Your view is so diametrically opposed to that of Simpson, the club's coaching staff and the coaching fraternity in general that it's impossible to make any inference other than that you're saying they're all wrong and you're right.
But if you're saying you don't know better than them, how can you be right and they're wrong?
My view is what I see unfold on the screen.
Even the most ardent priddis supporter agrees his disposal is poor.
It is a lost argument when you dismiss what takes place in front of your eyes and you defer to the coaches etc.
Obviously I don't have any most here including you don't have coaching experience. But to say I am wrong because I am not a coach or part of the fraternity works both ways when you say a player is playing well.
Many here think that bennell was hard done by being dropped, are they wrong and Simpson wrong?
Many say that msginnity should not have been played, are they wrong g because Simpson was playing him?
Clearly you can see his disposal is poor by foot and agree he has limitations with speed etc so Simpson playing him is not a validation or acceptance of those limitations is it?
Maybe he rates his other strengths enough to keep him in the side, maybe he can't drop him as he has been instructed by higher up. What is clear is that even you scratch your head when he has got coaches votes when he wasn't bog or even close to it, most of us do. We don't have all the facts except what we are told and what we see.
But to say I am wrong because I am not a coach is simplistic bullshit.
Am I wrong about my political views because I am not prime minister?
Am i wrong about my opinion on indiginous Australians issues because I am not an aboriginal elder?
Am I wrong about coca cola because I am not CEO of coca cola?