Oppo Camp The Non-North FOOTY DISCUSSION ONLY & Matchday Chat Thread III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 21, 2011
8,236
21,323
Basement of the J. Edgar Hoover Building
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Manchester City, Melbourne Victory
Sadly pretty common for ladies, need to wisen up and not put themselves in such a situation.

Conversely don't share photos, it's not ****** hard lads.

Also massive lol at the US.
 
Conversely don't share photos, it's not ****** hard lads.

Also massive lol at the US.


Look, the photo was posed. Doesn't look like she was caught unaware when the camera went off.

If you're posing nude for people, you can't ever be guaranteed that it will stay between their eyes only.

Especially when it's done by a pea brained AFL footballer, after a night on the piss after a premiership.
 
Sep 4, 2014
2,806
6,203
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Golden State, SF 49ers
John Ralph was funny this morning.

Saying it was serious, the player shouldn't have done it, the law and world has changed. When asked what the maximum penalty was, he said he would find out. When KB said it was two years, he changed his tune and said "well it wont come to that, that won't happen".
 

kangaspurs

Cancelled
Jul 14, 2014
9,722
18,848
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Tottenham, Melbourne City FC
Sadly pretty common for ladies, need to wisen up and not put themselves in such a situation.

Look, the photo was posed. Doesn't look like she was caught unaware when the camera went off.

If you're posing nude for people, you can't ever be guaranteed that it will stay between their eyes only.

Especially when it's done by a pea brained AFL footballer, after a night on the piss after a premiership.
Or whoever the dude was could not send it around to his mates.

Regardless of whether she posed or not, it's her body, she is entitled to do with it what she wants. He's not entitled to treat it as a copy of Back Door Sluts 9.

I get the argument that she is naive, but that's why the revenge porn laws have been passed; to protect women in that situation, and rightfully so imo.
 
Or whoever the dude was could not send it around to his mates.

Regardless of whether she posed or not, it's her body, she is entitled to do with it what she wants. He's not entitled to treat it as a copy of Back Door Sluts 9.

I get the argument that she is naive, but that's why the revenge porn laws have been passed; to protect women in that situation, and rightfully so imo.

I thought 9 was one of the weaker instalments of that particular series. But I suppose they were never going to replicate the outstanding achievements of Back Door Sluts 4, 6 and particularly, 7. :thumbsu:
 
Aug 21, 2011
8,236
21,323
Basement of the J. Edgar Hoover Building
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Manchester City, Melbourne Victory
Or whoever the dude was could not send it around to his mates.

Regardless of whether she posed or not, it's her body, she is entitled to do with it what she wants. He's not entitled to treat it as a copy of Back Door Sluts 9.

I get the argument that she is naive, but that's why the revenge porn laws have been passed; to protect women in that situation, and rightfully so imo.

I get what numchuks is saying, that's more having street smarts, which while isn't the extent of the argument, is a point I'll acknowledge without using it as justification. Fair enough. We're more talking about the law, which is different.
 

kangaspurs

Cancelled
Jul 14, 2014
9,722
18,848
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Tottenham, Melbourne City FC
I get what numchuks is saying, that's more having street smarts, which while isn't the extent of the argument, is a point I'll acknowledge without using it as justification. Fair enough. We're more talking about the law, which is different.
Yeah I definitely get that.

But part of the point of the law is to protect girls and women in that situation. It's about changing the culture that says 'Err why didn't she expect that to get shared' to one where we respect a woman's autonomy over her own body.
 
Or whoever the dude was could not send it around to his mates.

Regardless of whether she posed or not, it's her body, she is entitled to do with it what she wants. He's not entitled to treat it as a copy of Back Door Sluts 9.

I get the argument that she is naive, but that's why the revenge porn laws have been passed; to protect women in that situation, and rightfully so imo.

Fair argument and I don't disagree with the law change.

Really important to have imo.
 
Or whoever the dude was could not send it around to his mates.

Regardless of whether she posed or not, it's her body, she is entitled to do with it what she wants. He's not entitled to treat it as a copy of Back Door Sluts 9.

I get the argument that she is naive, but that's why the revenge porn laws have been passed; to protect women in that situation, and rightfully so imo.
I thought 9 was one of the weaker instalments of that particular series. But I suppose they were never going to replicate the outstanding achievements of Back Door Sluts 4, 6 and particularly, 7. :thumbsu:
Its Back Door 9 Sluts.
Wasnt aware there was series. Just that 9 sluts were waiting for the back door
 

Le Grille

Cancelled
Veteran 10k Posts Werewolf Player SFA Good Friday Appeal North Melbourne - 2018 Luke Davies-Uniacke and Paul Ahern Player Sponsor BeanCoiNFT Investor North Melbourne - 2017 Junker and Wagner Player Sponsor Podcaster Zombie Lover A Star Wars Fan
Feb 14, 2005
21,875
39,485
AFL Club
North Melbourne
I’ve got 2 (very young) daughters so stuff like this scares the s**t out of me. I reckon parents of teenagers and young adults must stress about this stuff.

