Of course it will come off at times, Warner has amazing hand-eye, as does Johnson. My point is, can you rely on him for a long series against Dale Steyn and Vernon Philander swinging it a mile? It's all well and good to score runs when the opposition are making <200 runs in each innings, and Warner's doing exactly what he needs to here, but in a hard fought series (which this hasn't been), will he stand up?
Warner is one of those guys whose numbers will always stack up because he will score heavily in the right circumstances which will occur regularly enough.
The question is whether he makes important runs or whether he makes flat track runs and/or runs against shit attacks which is something that you can only really determine after he's played enough games that it wont matter. It is cricket self-fulfilling prophecy which is how most players have made their careers (as long as you're one of the boys).
Frustrating thing is that he's done nothing in the first innings so far and piled on the runs in the second innings. First test was a good innings because there was pressure to perform. Second innings in Adelaide basically counts for nothing.
