Remove this Banner Ad

The off topic thread #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jatz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So then why were you disagreeing with me? Maybe now you understand why I was confused by you disagreeing with what I said?
You're disagreeing with me! I never said taste wasn't subjective, but I said people still could have what could uniformly be perceived as good or bad taste. That's when you came in and disagreed
 
You're disagreeing with me! I never said taste wasn't subjective, but I said people still could have what could uniformly be perceived as good or bad taste. That's when you came in and disagreed

Yes and I still do. I'm not sure how you can in the same breath agree that it's common sense that everyone has different perspectives of what's good and bad, and think that there can be a uniform notion of good/bad taste. Anyway it's all going in circles now.
 
Yes and I still do. I'm not sure how you can in the same breath agree that it's common sense that everyone has different perspectives of what's good and bad, and think that there can be a uniform notion of good/bad taste. Anyway it's all going in circles now.
Well that's where we disagree isn't it. If I think someone has good or bad taste then I am still free to say it. I'm not going to forsake my own opinion
 
Well that's where we disagree isn't it. If I think someone has good or bad taste then I am still free to say it. I'm not going to forsake my own opinion

Of course. Again, I've never disagreed with that. Everyone has their own opinion on taste. It's a subjective thing. If you think something isn't good, you aren't wrong.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Of course. Again, I've never disagreed with that. Everyone has their own opinion on taste. It's a subjective thing. If you think something isn't good, you aren't wrong.
I could be wrong on something that I think is good - it depends on the consensus. That's what you aren't acknowledging right now. There is a consensus that the Beatles are a better band than one direction. Not everyone will think so, but if you stood up in a room full of half-educated people and argued for 1D, it won't end well.

That's all my point was. And I still don't understand why you won't acknowledge it
 
I could be wrong on something that I think is good - it depends on the consensus. That's what you aren't acknowledging right now. There is a consensus that the Beatles are a better band than one direction. Not everyone will think so, but if you stood up in a room full of half-educated people and argued for 1D, it won't end well.

That's all my point was. And I still don't understand why you won't acknowledge it

Ok. And that's where we disagree. :) I think everyone's entitled to their taste, and if they like something, I don't think they shouldn't be allowed to like it. But each to their own.
 
;)
Ok. And that's where we disagree. :) I think everyone's entitled to their taste, and if they like something, I don't think they shouldn't be allowed to like it. But each to their own.
Finally!

Btw I think they are entitled to like it too! They just need to be prepared to take some gentle ribbing for it ;)
 
;)
Finally!

Btw I think they are entitled to like it too! They just need to be prepared to take some gentle ribbing for it ;)

You say that as if I've conceded or agreed something that I haven't been saying all along haha but ok.
 
You say that as if I've conceded or agreed something that I haven't been saying all along haha but ok.
No not saying that at all - just saying finally worked out what each other meant. You've not conceded anything
 
I could be wrong on something that I think is good - it depends on the consensus. That's what you aren't acknowledging right now. There is a consensus that the Beatles are a better band than one direction. Not everyone will think so, but if you stood up in a room full of half-educated people and argued for 1D, it won't end well.

There's no need to bring Cruyff14 into it.
 
This board lately

1257603785.gif
 

Remove this Banner Ad

They sell out all their shows? The music landscape has changed thanks to the Internet but every concert I've been to in the bands mentioned above, always sell out.

They get critically raved about too. It's ok if you haven't listened to them or you don't like them but that doesn't mean they aren't considered great bands/artists.

Time always makes people look back fondly on anything as you remember the great times. Perhaps you had amazing sex to Led Zeppelin and that's why no one holds a candle to them - and that's fine, but to say that there isnt great music is ridiculous.

Arctic monkeys would be the biggest band of the most recent decade or so. As would KOL.

I'm obviously going to say this but Arctic Monkeys will definitely go down as one of THE defining bands of the 00's-10's.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Lol correct. You've come a long way haven't you! Stuart Pearce, must seem like a lifetime ago

It was very different times but it was still a great time to be a blue. SP did test quite a few of us though, and in the season we scored 10 goals at home, I missed two games and we scored 6 of them, ha ha.

Beanie was one of the more talented in the squad back then.
 
I'm obviously going to say this but Arctic Monkeys will definitely go down as one of THE defining bands of the 00's-10's.
Yep, I would also add QOSTA and Arcade Fire to that.
 
Yep, I would also add QOSTA and Arcade Fire to that.

Foo Fighters? Red Hot Chili Peppers? There's some pretty decent bands out there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom