranting and raving about Channel 9 being biased a certain way? It has a far greater and more influential audience! Why would the right complain about poorly watched ABC News if it ISN'T biased, and considering the expenditure isn't that great on it anyway?


The report labelled the episode of The Drum, aired on May 6, "one-sided" finding it was characterised by "not just a positive impression for policies identified with Labor’s platform but also at times a marked enthusiasm for a Labor victory".
The review also examined four episodes of the ABC's flagship political discussion program Insiders aired across the election period, identifying "similar, but less serious concerns" in two episodes.
"There appeared to be a substantial shortfall in positive reflection of the Coalition’s prospects, policies or performance compared to Labor," the report said.

"This was not related to the expression of opinions but the weight of analysis, where the positive impression for Labor across all contributions in two episodes far outweighed that for the Coalition."

It concluded that the ABC would benefit from broadening its pool of contributors to better reflect the range of perspectives available to discuss a given topic.
"One solution would have been to have secured more conservative-leaning political commentators as panellists. Those conservative voices could have articulated, with conviction, that there was a Coalition path to victory," the report said.

The review also analysed 51 items on the Australia Votes pages of the ABC News website and found that the articles were four times as likely to reflect a negative assessment of the Coalition than to reflect a negative assessment of Labor.
 

The report labelled the episode of The Drum, aired on May 6, "one-sided" finding it was characterised by "not just a positive impression for policies identified with Labor’s platform but also at times a marked enthusiasm for a Labor victory".
The review also examined four episodes of the ABC's flagship political discussion program Insiders aired across the election period, identifying "similar, but less serious concerns" in two episodes.
"There appeared to be a substantial shortfall in positive reflection of the Coalition’s prospects, policies or performance compared to Labor," the report said.

"This was not related to the expression of opinions but the weight of analysis, where the positive impression for Labor across all contributions in two episodes far outweighed that for the Coalition."

It concluded that the ABC would benefit from broadening its pool of contributors to better reflect the range of perspectives available to discuss a given topic.
"One solution would have been to have secured more conservative-leaning political commentators as panellists. Those conservative voices could have articulated, with conviction, that there was a Coalition path to victory," the report said.

The review also analysed 51 items on the Australia Votes pages of the ABC News website and found that the articles were four times as likely to reflect a negative assessment of the Coalition than to reflect a negative assessment of Labor.
Perhaps look a little deeper next time, unlike the review.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Congrats to 7news and scomo for the deal with Google. Hope murdoch join the party. And then there is the *ed step child abc. Worst of the worst strike a deal and stop taking our tax money.

The sooner we can defund abc the better.
 
Congrats to 7news and scomo for the deal with Google. Hope murdoch join the party. And then there is the ******ed step child abc. Worst of the worst strike a deal and stop taking our tax money.

The sooner we can defund abc the better.

Just watching 4 corners expose on Russian 'dark' money laundering in Australia.

You just don't get that sort of investigative journalism in the Murdoch press.

I wonder why?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top