Err; yes he did. He must have. We are His creation remember.
God knew we would sin before he even thought about making us. (He's omniscient). Also (as he is omnipotent) he could quite simply have fixed that little bug and created us not to sin should He have so chosen.
He was well aware (before even he began making us) that we would sin, why we would sin, where it would happen, and exactly how often. He was also precisely aware of how to make us so we wouldn't (He knows everything, and can do anything).
God, in his infinite wisdom choose not to make us like that. He instead choose to make us so we could Sin (and knowing we would).
He also knew (before making us so we could go around doing all this Sinning he doesn't apparently like) that he would also 'have' to kill a whole lot of us in vengeance for a few thousand years as punishment for what we he created us to do, and that he would have to send his own Son down to earth to get tortured, and that we would go on sinning anyways.
You look at it any other way and either God didn't know we were going to Sin when he made us (hes not omniscient) or he lacked the ability to create us with the ability not to sin (he's not omnipotent).
Next time you Sin remember - God knew you were going to do it before you did it, and he made you that way.
Really, there was nothing you could have done about it at all.
I think you have a problem with understanding this
ianity. But in fact the Christian solution to this problem is better than any atheist solution could be. Atheists say that the human will is subject to the fate of environmental determinism, which is law without any sense of free will, or a product of randomness, which is freedom without law. A few atheists, like B.F. Skinner, have been courageous enough to embrace determinism; but most claim that the human will is spontaneously free. This is inconsistent with their commitment to naturalistic evolution. But whichever view the atheist holds, the human will is a product of the impersonal and amoral. There is no more moral significance to randomness than there is to materialistic determinism. Either way, the atheist view excludes the possibility of the existence of moral laws that humans have the moral freedom to obey or disobey. At least in the Christian worldview, morally responsible humans are a creation of an absolutely moral personality. There is a distinction between God’s being and man’s being, whereas the atheist denies that humans have a distinct nature from the impersonal, amoral sources
William Lane Craig answers the argument of allowance of human evil by explains that if God made us so we cannot sin and live perfectly it is 'free will rape'. I mean let's take it into perspective. If you had an undying love for let's say another human, would you like that person to love you back for who you are out of his/her own free will? Surely you would, because then the
Love wouldn't be genuine. The God you're talking about wants us to love him GENUINELY, not forcefully. According to the bible we show our love for him by repenting of sin that yes he knows we are going to commit, but also knows we are going to repent, or at least this is want he wants, isn't it?
You're also looking at this one sidedly, because God know that we CAN ignore sinful temptations just as much as we can commit sins, and knows that at times we will be good and when and where we will be good.