Yes, you do. Thought it was pretty clear:
The whole premise of this thread is based around the idea that Priddis does more harm than good by being in the side. Surely any rational discussion around this should include all facets of his game, good and bad. When the claim has constantly been made that Matt is a liability kicking inside 50 and he bucks that trend, that's a useful data point? Sure, it might turn out to be an isolated incident but you can't just ignore it or claim that it's irrelevant when the debate centers on the exact topic of whether Priddis has any ability to help us win games.
TBH I kind of agree with GIFMaker that you've put up a straw man here, arguing that those plays don't matter because Priddis won't win us a flag (which no one actually said he would) is just a way of ignoring the fact that Priddis played decently in that game. Would it have been that hard to just say, "yes, he played decently, but I would have expected that and he would have to show that form against tougher opposition before changing my opinion" instead of reverting to name calling ("arsehat"?). Have you ever managed to successfully sway someone's opinion by insulting them?
On your last point, I couldn't care less. He was trolling.
On your more substantive point, it's also been the subject of the thread that Matt isn't without positive traits. He obviously is, including the ability to occasionally execute a skill at the level of a solidly talented schoolboy footballer.
But as you allude, to solely focus on his few positive points from a game is to risk overstating his import. He was ok, sort of, after half time when the floodgates opened and the pressure fell away completely by them. Given that context his disposals while neat and productive were only semi-useful in the same way Butlers late goal the week before was. It was an asterisk rather than the main sentence.
This week everything about the main sentence, the story of the game, revolved around what Priddis didn't do and what others did in his place. His game was adequate, it was ok, it was no more than that. Importantly, when others took his main role we looked sharper, quicker, more damaging and we pressured better...
Which seems significant since that's the main theme of this thread...
And some arsehats want to focus on a couple of context less GIF'S
