Sounds like we may see some bombing it long into the forward line. If it Young, Ryan and Hill doing the bombing I'll be happy.west
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like we may see some bombing it long into the forward line. If it Young, Ryan and Hill doing the bombing I'll be happy.west
Exactly and now we have Lobb joining Hogan and Tabs down forward. 3 good contested marks could be a huge positive for usSounds like we may see some bombing it long into the forward line. If it Young, Ryan and Hill doing the bombing I'll be happy.
Exactly and now we have Lobb joining Hogan and Tabs down forward. 3 good contested marks could be a huge positive for us
Can you imagine how he would be treated if he played for any Vic team.
Port have been playing 3 talls, hasn't hindered them.It's a bit of a risk though.
Adelaide have played 3 talls, and it's hurt them given the inability of those talls to work together (allowing defenders like Andrews to leave their man and impact other marking contests) and the inability of the team to apply pressure I50.
Further to that when we add the medium sized Sturt to the team, and consider that we'll be playing Fyfe forward a lot when he returns, and there's a decent possibility we're going to be way too tall up forward and we'll have to make a hard call to drop someone.
Port have been playing 3 talls, hasn't hindered them.
Brisbane have as well with (Big O, Hipwood and Mcstay).
GWS often have 3 talls.
It can be done, just got to get the right mix of smalls. Matera, Colyer and Schultz and our midfield haven't exactly been applying the best pressure.
If the other "big 2 of the 3" I agree that Dusty has been in much worse form than Nat, but the Bont has been very good, after a slow start.I see it as the Vic Media prefer bikies over truckies.
Give me a truckie any day.
On a serious note, I’m confused why they’re lining up Fyfe. The first 2 games back after the break, he was in pretty good form. The other 2 players of the “top 3 AFL players”, are in very ordinary form. Why target the Lake Grace Legend ?.
I see it as the Vic Media prefer bikies over truckies.
Give me a truckie any day.
On a serious note, I’m confused why they’re lining up Fyfe. The first 2 games back after the break, he was in pretty good form. The other 2 players of the “top 3 AFL players”, are in very ordinary form. Why target the Lake Grace Legend ?.
If the other "big 2 of the 3" I agree that Dusty has been in much worse form than Nat, but the Bont has been very good, after a slow start.
On CPH1920 using BigFooty.com mobile app
He is a clean cut straight down the middle. All round nice guy.Fair point about Bont, but I had included the surfer from down Geeeelong way.
Oh well I think Fyfe has big shoulders, he’ll let it drip off him and keep going forward.
Still confused why the media have taken aim at him. Obviously run out of druggy, drunks, and footy Covid stories.
The Fyfe bashing has always felt like salt to me. Which is strange because Pav always got the love.
The Fyfe bashing is 100% salt, but I can see why he gets it and not Pav, Fyfe holds himself with that sort of swagger that haters accuse as arrogance.
SorryFair point about Bont, but I had included the surfer from down Geeeelong way.
Oh well I think Fyfe has big shoulders, he’ll let it drip off him and keep going forward.
Still confused why the media have taken aim at him. Obviously run out of druggy, drunks, and footy Covid stories.
Sunday media
Yes we willIt shits me how much the Melbourne based media has quoted “No Fyfe no Fremantle” this week.
I guess we’ll find out today