I beg to differ. Big time. How is Genesis compatible with evolution? If you take Genesis as a literal account, it simply cannot be. Unless, of course, you dismiss science altogether, in which case you'll just deny that evolution is even real. Do you deny evolution, or accept it and believe that, along with anything else that science discovers, is just uncovering more of God's own work?
I'll give you an example of how I think the Bible's interpretation has, and will continue to change over the course of the next few decades. I'm not sure of your views on the Intelligent Design pseudoscience, but I believe that the I.D. movement is as a direct result of evolution and advancement of scientific discoveries in general.
Now, not that the I.D. community has directly stated which God it is that has been attributed to intelligently designing the universe, the general consensus has been that it's the Christian God. This assertion is strengthened by the fact that most of I.D.'s proponents are from the Christian faith.
Many Christian institutions are against Intelligent Design. Fundamentalist Christians especially, they beleive that I.D. devalues God's work and "reduces God to an engineer". So, as a direct result of science, there's a division in how the Bible should be interpreted to the point that Creation Research Institutes are developing pseudoscience hypotheses to both fit in to current scientific knowledge while thwarting the further advancement of said knowledge.
As much as you think that you can hang on to a nearly 2,000 year old book, you can't. Its age works against it, not for it. The God-of-the-Gaps is closing. Not in our lifetime, but at some time in the future, if Donald hasn't "accidentally" hit the big red button and set off the nukes, humans will almost completely disprove the Bible. Your Bible simply cannot keep up with the ever-present reality of knowledge and reason.