The off topic thread #2

[typeclub]

Because Trump is an absolute thundercampaigner, no matter which side you fall on.

I don't see what his thundercampaigner mastery level has to do with lack of Hillary bashing and being a Hillary apologist.

 

[SM]

Ok I've reported the post that elicited my "numpty" response. I hate reporting posts but if someone's reported me over that then **** it

My post to Gero about him being an extreme far right supporter in your eyes because you equate being right leaning with right wing? Ok. Don't know what was insulting about Godwining but fair enough.

 

[SM]

I don't see what his thundercampaigner mastery level has to do with lack of Hillary bashing and being a Hillary apologist.

Haven't seen much Hilary apologism on here, would be surprised if there was much. Think most people think both are awful candidates.

 

[Jatz]

I don't see what his thundercampaigner mastery level has to do with lack of Hillary bashing and being a Hillary apologist.

Because she looks like a saint next to him.

Make no mistake, she's nowhere near the perfect candidate. Just the better of two duds

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Haven't seen much Hilary apologism on here, would be surprised if there was much. Think most people think both are awful candidates.

What? You were singing her praises about two pages back! Do you just make shit up as you go along?

 

[SM]

What? You were singing her praises about two pages back! Do you just make shit up as you go along?

Do you understand what apologism is?

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Because she looks like a saint next to him.

Make no mistake, she's nowhere near the perfect candidate. Just the better of two duds

I would like to see Trump win just for the epic melts. Could you imagine the reaction of all those special snowflakes out there? I know that's a tad immature of me, but when you've got two shit candidates you have to plump for one

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Do you understand what apologism is?

I do yes thanks

 

[SM]

I would like to see Trump win just for the epic melts. Could you imagine the reaction of all those special snowflakes out there? I know that's a tad immature of me, but when you've got two shit candidates you have to plump for one

I think most are 'plumping' for the non-sexist, xenophobic, abusive, intollerant candidate with a maturity and mental age that hits double digits.

But I suppose some will go for the brat because they think nuclear war or the total breakdown of American society would be fun to watch. Might even help make those night shifts more enjoyable.

 

[SM]

I do yes thanks

So please point out where I exhibited those tendancies towards Hilary, particularly in the last two pages.

 

[WealstoneRaider]

I think most are 'plumping' for the non-sexist, xenophobic, abusive, intollerant candidate with a maturity and mental age that hits double digits.

But I suppose some will go for the brat because they think nuclear war or the total breakdown of American society would be fun to watch. Might even help make those night shifts more enjoyable.

Spoken like a true right winger - sorry "leaner"

 

[Quivorir]

I wish I lived in your head. Just making shit up as you go along, living in your own fantasy world. It must be bliss.

 

[SM]

Spoken like a true right winger - sorry "leaner"

I'm still pretty sure you actually really like Trump but realised a few months ago that expressing that view here would see you castigated and ridiculed.

 

[Cooldude]

Welchstone is exactly Trump's target audience

 

[SM]

Welchstone is exactly Trump's target audience

Exactly. Fits the demographic to a t. I'm actually pretty sure I remember him singing his praises a while back but has back pedalled massively.

 

[WealstoneRaider]

So please point out where I exhibited those tendancies towards Hilary, particularly in the last two pages.

Ok here for a start:

I actually thought Clinton was pretty good, if for no other reason than for how measured she was.

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Exactly. Fits the demographic to a t. I'm actually pretty sure I remember him singing his praises a while back but has back pedalled massively.

How do I fit the demographic SM?

 

[WealstoneRaider]

I'm still pretty sure you actually really like Trump but realised a few months ago that expressing that view here would see you castigated and ridiculed.

I don't like Trump, but I agree with a lot of his policies. As a man he is pretty dispicable though

 

[SM]

Ok here for a start:

I come back to my original question.

Do you know what an apologist is?

 

[Cooldude]

Even Trump's daughter wouldn't let him grab her (by the pussy)

 

[WealstoneRaider]

I come back to my original question.

Do you know what an apologist is?

The point still stands, this board is far more pro-Hilary than Trump. Which is fine, but stop pretending otherwise. You have to argue a point on everything don't you - right down to the finest little detail.

 

[SM]

The point still stands, this board is far more pro-Hilary than Trump. Which is fine, but stop pretending otherwise. You have to argue a point on everything don't you - right down to the finest little detail.

That's a funny way of saying "Oh wait, i was wrong, sorry SM."

No one's pretending. Everyone is anti-Trump. I don't think anyone has said otherwise.

I believe Typeclub said people on here were Hilary apologists, and I reacted with surprise, which you then felt the need to pick apart and argue with. But go ahead with your narrative, the popcorn's almost ready.

Since it looks like you still haven't had the time to google it, an apologist is someone that defends someone's controversial actions. No one has said Hilary was right to delete those emails, or that her actions in Benghazi were the right course of action. No one has defended anything of that sort. In the same way that you haven't defended Trump's 'Grab her in the pussy' remarks. Which is good. So you aren't a Trump apologist even though you like him, and we aren't Hilary apologists even though we prefer her to him. See how that works?

 

[WealstoneRaider]

That's a funny way of saying "Oh wait, i was wrong, sorry SM."

No one's pretending. Everyone is anti-Trump. I don't think anyone has said otherwise.

I believe Typeclub said people on here were Hilary apologists, and I reacted with surprise, which you then felt the need to pick apart and argue with. But go ahead with your narrative, the popcorn's almost ready.

Since it looks like you still haven't had the time to google it, an apologist is someone that defends someone's controversial actions. No one has said Hilary was right to delete those emails, or that her actions in Benghazi were the right course of action. No one has defended anything of that sort. In the same way that you haven't defended Trump's 'Grab her in the pussy' remarks. Which is good. So you aren't a Trump apologist even though you like him, and we aren't Hilary apologists even though we prefer her to him. See how that works?

Smarminess oozes from your every pore doesn't it SM. You don't need to do it, trust me it's a nasty trait.

By throwing your support behind Clinton that action can be deemed as being an "apologist" for her. Ok fair enough, you're more for her because of the contempt you have for her opponent, but the fact is by backing her above Trump means that you have overlooked her misdemeanours over those of Trumps.

Anyway you still haven't explained why you think I'm a prime demographic target of Trump...

 

[SM]

Smarminess oozes from your every pore doesn't it SM. You don't need to do it, trust me it's a nasty trait.

By throwing your support behind Clinton that action can be deemed as being an "apologist" for her. Ok fair enough, you're more for her because of the contempt you have for her opponent, but the fact is by backing her above Trump means that you have overlooked her misdemeanours over those of Trumps.

Well... yes. Hers don't even come close to Trumps.

Smarminess was my response to the fact you never, ever, ever, seem to be able to admit when you're wrong about something, you just ignore the posts, which is why I was really surprised that you actually responded, even if it was to say "Yeah well, that's not the point."

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Well... yes. Hers don't even come close to Trumps.

Smarminess was my response to the fact you never, ever, ever, seem to be able to admit when you're wrong about something, you just ignore the posts, which is why I was really surprised that you actually responded, even if it was to say "Yeah well, that's not the point."

Ok fair enough, I can see what you are saying in retrospect. Was still no need for being smarmy though