Opinion The new Polec trade thread (deal done!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

port_adelaide_1870

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Posts
9,556
Likes
13,653
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Why should we give up pick 14 for a player who isn't even AFL proven (And in all rights could turn into a complete dud.)

Losing pick 14 for pick 20 and 27 would be very disappointing and unfortunately its really the only ways which would see us land Polec... This years draft is going to suck.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PAFCsince1870

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Posts
3,312
Likes
2,397
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Orlando Magic
Who is to say pick 14 won't just be another Ben Jacobs though? It's hardly a Wines or Wingard caliber type pick.

Seems logical to me to take the guy that grew up supporting Port and has nominated us as his club of preference as opposed to an 18 year old that we hope buys in to Port Adelaide.
 

Hong-Kong Phooey

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Posts
6,876
Likes
6,596
Location
i have no idea
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Man United
Why should we give up pick 14 for a player who isn't even AFL proven (And in all rights could turn into a complete dud.)

Losing pick 14 for pick 20 and 27 would be very disappointing and unfortunately its really the only ways which would see us land Polec... This years draft is going to suck.
He is better than a pick 14
 

tribey

5 Wins In-A-Row Certificate Recipients '13/'14/'18
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Posts
56,093
Likes
119,574
Location
Queen St & Peter Rd
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
NUFC, YES.
Yeah I wouldn't expect many to agree with me. In 2 years Jacobs had played 26 games and averaged ~16 disposals and kicked a few goals to boot. In 3 years Polec has played 16 games averaging ~12 disposals and kicking a few more goals. The stunning stat though is the 1%'s. So yeah, different players and all but in their respective positions I feel Jacobs had shown more. He really went to shit at North though.
Jacobs was a junior bully who couldn't step up. Have never seen a player with such vaunted disposal find a way to pick out an opponent completely in the clear.

Is still able to find it because of his big tank and ability to drift into space like Michael Barlow, but is as soft and ineffective as a certain past recruit from Hawthorn.

Polec has genuine weaponry who is yet to have a breakout year due to the wasteland up in Brisbane.
 

noot

Team Captain
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
427
Likes
159
Location
south of south
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
i-fish
Who is to say pick 14 won't just be another Ben Jacobs though? It's hardly a Wines or Wingard caliber type pick.

Seems logical to me to take the guy that grew up supporting Port and has nominated us as his club of preference as opposed to an 18 year old that we hope buys in to Port Adelaide.

very persuasive :thumbsu:
 

tribey

5 Wins In-A-Row Certificate Recipients '13/'14/'18
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Posts
56,093
Likes
119,574
Location
Queen St & Peter Rd
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
NUFC, YES.
right now he is obviously because we are yet too know who pick 14 will be...

Will be a disaster if we do this deal and in the end Polec doesn't amass to anything and the pick 14 becomes an absolute champion.
Pick 31 could be a champion. Pick 55 could be a champion.

It's a random hand. Polec is better than #14, but is situational overs given Brisbane are over a barrel. If we have to downgrade the pick itself as is being suggested I'm fine with that. It's not as if we'd be cashing in our golden ticket in the Boyd-Aish stakes.
 

Noobz0r

Tom Jonas Fan Club Junior VP
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Posts
24,921
Likes
29,709
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
KDFC, SDFC, MUFC, Pats
Why should we give up pick 14 for a player who isn't even AFL proven (And in all rights could turn into a complete dud.)
Won't the unproven pick 14 have a similar chance of being a dud? Polec as a potential player would be better than a pick 14. His situational worth is different though.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

port_adelaide_1870

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Posts
9,556
Likes
13,653
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Won't the unproven pick 14 have a similar chance of being a dud? Polec as a potential player would be better than a pick 14. His situational worth is different though.
yes of course he has but pick 13 has not been on an AFL list for 3 years and couldn't get a regular spot in the best 22.

If Polec reaches his potential and becomes a star we will be all laughing and saying what a steal... But there is always a chance he won't. Thus my concern for trading away pick 14 and having our first pick at 27.
 
Joined
May 27, 2004
Posts
21,884
Likes
32,944
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Moderator #1,688
I'm not denying that Jacobs was statistically better than Polec. But in terms of talent and potential shown, Polec is miles ahead IMO. Obviously that's just my opinion based on intangibles, but I think most people who saw a lot of the two players would agree.

No he didn't. He's the same player at North that he was here, we're just not watching him with rose-coloured glasses anymore.
Jacobs was a junior bully who couldn't step up. Have never seen a player with such vaunted disposal find a way to pick out an opponent completely in the clear.

