Dannnnnnnnnn
Moderator
- Aug 24, 2012
- 37,303
- 53,461
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- T'Wolves/Patrick Beverley/Footscray
- Moderator
- #1
I would suggest that my views on Jack Redpath are well known around here. In short, I am not a fan. However, it's becoming harder for me to deny that in our current formation and list structure, we more often than not play better with Redpath in the team.
It's an interesting phenomenon. Watching the game yesterday, he didn't impact in a big way, and honestly he rarely does - particularly when things aren't going our way. But I genuinely believe our overall structure, decision making and ball use tend to display an upswing when Red is in the team.
The best way I can explain this is by suggesting that he is predictable. So, so, so predictable. He will lead aggressively down the corridor almost like clockwork. If he doesn't get the ball he will double back and either diverge from the midline at an acute angle, or will continue along the same path. Regardless, he forms an easy path to read and, more importantly, predict.
The effect of such leads (beyond providing an easy target if successful) is that they open up space behind him. The players know exactly where that space will be every time because of how predictable he is. Thus the player with ball in hand knows to look behind him, and the other forwards around him know exactly where the space will open up. When teams account for this and go narrow, we're still caught out occasionally, but are improving at quickly switching and having somebody like Dunkley or Gowers provide an option hard against the boundary.
With such a haphazard selection of midfielders and defenders and ruckmen up forward, we lack the forward nous that makes the offensive schemes of most sides look systematic and well-coordinated. Players aren't experienced in knowing where to run and how to create goals, so the predictability is vital. It simplifies the game and the role for them and makes them more threatening as a result.
I agree with the sentiment of some that we need to move past him to truly make a big impact on the competition. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think we need to find one or two more well-rounded key forwards to truly flourish. As it stands right now though, Jack Redpath's contribution to the team far exceeds his direct impact on games to a degree that, in my opinion, outweighs that of the key forward versions of Jordan Roughead, Tom Boyd, Jackson Trengove or Josh Schache.
Note: I fully reserve the right to call for Redpath's head in a fit of rage after he offers nothing next week
It's an interesting phenomenon. Watching the game yesterday, he didn't impact in a big way, and honestly he rarely does - particularly when things aren't going our way. But I genuinely believe our overall structure, decision making and ball use tend to display an upswing when Red is in the team.
The best way I can explain this is by suggesting that he is predictable. So, so, so predictable. He will lead aggressively down the corridor almost like clockwork. If he doesn't get the ball he will double back and either diverge from the midline at an acute angle, or will continue along the same path. Regardless, he forms an easy path to read and, more importantly, predict.
The effect of such leads (beyond providing an easy target if successful) is that they open up space behind him. The players know exactly where that space will be every time because of how predictable he is. Thus the player with ball in hand knows to look behind him, and the other forwards around him know exactly where the space will open up. When teams account for this and go narrow, we're still caught out occasionally, but are improving at quickly switching and having somebody like Dunkley or Gowers provide an option hard against the boundary.
With such a haphazard selection of midfielders and defenders and ruckmen up forward, we lack the forward nous that makes the offensive schemes of most sides look systematic and well-coordinated. Players aren't experienced in knowing where to run and how to create goals, so the predictability is vital. It simplifies the game and the role for them and makes them more threatening as a result.
I agree with the sentiment of some that we need to move past him to truly make a big impact on the competition. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think we need to find one or two more well-rounded key forwards to truly flourish. As it stands right now though, Jack Redpath's contribution to the team far exceeds his direct impact on games to a degree that, in my opinion, outweighs that of the key forward versions of Jordan Roughead, Tom Boyd, Jackson Trengove or Josh Schache.
Note: I fully reserve the right to call for Redpath's head in a fit of rage after he offers nothing next week