Caro mentioned out clauses. It's not beyond the realms of possibility.The out clause is just a BF rumour anyway.
The hard one is: does he want to come? Have we pitched an attractive enough offer? This is the primary obstacle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Caro mentioned out clauses. It's not beyond the realms of possibility.The out clause is just a BF rumour anyway.
I don't beleive he has any out clause.
I also think the Hawks will want some form of compensation to release him.
And yes I do expect him to stay if they say no as his reputation is far more important.
so how would you know this?
so how would you know this?
Thats if you choose to believe that. I believe we have someone already. Monday cannot come soon enough.
Caro mentioned out clauses. It's not beyond the realms of possibility.
The hard one is: does he want to come? Have we pitched an attractive enough offer? This is the primary obstacle.
Won't happen Monday Clarko will still be pissed.......celebrating or drowning sorrows!
how do you know he has?
#circleWork.
Tried to stay silent, but can't anymore.
All contracts would have a break clause for the coach, it can't be a one way Street.
I suspect most contracts have a clause whereby the coach pays out the rest of his own contract to leave. Employment contracts I have been on have had a similar clause.
It is possible that a club could offer to pay this, if they are desperate enough.
Imagine it has been done in another sport at sometime.
No it's just Clarko's philosophy. "One soldier goes down, one comes in". Meaning the systems are setup so it's not heavily personnel based or reliant. It's been applied to all areas of Hawthorn.Heard an interesting snippet from the Hawks Chairman at their GF lunch today - he was giving the footy dept a huge wrap for what they have achieved this year given all of the difficult circumstances ie injury and Clarko's illness. Fair enough
What was interesting was he went on to say that the footy dept was set up so that anyone was replaceable because of the program/system in place, which was shown during Clarko's absence.
Prob reading too much into it but sounded like the beginnings of managing a departure.
I'm going with that anyway
Didnt MM had a contact with the Pies which he broke, but had to sit out a year?
Do posters on here ever call 5AA up?
Really? A clause where the coach pays his salary back to the club? Surely not, that's stacked way too far in favour of the club. Surely it would just be the the Coach foregoes the salary they would have made (i.e. stop being paid by the club), and cease coaching.
Was that a part of that weird succession plan contract, which lead to Buckley taking over? I was under the impression that Malthouse was supposed to become a mentor or "director of coaching" or something like that when Buckley took over, but didn't like the idea when it actually came to doing it and decided to step away.
Unders. We'd want The Big Show tooPick 9 for Clarko + Aaron Finch
Pick 9 for Clarko + Aaron Finch