- Moderator
- #12,326
Yeh, I do think the ufc does underpay to a degree but that a little much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah, UFC are stingy. They should double the pay of every single one of their fighters.
Possibly a tad too much but, if the ufc are only paying about 18% of total revenue to their fighters I don't mind a double up.Yeh, I do think the ufc does underpay to a degree but that a little much.
Possibly a tad too much but, if the ufc are only paying about 18% of total revenue to their fighters I don't mind a double up.
Flipside of this is they only bring in 10k worth of revenue. They are completely interchangeable with literally any other fighter in that timeslot so why do they deserve more?Don't forget that the pay isn't evenly spread. There are UFC fighters that take home as little as $10k for a fight, which is before they pay their team. Even if you fight 3x a year, $30k is very low for a televised professional athlete.
That said, who cares? UFC fighters must be happy or theyd surely have done something about it. All fans need to care about is the fights being good
Flipside of this is they only bring in 10k worth of revenue. They are completely interchangeable with literally any other fighter in that timeslot so why do they deserve more?
There's literally nothing other than flexibility stopping these guys having jobs as well. Some NBL, AFLW, BBL, even some A-League players. Economically you could make a case the curtain jerkers are overpaid more than under
UFC should be giving out more of a revenue split but it isn't really the lower end that is underpaid. It's the main carders, 'names', and main eventers who bring in the money
Ones that make an iota of sense (Poirer choosing Conor over a title shot for example), sureSo you can see phantom13 's point about not blaming fighters for chasing money fights?
How much would Usman make v Nate opposed to Colby or Leon or whoever else you think is more worthy?Ones that make an iota of sense (Poirer choosing Conor over a title shot for example), sure
Usman v Nate is a dumb idea and always will be which is what sparked that debat
The sport dies when fights that don't make sense happen too oftenHow much would Usman make v Nate opposed to Colby or Leon or whoever else you think is more worthy?
You and I have no idea and even if we did, whats the threshold for whats worthwhile. Is it $10k is it $5m? Thats really up to Usman now isnt it.
The sport dies when fights that don't make sense happen too often
Conor v DP makes sense
Usman v Nate doesn't and likely never will
Genuinely not sure why this is so hard to grasp
I never said it dies over 1 fight, but people would lose interest doing nonsensical fightsThe sport dies... Jesus, bit hyperbolic dont you think. If the sport survived Bones running a pregnant woman off the road and a dude nearly beating his pornstar girlfirend to death i think it will survive Usman taking an easy paycheck with a few extra digits on it for fighting Nate.
Ryz is bang on, youre here saying the UFC needs to pay guys more but then begrudging a guy trying to make more money.
I get your point make the Covington fight worth as much or more than the Diaz fight but you cant then pick and choose when its okay. Dustin v Conor is only different because the differential is higher, the principle is exactly the same. If anything its worse cause its a guy passing up a title shot for a different fight. Usman is the champ and has beaten most of the top contenders in his division.
I never said it dies over 1 fight, but people would lose interest doing nonsensical fights
I never said they needed to pay anyone more. I just pointed out it isn't the curtain jerkers who are underpaid, they bring in nothing. If the fighters don't do anything about their pay, why does anyone care after all these years? Just watch the fights
I have also never said anything about 'money fights' but they need to make sense. Defending Nate v Usman is really, really stupid. Really stupid. End of
DP v Conor makes sense for multiple reasons. It's an actual rivalry where they're 1-1 & the winner will fight for a title shot anyway & people want to see it. Usman v Nate - LOL
Interim titles are ******* stupid. But get in there and fight, Francis. AFAIK, he was offered 2 dates for the Lewis fight and turned both down.
When? He fought 3 months ago. What turnaround would suit you?Don't get me wrong, I absolutely hate interim titles in general. UFC hand them out far too willly nilly. But this dudes job is a cage fighter. Get in there and do your job.
The August fight he was offered. 3 to 4 fights a year isn't too much to ask. Its not like he took any damage from the Stipe fight and was off healing.When? He fought 3 months ago. What turnaround would suit you?
Go have a look at the HW championship history, no one has done 3-4 a year, in fact 3-4 a year for any fighter is an enormous ask (let alone heavyweights), thats why they make such a big deal out of it when fighters do it.The August fight he was offered. 3 to 4 fights a year isn't too much to ask. Its not like he took any damage from the Stipe fight and was off healing.