An average attitude IMO, but I've already said I won't continue on, so you're kinda just yelling at the mirror here.
A lot of misnomers about Ratts in this thread, but it's your board, so you can pretend you're right if you want.
Good luck for the last round of the season guys. Sorry if my posting has perturbed some of you for whatever reason.
Sorry, what misnomers?
Carlton sacked him because they didn't think he was good enough. Your opinion is that he is not good enough for you, but good enough for us. Why's that? Because we're a "feeder club"? What a load of wank. Leave the arrogance back at your own board if you want to add your two cents.
The reason why we'd prefer Eade is that he has been in this situation before, rebuilt the Dog's to an inch of multiple Grand Final appearances, has experience at a "poor" club

, has that kind of aura that makes players think twice about bullshitting him and is currently a senior strategist at a top four club.
The reason we'd prefer Burns is that he is at a club that languished around the bottom of the ladder for about three years and took them to the top four and has the players playing an extremely effective game plan in one season. Trusted, respected by one of the best coaches in the AFL and is still young enough to bring fresh ideas into the place.
The reason why we're sceptical on Ratten is that it is a pretty widely held view that Carlton's improvement has been based upon the addition of Judd and three consecutive number one draft picks. His tactical nous has been called into question several times and has won the grand total of one final.
Not against bringing Ratten in for an assitant role, or even interviewing him and putting him on the shortlist. But FFS it's incredibly arrogant to start spruiking how we would be a pathetic club if we didn't immediately pick up another teams "slops".