I’m glad I was an 80’s kid and didn’t have to worry about things turning up on the internet. :eek:

Yeah, I mean the intstant one to many communication is the big difference here.
 

Heaps of fun

Goatered on the sticks
Sep 13, 2013
23,853
62,248
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Saw on the drafts board that two Richmond supporters with 5000+ posts each have been banhammered and this website becomes that little bit more tolerable.
 
Apr 24, 2013
81,024
153,170
Arden Street Hill
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
Guilty plea & payout.

Posting pictures of your sexual partners with their consent is crass.

Posting pictures of your sexual partners without their consent is the act of an attention seeking crumb.
 

Coalface

Team Captain
Mar 1, 2015
417
1,561
Jakarta
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Fish Creek Football Club
I thought 9 was one of the weaker instalments of that particular series. But I suppose they were never going to replicate the outstanding achievements of Back Door Sluts 4, 6 and particularly, 7. :thumbsu:

I've only seen the 8th installment and thought it lacked closure, does Kelly finally get the sink fixed in 9?
 
And here she is:

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...nsibility-policy-exposed-20171011-gyz2no.html


AFL's clumsy efforts to rewrite its respect and responsibility policy exposed
  • Caroline Wilson

If it is true that a Richmond premiership player passed on to friends and teammates personal photographs of a semi-naked woman, then the Tigers cannot defend him. And the AFL, if required, must overrule the club and suspend him.

As damaging as this story could become for the club and as uncomfortable as it is for the image-conscious AFL, then just imagine how the young woman in question must feel. If what she has alleged took place - and certainly anyone who wants to has seen the photograph - then she has been violated and humiliated.

And you can only imagine what her parents must be going through. It was the family who took this sordid allegation to the club in a complaint that has finished up in the hands of police and again exposed the AFL's clumsy efforts to rewrite its respect and responsibility policy.

Now the woman in this case is traumatised and the AFL's role has been to reach out to support her. Richmond are silent and waiting for the results of the police investigation. Clearly this grubby story has dealt a major blow to a club that was rightly presenting as a new benchmark within the competition.

It seems frankly outrageous that anyone at Richmond could play down the allegations on the basis that the woman's face is not shown in the photograph with the premiership medal. If her accusations are confirmed then the AFL must take a stand on what amounts to "sexting'', a form of horrible social media abuse and violation and a practice that has become all too regular.


Almost eight years ago the AFL struggled with the issue when a nude photograph of Lara Bingle came to light, allegedly sent around after being taken by Brendan Fevola. To his credit, Adrian Anderson - who oversaw both football and integrity at the AFL - identified the seriousness of the allegation. This despite wide sections of the AFL community pointing the finger at Bingle's role in the affair. More recently, in 2014, Carlton did not wait for the long arm of the law to sack Josh Bootsma for a significantly more serious, sinister and systematic abuse on social media.


In a stark piece of irony, it is almost two years since another woman approached the Tigers and accused Dustin Martin of threatening her with a set of chopsticks in a Chapel Street restaurant. Martin was investigated by police, the AFL and Richmond and cleared.

Amid the confusion and lack of relevant guidelines, the AFL issued Martin with a suspended fine and president Peggy O'Neal later said the club regretted doing that deal because the player, in Richmond's view, had done nothing wrong.

By January 2016 AFL boss Gillon McLachlan said the league would review and rewrite its social policy because it was by then more than a decade old, out-dated and found wanting. Just as some protagonists in days past boasted to their mates, now they have a variety of electronic mechanisms to ensure the word is spread and widely, never mind the other party.

The Australian Human Rights commissioner, Kate Jenkins, - who had completed some effective work with the Victoria Police and the state's firefighting services - was seconded onto a high-profile working party, but the project floundered.

Passed from one AFL executive to the competition's new diversity chief Tanya Hosch, a social activist, in the second half of last year, Hosch then outsourced to the Canberra-based consultants Rapid Context. One year later, in August, after two senior married AFL executives had been sacked for having affairs with staffers, the 18 club chiefs were thoroughly sounded out for a policy overhaul over sexual abuse, harassment and discrimination.

Put through a scenario-based exercise at their annual two-day catch-up, some of the hypotheticals included "sexting''. The conversations that followed raised the complex parallel challenges thrown up when both the game and the law were investigating a complaint.

In short, 21 months have passed since McLachlan identified flaws in the AFL's respect and responsibility policy and still no modern improved replacement exists.

It is true that every case is different, but in this case the Richmond player, if guilty, should not only be fined, but suspended from the club for a period and probably for a number of games.

The AFL did not sufficiently stand up for Marc Murphy's wife during the season, putting the Jake Carlisle incident down to on-field sledging, but we suspect it will stand up now. As a self-declared community leader this presents the game with an ideal opportunity to make plain its disgust with social media abuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back