Is still able to find it because of his big tank and ability to drift into space like Michael Barlow, but is as soft and ineffective as a certain past recruit from Hawthorn.

Polec has genuine weaponry who is yet to have a breakout year due to the wasteland up in Brisbane.
No doubt Polec has talent and potential and is miles ahead of Jacobs in that sense. That's what we're trading on as we certainly are not trading on output. We're speculating that Polec's ceiling is as high as his draft pick suggests it should be and can be harnessed. If we're parting with our first round pick as rumored, it hints that yes, we believe Brisbane totally cocked up his development.
 

tribey

5 Wins In-A-Row Certificate Recipients '13/'14/'18
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Posts
56,093
Likes
119,574
Location
Queen St & Peter Rd
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
NUFC, YES.
Struggles to get a game in a team that finished behind us.
If he is worth 14 than we have players that struggle to make our side that should be worth top 10 easy if you agree with Polec's worth is 14.
If Wingard had've had an injury-interrupted season this year and as a result struggled for form in a Port side still tracking circa 2012 he wouldn't be worth downgrading pick #14?

Polec isn't some schlub being shopped around like say, Jarryd Lyons, he's an elite talent who will flourish in a real football environment - Brisbane have been a joke for a decade.
 

Powerade 08

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Posts
10,399
Likes
7,410
Location
adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Polec is better than #14
Polec has had a 3 year head start and it still looks pretty even to me.

Tears it up like Thompson and whoever we get wants back to Victoria after three crap years like Jacobs.
Thompson is a juiced up to his eyeballs tough inside player, Polec is more like Cale Morton without the work ethic.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Posts
2,207
Likes
3,243
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
If we get 21 and 22 for 14 (from GWS), the offer is 22.
If we get 20 and 27 for 14 (from GC), the offer is 27.
If we get 18 and 25 for 14 (from Saints) the offer is 25.

In all those scenarios we've ensured we have a pick above the Crows, so the "let him go to the draft" option works for us (yeah we'll have to pay slight overs of 18/20/21, but we will still have the latter 22/25/27 pick anyway).

We'll be back in the power position, and we give Brisbane the choice of a mid 20s pick (consensus worth of Polec) or nothing. IMO if we end up without a pick before Adelaide post trade week, we've played it badly.

The other option is that Brisbane somehow get a hold of an 18-22 pick through the Longer/Yeo trade, and in that case we could do 14 for Polec and that pick. Brisbane may prefer this option because it nets them another 1st rounder, but the onus is on them to get the appropriate pick (I think late 20s wouldn't be enough for us- again, the Crows 23 pick is the arbitary/symbolic guideline).
 

240volt

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
6,351
Likes
3,809
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
If Wingard had've had an injury-interrupted season this year and as a result struggled for form in a Port side still tracking circa 2012 he wouldn't be worth downgrading pick #14?

Polec isn't some schlub being shopped around like say, Jarryd Lyons, he's an elite talent who will flourish in a real football environment - Brisbane have been a joke for a decade.
I see what your saying but i just don't believe he is worth anymore than a second round pick on what he has shown at Brisbane in 3 years.
The club has done well of late with there choices so i would go along with whatever they decide.
 

n4nirvana

Club Legend
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Posts
1,882
Likes
1,617
Location
Adelaide/Melbourne
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
If we get 21 and 22 for 14 (from GWS), the offer is 22.
If we get 20 and 27 for 14 (from GC), the offer is 27.
If we get 18 and 25 for 14 (from Saints) the offer is 25.

If the Gold coast one is true
ideal scenario then would be Lions to accept 27

but like i queried about Thring and Rucci - is that 1 (thring piggybacking Ruc) or 2 sources suggesting the same deal. if it is 2 sources then that has greater weight meaning we are giving up 20 instead
 

Us against the rest

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Posts
9,276
Likes
8,305
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Pick 31 could be a champion. Pick 55 could be a champion.

It's a random hand. Polec is better than #14, but is situational overs given Brisbane are over a barrel. If we have to downgrade the pick itself as is being suggested I'm fine with that. It's not as if we'd be cashing in our golden ticket in the Boyd-Aish stakes.
Being an SA boy could make all the difference. He would come home and want to prove his worth imo.
 

Us against the rest

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Posts
9,276
Likes
8,305
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
I see what your saying but i just don't believe he is worth anymore than a second round pick on what he has shown at Brisbane in 3 years.
The club has done well of late with there choices so i would go along with whatever they decide.
Wingard will develop into a great player, but if we had to make a call on his finals games he would be judged as very average but we all know he's a gun. I say let's give Polec the chance to prove he can really play the game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom