The HAL Hunter thread: Updated 10/2 - Must pay some costs. Now likely to sue, lodgement likely May.
- Thread starter Armchair Critic
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Tell me who has the criminal conviction?
As far as i know it's only the club.
As you said, "out with the crooks"
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #1,104
How was he acting on his own. 34 players agreed to the program. Robinson also was involved. Hird , Thompson, Reid , knew of the program . Hird was involved in the setting up of the program and was also at the meeting where the program was discussed with the players.
Evans and Hird attended a presentation on AOD9604. It was a club endorsed program. Who paid the bills for all the injections.?
Hey, i didn't make the statement, you did, the only convicted "crook" in the club, is the club it's self.
You said "out with the crooks", so the only "crook" to go, must be the club?
TheArchivist
Debutant
- Nov 18, 2014
- 108
- 199
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Wasn't the club's values 'Whatever it Takes'? Employ whoever, do whatever, including whatever it takes to keep the damn thing quiet?
Red n Black mirth arrives at the HTB......hootie hooooo
- Jan 16, 2016
- 4,275
- 9,068
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
DANK = ESSENDON
Muggs
Premiership Player
No it does not, it means EFC failed to supervise him and control him. My employer is still responsible for my actions even if I disobey them. They may be be able to sue me for any losses they suffer through my actions but they are responsible in the first instance.
Last edited:
Muggs
Premiership Player
When did Dank actually work for Melbourne?
Im not saying Essendon arent responsible, Im saying Danks actions do not represent Essendons values
he worked with a Melbourne employee, and I cant imagine it was for free
Haha, yeah right, values?
Ask Hal to pay costs, then nek minnut, when they find out he will appear on 4 corners, all of a sudden more documents show up.
Seems coincidence=essendon.
Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 97,292
- 235,241
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #1,114
Someone post the "dig up" JPEG.
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #1,116
So by that logic Charter was Essendon , ALAVI was Essendon.
I think the BigFooty quota was used in the Bruce Francis thread.
Any leftovers shirley belong with mxett and his stirling performance this arvo though
Muggs
Premiership Player
Umm that's not what you said,
Free work happens all the time in consultancy/business , you build a relationship with someone or a organisation and try to turn that into either a job or a contract. Give people a taste of what you can do for a bit than use that to leverage for more. Dank did apply for a job at Melbourne and got his job at EFC through advising the weapon when he started, which turned into a job for Dank. Thus Dank has form in doing this.
Have you seen what they handed over?
And mxett, i have thought about it, for more than a minute, how the efc has so far treated a player that was 18 at the time, is shameful.
you can see now why they are labelled "crooks"
the age reported the documents as texts and blood test records. I can see no reason why the club would withhold these from Hal, can you? Texts sound like documents that would come from the investigation, not the club. His blood test result could have been accessed by his family doctor with only a phone call
A phone call to who?
Which pathology company had the information?
- Jan 16, 2016
- 4,275
- 9,068
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
No, we sacked our Dr Bate as soon as the club got wind of his association with Dank.
What did EFC do, give the Dr Reid a life membership.
Do you see the difference.
Wasn't it also reported, that the efc said they had no more to give Hal?
Then nek minnut, as we find out Hal will be on four corners, they find more.
Damn the efc are unlucky with all these coincidences.
- Status
