The Non-Essendon Thread

[Kong]

Re: Dan Hannebury

Also, you do realise that we are not the club?

That our expectations, our reactions, reflect the supporter base of the club - at least the online portion - not the actual club itself?

I think some people forget that sometimes, even with the Reimers thread on the Collingwood board.

 

[Jesse Custer]

Re: Adam Goodes - What a Champion

lol Kelvin.

 

[Kyptastic]

Re: Adam Goodes - What a Champion

Fill in the gaps:

_ _ _ _ thread is _ _ _ _

 

[Ben the Gooner]

Bastard cost me a shit ton of SC points by missing that last shot.

 

[Dreambomber]

Re: Dan Hannebury

**** me.. I'm almost done with this board.

Praising other teams players.. heard it all now.

Good riddance

 

[yaco55]

Re: Dan Hannebury

Great effort. But what he did is basically standard procedure. Only a select few players can't do things like that. Example, an ex Bomber playing at Tigerland.

This shows your ignorance.

Houli's issue is consistently is with front on contact - hence his loopy handballs - Surprisingly backing into packs is the least of his issues.

 

[yaco55]

The most pleasing feature of the Hurley/Hannaberry clash was that to my eyes - When Hurley saw Hannaberry enter his path - Hurley went harder at the ball.

 

[Kong]

Re: Dan Hannebury

Houli's issue is consistently is with front on contact - hence his loopy handballs - Surprisingly backing into packs is the least of his issues.

I don't understand this sentence.

 

[yaco55]

Re: Dan Hannebury

I don't understand this sentence.

Poster was referring to Houli - that he would never back into a pack - He has done this many times.

Houli's issue is with front on contact - both the consistency of attacking the ball at 100% and sometimes flinching ( when he has the ball ) is about to receive body contact and at times giving those INFAMOUS loopy handballs.

 

[DaSawx]

Bastard cost me a shit ton of SC points by missing that last shot.

Yeah ditto, lost my league game by 16 points

 

[SirJimi05]

Re: Dan Hannebury

I don't understand this sentence.

I do and it is actually a very insightful pickup on his behalf.

Agree with it 100%.

 

[SirJimi05]

The most pleasing feature of the Hurley/Hannaberry clash was that to my eyes - When Hurley saw Hannaberry enter his path - Hurley went harder at the ball.

And when he looked down to make sure he had hurt his opponent. I loved that.

 

[Kong]

Re: Dan Hannebury

I do and it is actually a very insightful pickup on his behalf.

Agree with it 100%.

Fair enough, I'm glad you did.

 

[SirJimi05]

Yeah, haven't you noticed this with Houli? He often shows courage backing back or putting himself under a high ball. Often showed this at Essendonn and has done it on plenty of occasions this season for the Tiges.

It's front on where he seems to go to water a bit.

 

[Jesse Custer]

Point taken Yaco. Thank you.

 

[Kong]

Yeah, haven't you noticed this with Houli? He often shows courage backing back or putting himself under a high ball. Often showed this at Essendonn and has done it on plenty of occasions this season for the Tiges.

It's front on where he seems to go to water a bit.

Yeah I agree with that, I just didnt understand what yaco was saying.

 

[Tassieboy]

Re: Dan Hannebury

Good riddance

Bahahaha.

 

[SirJimi05]

Yeah I agree with that, I just didnt understand what yaco was saying.

Ahh ok, I didn't understand what you didn't understand...

 

[Kong]

Rinse and repeat?

 

[DaSawx]

Why is it that pathetic, inept clubs like Carlton receive hand-outs to pay their mercenaries while we get nadda just for being a well run club.

 

[Kong]

Yeah it doesn't seem right that they're allowed to spend so much on one player when their club's $6M in debt.

 

[Burzum]

Carlton still haven't had to pay their $900k fine.

 

[Kong]

Fine for what?

 

[Phone]

Carlton still haven't had to pay their $900k fine.

iirc they have but only because the afl gave a loan to them so they could pay the fine back to them

 

[Summer Nights]

Fine for what?

Brown paper bags.