- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Posts
- 1,432
- Reaction score
- 7
- Location
- Brisbane
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Rabbitohs,Wallabies.
Malibu#27 said:I'm not sure what port people would think - I haven't asked, but another way to attack the father son in this state would be:
Port - gets sons of all Port magpies having played 100 games (in line with Vic clubs) with similar cut of dates (i.e played 100 games prior to 97) - no cutoff for when the player has to be drafted.
Adelaide gets all other clubs players with 200 qualification. No cutoff for when they have to be drafted, but must have played the 200 prior to 91.
Reason I was thinking this way, is due to occassion that Ross Gibbs complained and had Glenelg aligned to AFC instead of PAFC. Would father sons from other non-Port Magpie clubs want their father son selections going to Port or Adelaide.... and more precisely what relationship does say WestAdelaide have with Port Adelaide.
Would this work or would the AFL then increase the number of games played to qualify for AFC.
Being a died in the wool Westies man and having an absolute hatred of all things Port, I like your thinking, it kills me to think of sons of Westies playing for the Power.






