- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #351
-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Religion The God Question - part 2
- Thread starter Total Power
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Thread starter
- #352
So god is not complex?
bad setanta
Club Legend
- Oct 10, 2011
- 2,054
- 1,556
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #353
What it is, is a convoluted mess.
For a bloke who argues there is no God, he sure seems to know alot about God.
That's a good thing is it not? How else does he come to the conclusions without pondering over the data.
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #354
Maybe by not prattling over nothing....He's a biologist mate, not a theologian or a philosopher.....Which is painfully & excruciatingly obvious.
- Thread starter
- #355
You seem to know more than him when it comes to evolution as well, if there anything he knows more than you do? i doubt it
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #356
You seem to know more than him when it comes to evolution as well, if there anything he knows more than you do? i doubt it
I merely ask questions TP....He's the one claiming to be the expert with all the answers.
- Thread starter
- #357
He never claims to be an expert in god matters, the only anti-god book he wrote was the god delusion. Its a matter of opinion, evolution is not. Evolution fit the criteria of a scientific theory.
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #358
bad setanta
Club Legend
- Oct 10, 2011
- 2,054
- 1,556
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #359
But he was talking from a Biology point of view about complexity, he's saying something would be required to explain the complexity of God and God would be questioning that himself, not an outrageous statement by any means. That's my take anyway.
- Thread starter
- #360
Sure made alot of dough out of a book about nothing then.
Why do creationists feel the need to comment on science then? you can question evolution (despite dawkins being an expert on evolution) but the moment dawkins questionns philosophy, then "omfg what a m0ron" lol.. seriously, if you cant see the hypocrisy in that, then you never will
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #361
I'm not a creationist or a Christian....Merely asking questions.
This whole 'taking-sides' nonsense is frankly quite boring.
He slips from biology & Evolutionary theory into metaphysical speculation, that's why. And he is paid to speak as an 'expert' in his field.....Maybe he should stick to it.
- Thread starter
- #362
Why cant someone ask the question? are you not allowed to question or comment on anything outside your field? that will make every creationist hypothesis useless. Maybe you should take your own advice and stop commenting on evolution, cause you dont even know what makes a "specie"
see the similarity?
bad setanta
Club Legend
- Oct 10, 2011
- 2,054
- 1,556
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #363
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
- Thread starter
- #364
So how did humans come into existence, according to you?
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #365
I Don't know....No one does.
- Thread starter
- #366
Thats a first
bad setanta
Club Legend
- Oct 10, 2011
- 2,054
- 1,556
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #367
He's a science rockstar he can handle it, it's like Vince Neil, he gets 6 blowjobs a night backstage and it's not a stretch for him he can handle it. It's part of the job.
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #368
That's a first
Nah, it's not....Only the Gods know.
If nothing else Setanta, at least you've got a sense of humor.
....There's probably a handful of acolytes on this board, ready to get in that line I'd say.
Yes 'we' do.
We evolved from apes.
Why is that so difficult for Christians like yourself?
And yes you are not philosopher you are a christian.
Your 'monkey' statements in the evolution thread make that plain and simple,much like your approach to the physical sciences.
rugmop
Senior List
If six blowjobs doesn't cause a 'stretch' I don't know what would. That he sees the need to 'handle it' after all those ministrations suggests a lack of quality among the six oral stimulators. All of these jobs you've got happening is slightly confusing. This accords with my experience of these activities.
- Thread starter
- #371
The problem i have with believers is they attack Dawkins for not being a cosmologist and comment on cosmology. If anyone read the evolution thread this is absolutely clear, my ole mate has no idea about evolution. Neanderthals were considered sub-human species and categeoried under the scientific name of "homo" cause they were very close to humans, but here he is making statements like neanderthals are closer to monkeys, and 2 species cant mate and produce fertile offsprings. I would argue that dawkins knows much much much more about cosmology than believers know anything about science. So if they wouldnt want dawkins to comment on cosmology, they should refrain from commenting anything about science cause now i am going to start charging money for educating them
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #372
The problem i have with believers is they attack Dawkins for not being a cosmologist and comment on cosmology. If anyone read the evolution thread this is absolutely clear, my ole mate has no idea about evolution. Neanderthals were considered sub-human species and categeoried under the scientific name of "homo" cause they were very close to humans, but here he is making statements like neanderthals are closer to monkeys, and 2 species cant mate and produce fertile offsprings. I would argue that dawkins knows much much much more about cosmology than believers know anything about science. So if they wouldnt want dawkins to comment on cosmology, they should refrain from commenting anything about science cause now i am going to start charging money for educating them
LOL....Take your hubris back to the evolution thread, where it belongs knave.
- Thread starter
- #373
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #374
Its related ole mate
This is the God thread....Though it's become painfully clear 'the dork'' is the 'anointed one'.
Looks like atheists can't 'do without' after all.
- Thread starter
- #375
Lets label this as |fiction| and then we can all get along. Deal?
Similar threads
- Locked
